[Bug libgomp/50977] non-deterministic failure in cactusADM using openmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50977 --- Comment #3 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 08:35:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Without a small self-contained reproducer hard to do anything about it. I know. Itried, but did not manage to create one. Due to the non

[Bug c/50997] New: ARM: No warnings for unreachable code for ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50997 Bug #: 50997 Summary: ARM: No warnings for unreachable code for ARM cross compiler Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/50997] ARM: No warnings for unreachable code for ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50997 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

Possible armv7 hardfp try catch bug

Hi all, I'm currently looking into an gmp issue. A few gmp tests fail. for example make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/gmp-5.0.2/tests/cxx' terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' terminate called recursively /bin/sh: line 5:

[Bug c++/37798] unaligned memory access with multiple inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37798 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc

[Bug c++/37030] namespace and class within with similar name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37030 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/36431] The C++ front-end produces some NOP_EXPR for vector types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36431 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/43503] field in-place decrement isn't optimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43503 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/50991] crtstuff.c:65:23: fatal error: libgcc_tm.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2011-11-06 12:02:43 UTC --- Yes, please commit the fix!

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at

[Bug c++/50998] New: ICE partial specialization error at cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50998 Bug #: 50998 Summary: ICE partial specialization error at cp/pt.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50998] ICE partial specialization error at cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50998 --- Comment #1 from fate66260 at gmail dot com 2011-11-06 12:34:32 UTC --- correct template class... Types struct variantTypes... { // implements... };

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 12:36:23 UTC --- Trying to simplify this, the following is enough to trigger the behavior: extern int w; void foo (void) { int e2 = w; __asm__ volatile (/* %0 */ : : ro

[Bug c++/50998] [C++0x] ICE partial specialization error at cp/pt.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50998 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 12:46:43 UTC --- Well, I guess the testcase is simply invalid for MachO, or the way MachO does this UNSPEC stuff is broken (not properly checked during legitimization) or

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 13:00:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks.. Well, I guess the testcase is simply invalid for MachO, well it works for -O0 (and for x86 darwin) ... so let's assume

[Bug c++/47695] [C++0X] Calling a deleted function fails twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47695 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 13:20:22 UTC --- Ah, need to use constrain_visibility_for_template for function templates as well as class templates.

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 13:21:35 UTC --- No, I was misreading the code, it should already deal with function templates.

Re: Possible armv7 hardfp try catch bug

Hi, Bugs should be reported to Bugzilla, not the mailing list, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs Requests for help using GCC should be sent to the gcc-help mailing list, see http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html

[Bug regression/50999] New: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 Bug #: 50999 Summary: [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-10-15 00:00:00 |2011-11-06 0:00

[Bug regression/50999] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-11-06 17:20:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) It seemed there was work in progress last I looked. If not, it should be xfailed. Please don't. (In reply to comment

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 17:47:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) second I would prefer to see the bug fixed Certainly. rather than hidden by any of the above. It wouldn't be hidden by

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 18:16:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Wouldn't standard procedure be to revert the offending patch? Well, first, I am not sure that the offending patch is identified yet According

[Bug lto/48508] ICE in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:11409

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508 Joshua Conner josh.m.conner at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-11-06 19:20:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) According to comment 0 and comment 8, it should be between 179600 and 179611. I have to admit that I don't see any

[Bug other/50991] crtstuff.c:65:23: fatal error: libgcc_tm.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 19:24:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Nov 6 19:24:19 2011 New Revision: 181039 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181039 Log: PR other/50991

[Bug other/50991] crtstuff.c:65:23: fatal error: libgcc_tm.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50991 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 Bug #: 51000 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 19:42:22 UTC --- Created attachment 25730 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25730 Possible patch which pushes the vtab to the toplevel Based on Michael's

[Bug middle-end/50640] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_12.f03 -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 20:02:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) From comment #3 I infered that the usual suspect is r179618. Hans-Peter are you sure about you range in comment #8? You're

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/20296] Speeding up small interrupts on avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20296 Wim Lewis wiml at dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wiml at dot org ---

[Bug target/51001] New: redundant address re-computations on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51001 Bug #: 51001 Summary: redundant address re-computations on ARM Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/51001] redundant address re-computations on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51001 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug c++/47695] [C++0X] Calling a deleted function fails twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47695 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 21:05:47 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Nov 6 21:05:44 2011 New Revision: 181042 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181042 Log: 2011-11-06 Paolo

[Bug target/51002] New: SP_H register is used even on targets that do not have it (eg attiny26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002 Bug #: 51002 Summary: SP_H register is used even on targets that do not have it (eg attiny26) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug c++/47695] [C++0X] Calling a deleted function fails twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47695 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50964] [trans-mem] no support for LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50964 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/42129] ICE in pointer difference with sizeof(int)sizeof(void *)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at

[Bug c++/40355] ICE in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:357

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40355 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/34983] i486-linux-gnu-g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34983 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | ---

[Bug c++/29028] No warning about unused names introduced with using declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29028 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |dodji at

[Bug target/51003] New: bfin ICE compiling libgcc in gen_const_vector, at emit-rtl.c:5476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 Bug #: 51003 Summary: bfin ICE compiling libgcc in gen_const_vector, at emit-rtl.c:5476 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51003] bfin ICE compiling libgcc in gen_const_vector, at emit-rtl.c:5476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||bfin-rtems4.11

[Bug c++/42129] ICE in pointer difference with sizeof(int)sizeof(void *)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129 Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/38534] gcc 4.2.1 and above: No need to save called-saved registers in 'noreturn' function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38534 Julian Stecklina js at alien8 dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||js at alien8 dot de

[Bug c++/42129] ICE in pointer difference with sizeof(int)sizeof(void *)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-07 00:19:45 UTC --- Nathan, if you can take care of this issue, it would be great. Feel free to assign it to yourself. Note, I didn't write any code, draft patch is

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 00:32:49 UTC --- Created attachment 25731 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25731 Tentative fix This enhances RTL PRE. You need an up-to-date tree to

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:14:37 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:14:33 2011 New Revision: 181056 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181056 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:15:13 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:15:08 2011 New Revision: 181057 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181057 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #20 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:15:42 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:15:35 2011 New Revision: 181058 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181058 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #21 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:16:06 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:16:01 2011 New Revision: 181059 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181059 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #22 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:39:11 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:39:08 2011 New Revision: 181060 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181060 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 --- Comment #23 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 01:39:24 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Nov 7 01:39:22 2011 New Revision: 181061 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181061 Log: PR target/30282 *

[Bug target/30282] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 cause red zone to be used when there is none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30282 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility not overridden by template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 04:40:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Nov 7 04:40:14 2011 New Revision: 181069 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181069 Log: PR c++/35688

[Bug tree-optimization/51000] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_get_store_cost, at tree-vect-stmts.c:923 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51000 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/50997] ARM: No warnings for unreachable code for ARM cross compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50997 --- Comment #2 from Fredrik Hederstierna fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com 2011-11-07 07:33:19 UTC --- Ok, I didn't know that checks for unreachable-code was removed. Though I would like to know about the background/discussion behind

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 --- Comment #40 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 07:34:05 UTC --- I've tracked this behaviour down to cp_parser_parameter_declaration_clause in cp/parser.c which has a special case for else if (token-type ==

[Bug fortran/50960] [OOP] vtables not marked as constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50960 --- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 07:35:24 UTC --- See also PR 50640 comment 16 and the patch in attachment 25730

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 --- Comment #41 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 07:54:12 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 7 07:54:06 2011 New Revision: 181072 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181072 Log: PR libstdc++/50982

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 --- Comment #42 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-07 07:55:36 UTC --- This should be fixed now, could you test again? Thanks