http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38115
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-11-18 20:11:32 |2011-10-27 20:11:32
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
Bug #: 50880
Summary: __complex_acosh() picks wrong complex branch
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
--- Comment #1 from Richard B. Kreckel 2011-10-27
07:12:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 25623
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25623
patch to fix the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxdeliso at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50850
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
Bug #: 50881
Summary: ICE Segfault on compare this pointer with reference
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50854
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50851
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-27 08:48:57
UTC ---
I also see every lto test failing on i686-darwin9 and x86-64-darwin10
(powerpc-darwin9 is broken from other problems).
what I find particularly strange is that, if I execute random comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario-baumann at web dot de
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50851
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50854
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
--- Comment #1 from joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2011-10-27 09:07:16 UTC ---
Forgot to mention that 4.6.1 builds without problems.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cas43 at cs dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
Bug #: 50882
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2109 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix5.3
Target Milestone|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50879
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-*-linux
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50835
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50827
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|unrecognized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2011-10-27 09:23:47 UTC
---
Created attachment 25625
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25625
Stripped reload test case from bzip2
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> and RA chooses r1 and r0 as the regis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
--- Comment #2 from Diederik 2011-10-27 09:26:41 UTC ---
In the archive, see the file ccjiYBAm.out
If this is not sufficient, I can upload a new one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.7.0
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-27
09:35:38 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk? Still broken on the branch? Does backporting the patch
help there?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50008
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50164
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-27
10:00:39 UTC ---
That file is sufficient, but please attach it separately (the instructions at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ are pretty clear about wanting preprocessed source not
an archive that we need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
--- Comment #3 from joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2011-10-27 10:10:43 UTC ---
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20111022 fails with:
../gcc-4.7-20111022/gcc/tree-diagnostic.c:59: error: conflicting types for
‘loc_t’
/usr/include/sys/localedef31.h:195: error: previous de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
--- Comment #4 from Diederik 2011-10-27 10:18:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 25626
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25626
Preprocessed source file
Preprocessed file attached as requested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-27
10:20:29 UTC ---
Richard, the idea of adding another counter (per Comment #16) sounds good to
you? If we do that, the fix should be rather straightforward.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-27
10:21:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25627
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25627
Tentative fix
Would you mind giving it a try?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50448
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[4.3/4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-27 10:26:02 UTC ---
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
>
> --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-10-27 10:2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|lto |
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50617
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-27 10:37:49 UTC ---
Michael, can you attach the preprocessed source of insn-preds.c?
Thanks,
- Tom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-27 10:54:50
UTC ---
I applied the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02441.html
(no difference to the problem at hand).
The only definite thing I've spotted so far is in the args file:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50731
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-27 11:00:30 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 27 11:00:25 2011
New Revision: 180563
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180563
Log:
2011-10-27 Richard B. Kreckel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50765
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 regression] internal |[4.7 regression]
|compiler error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50803
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-27
11:28:11 UTC ---
There is a dup for this bug ... (search for 'SUN as')
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50827
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-27 11:34:47 UTC ---
> --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-27
> 11:28:11 UTC ---
> There is a dup for this bug ... (search for 'SUN as')
Not exactly: that one (PR lto/47333)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50835
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50731
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-10-27 11:39:23 UTC ---
I've been running gcc with this patch since the last week without ill
effects thus far:
@@ -1429,14 +1429,14 @@ produce_symtab (struct output_block *ob,
/* We keep around
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50617
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-27 11:44:02 UTC ---
On 27-Oct-11, at 6:34 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Diego, any reason why you didn't prefix those public functions in
> gimple-streamer.[ch]?
I have a patch to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50868
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50843
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50823
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-27 11:50:36 UTC ---
On 27-Oct-11, at 7:21 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is (sizeof (int) == sizeof (long long))? What else could be target
> specific here? VRP is target agnostic
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo