[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-02 09:49:39 UTC --- On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6/4.7 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 09:52:27 UTC --- Probably a better place than phi-opt would be RTL expansion (thus, out-of-SSA for the PHI nodes) where based on target cost those constants could be

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-02 10:12:26 UTC --- Francois, please take a look asap. Hans-Peter, can it be a memory issue? The recent changes imply that more memory is used by these data structures,

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic cannot appear in a constant-expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-02 10:13:02 UTC --- Sure, agreed on that.

[Bug c++/51180] [C++0x] inner class alias-definition variadic template error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180 --- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-12-02 10:15:06 UTC --- jason at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit: I'm surprised that it doesn't just work already; writing t2B... already works, doing

[Bug c++/51385] Unnecessary instantiation converting to pointer to template class instance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 10:36:14 UTC --- Here's a version which isn't a compile-time-hog but demonstrates the unnecessary instantiation with a static_assert (so needs -std=c++11) template unsigned

[Bug c++/51385] Unnecessary instantiation converting to pointer to template class instance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/51385] Unnecessary instantiation converting to pointer to template class instance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 10:47:45 UTC --- Interestingly G++ is happy to not instantiate the template when it's not possible to, i.e. making this change and defining -DINCOMPLETE allows it to compile:

[Bug debug/49951] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Debug stepping behavior regarding g++ Class destructor has changed for the worse starting at gcc 4.5.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 10:54:45 UTC --- If the expressions only become invariant after unrolling then the issue is that without CCP LIM does not see they are invariant I suppose. No, adding a

[Bug other/51375] different prefix for (s)libdir and bindir, gcc searches for as in wrong directories

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51375 --- Comment #2 from pjodrr at gmail dot com 2011-12-02 11:01:31 UTC --- ... and also with 4.7-2026

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 11:07:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Hans-Peter, can it be a memory issue? The recent changes imply that more memory is used by these data structures, and that is

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-02 11:10:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) Hans-Peter, can it be a memory issue? The recent changes imply that more memory is used by

[Bug lto/47259] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-02 11:12:20 UTC --- Note the huge slow down is entirely in the third block, for max_load_factor(.3), we must do something about it.

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 11:15:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (My reply probably seems slightly odd due to the mid-air collision with comment #2.) Oh, I see floating-point changes, has the

[Bug lto/47259] [4.7 Regression] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/51387] Test vect.exp/vect-116.c fails on execution when compiled with -mavx2 on sde.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51387 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 11:50:39 UTC --- One thing I notice (and that's the only difference I can spot at the tree level) is that we do not CSE the **2s of a = sqrt((rect_inductor%v2%x -

[Bug lto/47259] [4.7 Regression] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug c/51371] compilation should produce warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51371 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed for std::complexdouble

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 12:53:06 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Dec 2 12:53:03 2011 New Revision: 181908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181908 Log: 2011-12-02 Martin

[Bug c/31709] IMA and __attributes__((__packed__)) conflicts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31709 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/25130] [4.1/4.2 Regression] miscompilation in GCSE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25130 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 --- Comment #51 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 13:23:57 UTC --- Nope, I don't have more than a couple hacks to try different approaches as of right now. I should dust them off for next stage1.

[Bug bootstrap/51388] New: Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 Bug #: 51388 Summary: Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds) Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug c/51389] New: GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51389 Bug #: 51389 Summary: GCC uses up to 75GB of virtual memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-02 14:31:27 UTC --- On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bur...@net-b.de |dominiq at lps

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 14:52:49 UTC --- Since 4.4.0 we no longer warn for unrecognized -Wno- forms, thus the configure check is broken as-is.

[Bug target/51381] Internal compiler error for arm target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381 --- Comment #7 from eric.valette at free dot fr 2011-12-02 14:58:49 UTC --- The line given in the error correspond to a gcc_unreachable call in the fp_immediate_constant (rtx x) function???

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #3 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2011-12-02 14:59:37 UTC --- On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: I see gcc-4.3 -c -Wno-narrowing t.c -DHAVE_ARG

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-02 15:02:27 UTC --- On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/47259] [4.7 Regression] LTO and global register variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 15:49:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Dec 2 15:49:37 2011 New Revision: 181927 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181927 Log: 2011-12-02 Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #27 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:02:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) The trivial example is (x + 2**52) - 2**52 which rounds x to an integer. Without parens we optimize away that rounding effect.

[Bug c++/51344] cc1plus hangs when compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-02 16:09:57 UTC --- On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Still the behavior of warning for -Wno- changed appearantly. Joseph? The idea

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-02 16:13:25 UTC --- On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #27 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:20:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:51 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: I see gcc-4.3 -c

[Bug fortran/48887] [4.7 Regression][OOP] SELECT TYPE: Associate name shall not be a pointer/allocatable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48887 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/51313] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected class 'constant', have 'unary' (nop_expr) in null_ptr_cst_p, at cp/call.c:556

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51313 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #30 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:29:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) And for the sake of completeness the evaluation of sub above and x = (x + 2.d0**52) - 2.d0**52 should behave consistently

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-12-02 16:32:52 UTC --- On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #30 from Tobias Burnus

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-02 16:37:37 UTC --- And for the sake of completeness the evaluation of sub above and subroutine sub2(x) real*8 x x = (x + 2.d0**52) - 2.d0**52 end

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #33 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-12-02 16:45:24 UTC --- The failing polyhedron 2005 benchmark is linpk which can be seen with -Ofast on x86_64-apple-darwin11... Value= 25.114499300 Target=

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:48:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Now, the question is why we don't consistently error in 4.3 ... I see gcc-4.3 -c -Wno-narrowing t.c -DHAVE_ARG cc1: error:

[Bug rtl-optimization/37782] [4.4 regression] Stage2 ada compiler miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37782 --- Comment #13 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:54:33 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Fri Dec 2 16:54:27 2011 New Revision: 181929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181929 Log: Revert:

[Bug rtl-optimization/37451] Extra addition for doloop in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37451 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:54:33 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Fri Dec 2 16:54:27 2011 New Revision: 181929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181929 Log: Revert:

[Bug bootstrap/51388] Configure failure to detect unsupported warning options for non-bootstrap builds (including cross builds)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51388 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 16:59:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Still the behavior of warning for -Wno- changed appearantly. Joseph?

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 17:06:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) Ok, which is, I suppose, a bug in both compilers. Kind of, though, -ffast-math by itself already is on the verge of violating the

[Bug target/51390] New: Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 Bug #: 51390 Summary: Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/51390] Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 17:18:55 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Dec 2 17:18:51 2011 New Revision: 181930 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181930 Log: PR 51390 Modified:

[Bug c++/51313] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected class 'constant', have 'unary' (nop_expr) in null_ptr_cst_p, at cp/call.c:556

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51313 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-12-02 17:23:24 UTC --- This badly requires a reduced testcase, I'm going to prepare one. Then the fix should be pretty simple: just use STRIP_NOPs unconditionally, ie cxx0x

[Bug target/51390] Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 17:26:06 UTC --- Created attachment 25972 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25972 Patch to fix the problem

[Bug target/51390] Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51313] [4.7 Regression][C++0x] ICE: tree check: expected class 'constant', have 'unary' (nop_expr) in null_ptr_cst_p, at cp/call.c:556

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51313 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 ---

[Bug c++/51344] cc1plus hangs when compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51344 --- Comment #3 from Nickolay Cherney koliasvskj at gmail dot com 2011-12-02 18:58:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) But apparently this issue is very old, I can reproduce with 4.3.x too! Out of curiosity, which release series worked for you?

[Bug target/51002] SP_H register is used even on targets that do not have it (eg attiny26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 19:14:20 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Dec 2 19:14:15 2011 New Revision: 181936 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181936 Log: PR target/51002 PR

[Bug target/51345] [avr] Devices with 8-bit SP need their own multilib(s)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 19:14:20 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Dec 2 19:14:15 2011 New Revision: 181936 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181936 Log: PR target/51002 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 21:21:15 UTC --- One thing I notice (and that's the only difference I can spot at the tree level) is that we do not CSE the **2s of There are many missed hoisting

[Bug target/51387] Test vect.exp/vect-116.c fails on execution when compiled with -mavx2 on sde.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51387 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-02 21:57:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 2 21:57:15 2011 New Revision: 181951 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181951 Log: PR target/51387 *

[Bug target/51387] Test vect.exp/vect-116.c fails on execution when compiled with -mavx2 on sde.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51387 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/50814] SH Target: SHAD / SHLD instructions not used on SH2A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50814 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51337] SH Target: Various testsuite ICEs for -m2a -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51337 Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51368] libstdc++ python pretty printers should use --with-python-dir just like libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51333] cxxabi.h incompatible with -fkeep-inline-functions at link time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51333 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-03 00:52:03 UTC --- that function was not defined in its own file in 4.5, I moved it for PR 43863

[Bug lto/51105] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/51307] [4.7 Regression] s-taprop.adb:676:25: CLOCK_RT_Ada not declared in OS_Constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-12-03 02:12:44 UTC --- On 28-Nov-11, at 4:48 AM, charlet at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Here is the patch from Thomas Quinot fixing this issue, I'll commit it when I get a chance, feel free to use

[Bug c++/51347] [trans-mem] Segfault on templates with -O1 -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51347 Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug preprocessor/51391] New: pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 Bug #: 51391 Summary: pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #1 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:10:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25973 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25973 this is the source file

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #2 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:10:37 UTC --- Created attachment 25974 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25974 this is the header file

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #3 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:11:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25975 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25975 this is the bad output I am getting

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #4 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:13:49 UTC --- Forgot to mention ... in my original discovery, I was seeing it occurring when inlines were inside inlines. That is what I submitted, I don't know if it is part of the

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-03 03:14:27 UTC --- The warnings are correct. You declared some functions as inline but they are not being inlined because optimization is not turned on (that is -fno-inline).

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-03 03:15:48 UTC --- inlineBug.h:16:8: warning: function ‘inlineBug::inlineBug()’ can never be inlined because it is suppressed using -fno-inline Without any -On (or -O or -Os),

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #7 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:18:50 UTC --- Wow ... I never picked that up when trying to find the answer in the online GCC docs. Thanks for the advice. That being said, why would it work when I didn't have the

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-03 03:24:26 UTC --- Because there is code to explicitly turn off the warning for -O0 but not when using the pragma: /* Inlining does not work if not optimizing,

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #9 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:29:03 UTC --- I just tested on my Linux box and I am getting the results you suggest for -O2 and -O3. It is finding issues with -O, -Os, and -O1, but I think that is my problem (barking

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #10 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:31:06 UTC --- off-topic, but I added myself to the cc-list but don't get copies of my own submissions, is that the way gcc bugzilla behaves (would be different than redhat's for fedora)?

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-03 03:32:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) off-topic, but I added myself to the cc-list but don't get copies of my own submissions, is that the way gcc bugzilla behaves

[Bug preprocessor/51391] pragma GCC diag ignored then warning of Winline activates -fno-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391 --- Comment #12 from pnewell at cs dot cmu.edu 2011-12-03 03:36:51 UTC --- changed preferences, thanks

[Bug c++/48075] infinite loop when compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48075 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com 2011-12-03 03:53:02 UTC --- Created attachment 25976 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25976 reduced and without transaction relaxed I am hesitating to mark it

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #4 from John Regehr regehr at cs dot utah.edu 2011-12-03 07:01:50 UTC --- Created attachment 25977 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25977 smaller test case