http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #13 from Tomohiro Kashiwada kikairoya at gmail dot com 2011-10-29
06:50:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Regarding the double load. In a statement like a = b, both a be should be
individually accessed even if they refer to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35367
--- Comment #3 from Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru
2011-10-29 06:55:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 25657
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25657
taken from debian's config-ml.diff
Similar bug in libffi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50907
Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #14 from Henrik Nordström henrik at henriknordstrom dot net
2011-10-29 10:45:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
See 7.1.7.5 second and third paragraph and the note just after.
Is that means a statement
a = b;
always should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #14 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-29
11:31:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 25658
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25658
3 files
I managed to reduce a test case to 3 LTO files now
unpack the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-29
12:12:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 25659
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25659
reproducer
Managed to minimize now
Unpack the tar file and on x86-64
%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50910
Bug #: 50910
Summary: [avr] inefficient division by 2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50910
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29 12:32:37 UTC ---
Using this patch, the dead label introduced by cfg_layout_finalize is removed:
To be more precise: Using this patch, the dead label introduced by
cfg_layout_finalize is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29 12:59:33
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Oct 29 12:59:30 2011
New Revision: 180653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180653
Log:
gcc/objc:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29 13:03:27
UTC ---
let's give it a few weeks on trunk - and then back-port to 4.6 if all is OK
(since we just missed the 4.6.2 release).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-10-29 13:08:13 UTC ---
Or as one file:
% cat test.i
struct _ddebug {
const char *modname;
const char *function;
const char *filename;
const char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50903
Cynthia chadjidakis at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
--- Comment #5 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com 2011-10-29
14:06:53 UTC ---
Hi, all, I think this bug happened about more than one years, I have test in
both gcc 4.5 and gcc 4.6.x under Windows.
I have both post an issue in GDB
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-10-29
14:28:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I haven't been able to reproduce the loop on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with
any of 4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7.
arm eabi targets force 64bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
14:36:05 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Sat Oct 29 14:35:59 2011
New Revision: 180654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180654
Log:
PR target/50887
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521
--- Comment #15 from Tomohiro Kashiwada kikairoya at gmail dot com 2011-10-29
14:37:15 UTC ---
I see. Thanks detail exposition.
I think the behavior of my patch seems correct and it should be merged.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50892
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50911
Bug #: 50911
Summary: [4.7 regression] assertion failure in
expand_vec_perm_interleave2 with -msse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
15:17:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, I see in the standard:
[Fortran 2008]
C553 An entity with the SAVE attribute shall be a common block, variable,
or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50753
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
15:18:28 UTC ---
Submitted patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-10/msg00203.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50912
Bug #: 50912
Summary: [4.7 regression] gimple assertion failure at
gimple.h:1940 with -msse2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
-fully-dynamic-string
--disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-checking=release CFLAGS='-O2
-mtune=core2 -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fgraphite-identity
-floop-interchange -floop-block -floop-parallelize-all' LDFLAGS=
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111029 (experimental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
15:57:04 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 29 15:57:00 2011
New Revision: 180655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180655
Log:
PR target/50691
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-10-29 16:49:38 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:47:52PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
One might argue that a SAVE namelist-group-name should mean that all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-10-29 16:51:10 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:17:19PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
From c.l.f:
Unfortunately, I also found that gfortran has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29 17:16:11 UTC ---
Using the bb-reorder patch, the assert is introduced/triggered by r177209:
...
r177209 | rth | 2011-08-02 21:56:29 +0200 (Tue, 02 Aug 2011) | 5 lines
h8300: Generate correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50902
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-10-29
17:39:43 UTC ---
Confirmed that both the dinternal.ii and MarvinNOEPotential.ii test cases
reproduce this ICE using current gcc trunk under x86_64 Fedora 15.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50908
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50617
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
18:58:52 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 29 18:58:48 2011
New Revision: 180660
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180660
Log:
PR target/50617
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50914
Bug #: 50914
Summary: Error while installing gcc-4.3.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50914
--- Comment #1 from jdasu86 at gmail dot com 2011-10-29 19:08:39 UTC ---
I want to install ns-2.34 which requires gcc-4.3.0 but I am having gcc-4.6.0 in
fedora 15.
So I tried to install gcc-4.3.0, taht reported me above mentioned bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50914
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50915
Bug #: 50915
Summary: gcc fails at run time due to undefined
libintl_textdomain
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
20:19:46 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 29 20:19:38 2011
New Revision: 180662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180662
Log:
PR target/50691
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50617
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
20:23:04 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 29 20:23:00 2011
New Revision: 180663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180663
Log:
PR target/50617
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50914
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-29
21:29:00 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 29 21:28:57 2011
New Revision: 180664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180664
Log:
PR target/50691
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50617
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50913
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #55 from Dave Murphy davem at devkitpro dot org 2011-10-29
23:27:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
I tested with GCC 4.6.2 and the patch provided by Mikael Pettersson. It works
for -march=armv4t and -march=armv5t, but not for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
Bug #: 50916
Summary: -Os, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE breaks strcpy others if
inlined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50915
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-30 00:22:59 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 30 00:22:53 2011
New Revision: 180670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180670
Log:
/cp
2011-10-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-30 00:24:54 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 30 00:24:51 2011
New Revision: 180671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180671
Log:
/cp
2011-10-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45631
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-10-30
02:33:29 UTC ---
Honza, any further ideas how to proceed? Should the threshold just be lowered?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-30
03:21:49 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 30 03:21:45 2011
New Revision: 180672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180672
Log:
PR target/50691
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
53 matches
Mail list logo
