[Bug tree-optimization/50078] [4.6/4.7 Regression] combine wrong code: volatile accesses optimized out

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|matz at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/51330] New: Compiling issue that seems specific to i586 with gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51330 Bug #: 51330 Summary: Compiling issue that seems specific to i586 with gcc 4.6 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51330] Compiling issue that seems specific to i586 with gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51330 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target ---

[Bug ada/51307] [4.7 Regression] s-taprop.adb:676:25: CLOCK_RT_Ada not declared in OS_Constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307 Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/51329] O3 optimizes away a loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51329 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug middle-end/50907] [4.7 Regression] EDGE_CROSSING incorrectly set across same section with -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50907 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/51330] Compiling issue that seems specific to i586 with gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51330 --- Comment #2 from Rémy remy.garrigue at gmail dot com 2011-11-28 10:38:53 UTC --- Package source are available in the source panel here: https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=xtreemfs-1.2.3project=home%3Axtreemfs The most accurate

[Bug c++/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 --- Comment #1 from David Kastrup dak at gnu dot org 2011-11-28 11:32:46 UTC --- -fno-optimize-sibling-calls avoids the problematic optimization. For no good reason at all, -fkeep-inline-functions, documented to do a completely unrelated

[Bug target/51330] Compiling issue that seems specific to i586 with gcc 4.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51330 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c++/51331] New: bad code generated when explicitly calling auto-generated constructor of virtual base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51331 Bug #: 51331 Summary: bad code generated when explicitly calling auto-generated constructor of virtual base Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug c/51332] New: __sync_add_and_fetch segfaults when -fPIC is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51332 Bug #: 51332 Summary: __sync_add_and_fetch segfaults when -fPIC is enabled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c/51332] __sync_add_and_fetch segfaults when -fPIC is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51332 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 David Kastrup dak at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.5.0 |4.5.2 --- Comment #2

[Bug target/50751] SH Target: Displacement addressing does not work for QImode and HImode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751 Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25848|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-28 12:42:17 UTC --- --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26 15:18:40 UTC --- Does this reduced test work with

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 13:11:49 UTC --- Created attachment 25933 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25933 gcc47-pr50317-1.patch One way to fix this regression is schedule another

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 13:17:02 UTC --- Created attachment 25934 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25934 gcc47-pr50317-2.patch Patch to drop ={v} {CLOBBER} stmts when the lhs lost

[Bug libstdc++/51288] [C++0x] get_money implementation is missing the sentry object (does not skip leading whitespace)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51288 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 13:24:29 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 28 13:24:23 2011 New Revision: 181775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181775 Log: 2011-11-28 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/51288] [C++0x] get_money implementation is missing the sentry object (does not skip leading whitespace)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51288 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50814] SH Target: SHAD / SHLD instructions not used on SH2A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50814 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 13:43:16 UTC --- BTW, when regtesting, I've found that there are many ICEs at -O0. A typical one is gcc.c-torture/compile/2923-1.c with -m2a -O0: ...: error: insn does

[Bug c++/51333] New: cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 Bug #: 51333 Summary: cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #7 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 13:46:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Patch to drop ={v} {CLOBBER} stmts when the lhs lost TREE_ADDRESSABLE bit during execute_update_addresses_taken. Actually it's not

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-28 13:58:02 UTC --- On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:51:02AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:10:40 UTC --- Perhaps we could drop the var ={v} {CLOBBER} stmts when renaming the var into SSA instead. As for gcc47-pr50317-1.patch, the another walk isn't because of the

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:17:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) I kept the SAVE attribute because the comment (which you remove in your patch) claims that it is needed to actually allow the the

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:21:38 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Nov 28 14:21:33 2011 New Revision: 181778 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181778 Log: 2011-11-28 Tobias Burnus

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:22:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-26 15:18:40 UTC --- Does this reduced test work with

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 --- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2011-11-28 14:24:02 UTC --- Just for reference, compiling CP2K_2009-05-01.f90 results in 684 modules, stracing yields something like 12000 calls to open, and 148'847'399

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-28 14:34:38 UTC --- Does this work? No, I still get EINVAL. Otherwise I suppose we must not define __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT on Tru64, causing

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:36:53 UTC --- Created attachment 25936 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25936 gcc47-pr50317-3.patch Alternative to gcc47-pr50317-3.patch (everything

[Bug c++/51333] cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:38:15 UTC --- works with -lsupc++ but I'm not sure why it fails without

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:40:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) The strange thing is that is seems to have worked so far without issues, e.g. in emutls.c. and in

[Bug fortran/51308] PARAMETER attribute conflicts with SAVE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51308 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:47:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Nov 28 14:47:39 2011 New Revision: 181779 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181779 Log: Really commit the test

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #10 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 14:52:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Perhaps we could drop the var ={v} {CLOBBER} stmts when renaming the var into SSA instead. I think your current patch is better, no

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 15:10:00 UTC --- Created attachment 25937 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25937 gcc47-pr50237.patch Getting rid of the attribute constructor in

[Bug middle-end/50074] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c execution test on x86_64 with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 15:15:32 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02413.html

[Bug middle-end/49719] [4.7 Regression] test gcc.target/arm/sibcall-1.c fails for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49719 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug debug/47858] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] IPA-SRA decreases quality of debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51333] cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 David Kastrup dak at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.5.2 | --- Comment #2 from

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 15:32:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #8) Perhaps we could drop the var ={v} {CLOBBER} stmts when renaming the var into SSA instead. I think

[Bug c++/51289] [C++0x] Template template alias causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51289 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51289] [C++0x] Template template alias causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51289 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/50237] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failure for libcpp/lex.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237 --- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-28 15:40:32 UTC --- Getting rid of the attribute constructor in libcpp/lex.c isn't that hard either. ... but doesn't help for the Go comparison

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/51056] [4.7 Regression][OOP] Bogus Unused module variable '__vtab_domain_Domain_container'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51056 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug other/51022] powerpc libgcc static-object.mk error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51022 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 16:02:16 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Nov 28 16:02:10 2011 New Revision: 181782 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181782 Log: Cleanup rs6000/t-ppccomm

[Bug other/51022] powerpc libgcc static-object.mk error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51022 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 16:21:24 UTC --- Yes from my side.

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51334] New: [OOP] ICE with type-bound operator: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:55

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51334 Bug #: 51334 Summary: [OOP] ICE with type-bound operator: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_conv_component_ref, at

[Bug bootstrap/50993] IRIX: fails to build in lto for sgi1.0 linker flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50993 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/51334] [OOP] ICE with type-bound operator: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have function_type in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:556

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51334 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||46328 ---

[Bug middle-end/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/51335] New: [4.7 Regression] --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51335 Bug #: 51335 Summary: [4.7 Regression] --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap doesn't work Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/51335] [4.7 Regression] --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51335 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-11-28 17:58:52 UTC --- We should either enable C++ or disable libitm in this case.

[Bug c++/51329] O3 optimizes away a loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51329 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 18:23:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Thanks, will report to apple. Reporting to Apple is useless, they have long moved to Clang, so they

[Bug middle-end/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 --- Comment #4 from David Kastrup dak at gnu dot org 2011-11-28 18:24:10 UTC --- I can confirm that my version of gcc identifying itself as gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) makes your test program abort under -O2. If you

[Bug bootstrap/51335] [4.7 Regression] --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51335 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 18:24:56 UTC --- dup of PR 51072 ?

[Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/51336] New: [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336 Bug #: 51336 Summary: [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at

[Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-11-28 19:16:25 UTC --- Note, like PR51279, the testcases both ICE the compiler at -O1 -g -funroll-loops but not at -O0 -g -funroll-loops on x86_64-apple-darwin11.

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under -Os causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #18 from Kyle Moffett Kyle.D.Moffett at boeing dot com 2011-11-28 19:30:07 UTC --- I am happy to report that your updated 4.6.2 patch seems to be 100% functional on e500/SPE. I get identical test-summary reports for patched-4.6.2

[Bug middle-end/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 --- Comment #5 from David Kastrup dak at gnu dot org 2011-11-28 19:33:26 UTC --- Question: the proposed fix is in gcc/calls.c which looks somewhat architecture independent. Am I right in assuming that this means that the bug may manifest itself

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 --- Comment #11 from Joerg Wunsch j at uriah dot heep.sax.de 2011-11-28 19:45:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Jörg, could you prepare a list of functions that shall be excluded from libgcc? You can also answer to my mail PR28718 Infos?

[Bug c++/51289] [C++0x] Template template alias causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51289 --- Comment #2 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-11-28 20:12:38 UTC --- A candidate patch for this was submitted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02488.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 20:12:10 UTC --- Created attachment 25939 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25939 gcc47-pr51014.patch Untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/51323] g++ confuses this with function argument in optimized call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 20:38:59 UTC --- That would be too big hammer approach. While the fix is in arch independent code, on most architectures you could hit it only with 6 resp. 8 arguments and

[Bug c++/51336] [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 21:02:33 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 21:02:27 2011 New Revision: 181785 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181785 Log: PR

[Bug debug/50317] [4.7 Regression] missing DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 21:04:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 21:04:45 2011 New Revision: 181788 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181788 Log: PR debug/50317 *

[Bug middle-end/50907] [4.7 Regression] EDGE_CROSSING incorrectly set across same section with -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50907 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 21:04:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 21:04:10 2011 New Revision: 181787 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181787 Log: PR middle-end/50907

[Bug bootstrap/51335] [4.7 Regression] --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51335 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50078] [4.6/4.7 Regression] combine wrong code: volatile accesses optimized out

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 21:03:16 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 21:03:11 2011 New Revision: 181786 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181786 Log: PR

[Bug bootstrap/51072] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail

[Bug fortran/51338] New: seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 Bug #: 51338 Summary: seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/51337] New: SH Target: Various testsuite ICEs for -m2a -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51337 Bug #: 51337 Summary: SH Target: Various testsuite ICEs for -m2a -O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50078] [4.6 Regression] combine wrong code: volatile accesses optimized out

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.6 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50907] [4.7 Regression] EDGE_CROSSING incorrectly set across same section with -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fPIC -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50907 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51338] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2011-11-28 21:10:25 UTC --- Created attachment 25940 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25940 preprocessed Fortran code

[Bug c++/51336] [C++11] is_abstract and sfinae

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51336 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-11-28 21:17:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) IMO you need one further indirection, e.g. Ah, yes, makes sense (although clang accepts both versions). Btw.: Neither of

[Bug fortran/51338] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bdavis at gcc dot

[Bug other/50775] Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com 2011-11-28 21:48:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Also, I have a question about the following fields of `ira_allocno': /* The number of objects tracked in the following

[Bug middle-end/51339] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with -fopenmp and parallel for

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339 Bug #: 51339 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with -fopenmp and parallel for Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51338] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #3 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 21:59:02 UTC --- Reduced: SUBROUTINE PAXCUT(CHIN,CHOUT) CHARACTER*(*) CHIN,CHOUT IF(INDEX(CHOUT(K:),'.OR.').EQ.INDEX(CHOUT(K:),'.AND.')) THEN ENDIF

[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41975 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/51340] New: SH Target: Make -mfused-madd enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340 Bug #: 51340 Summary: SH Target: Make -mfused-madd enabled by default Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/51338] [4.6/4.7 Regression] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-11-28 22:31:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) The problem is that SH target can't do those simple array accesses well at QI/HImode because of the lack of displacement addressing for

[Bug c++/51341] New: make cannot detect head file change by dependency file with gcc 4.6.1 on ubuntu 11.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51341 Bug #: 51341 Summary: make cannot detect head file change by dependency file with gcc 4.6.1 on ubuntu 11.10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug fortran/51338] [4.6/4.7 Regression] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #5 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 22:49:33 UTC --- Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/dependency.c === --- gcc/gcc/fortran/dependency.c(revision 181789) +++

[Bug preprocessor/51341] make cannot detect head file change by dependency file with gcc 4.6.1 on ubuntu 11.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51341 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |preprocessor

[Bug preprocessor/51341] make cannot detect head file change by dependency file with gcc 4.6.1 on ubuntu 11.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51341 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51340] SH Target: Make -mfused-madd enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 23:09:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Is there any particular reason why this should not be enabled by default for SH targets that support the FMAC insn? PR29100?

[Bug fortran/51338] [4.6/4.7 Regression] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #6 from Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 23:20:27 UTC --- The above patch has no new testsuite regressions. If someone wants to check and make sure the optimisation(s) that could or were being done is still correct, and

[Bug other/50775] Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 23:26:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Wrong profitable hard regs calculation for register files requiring aligned start register was a merging problem with a patch for

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-28 23:29:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Specifying -fno-tree-forwprop doesn't seem to have any effect on these cases. For that function, -fdump-tree-all shows that the

  1   2   >