http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51594
Bug #: 51594
Summary: gcov-dump: cannot find -lstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51589
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51595
Bug #: 51595
Summary: math libraryb not works
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51596
Bug #: 51596
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 6
can not throw but has an EH edge with
-fnon-call-exceptions
Classification: Unclassified
Produc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51597
Bug #: 51597
Summary: math libraryb not works
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51490
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-17
11:21:14 UTC ---
Works in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-12-17 11:27:40
UTC ---
Looks like some kind of race condition..
E.g. what about: STOP calls exit(), which leads to the library destructor being
called, which calls close_units(), which closes each open u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-17
11:31:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The testcases use "target c++11" target selector. This selector is not known
> on 4.6 and earler branches. The testcases fail as following on 4.6 branc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 11:39:53 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Dec 17 11:39:49 2011
New Revision: 182433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182433
Log:
2011-12-17 Tom de Vries
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 11:39:47 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Dec 17 11:39:43 2011
New Revision: 182432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182432
Log:
2011-12-17 Tom de Vries
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-17 12:49:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26119
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26119
res_hconf.c.221r.mach, using Andrew's patch
(In reply to comment #13)
> I think my patch f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51578
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-17
13:20:47 UTC ---
This pr seems related to (or a duplicate of) pr47168.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47168
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-17
13:23:11 UTC ---
There are good books by Josuttis and Austern, or the SGI docs online. Our docs
could definitely improved, but there are other ways to get the info you want,
if you look for it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-17
13:26:04 UTC ---
Or of course you can look at the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51597
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51416
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
13:51:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Dec 17 13:51:51 2011
New Revision: 182435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182435
Log:
PR c++/51416
* init.c (build_value_init_noc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51416
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
13:52:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Dec 17 13:52:02 2011
New Revision: 182436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182436
Log:
PR c++/51416
* init.c (build_value_init_noc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
14:23:20 UTC ---
Oops. Fixed, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51416
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51598
Bug #: 51598
Summary: Missing dependency on net/net.lo causes bootstrap
failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9539
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2011-12-17 16:07:24
UTC ---
No idea. I've tested this on my box (for 4.5.x and for 4.6.x) and don't get
this failure at all. Shared version works as good as the static one.
So I assume that here something is broken
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48713
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
Bug #: 51599
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-17 17:05:58 UTC ---
The SGI documentation clarifies all issues well enough indeed. I wonder
whether it would be a good thing to put a reference to SGI in the documentation
index (with a warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600
Bug #: 51600
Summary: ice in estimate_local_effects
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51601
Bug #: 51601
Summary: ice in verify_live_on_entry
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51594
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51589
--- Comment #5 from Walter Spector 2011-12-17
19:04:12 UTC ---
It seems like intent information should be available when the procedures are
USE associated, as opposed to the internal procedures. However gfortran does
not diagnose that case eithe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51587
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
19:26:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Dec 17 19:26:46 2011
New Revision: 182441
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182441
Log:
PR c++/51587
* decl.c (start_enum): Avoid u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51587
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2011-12-17 20:02:27
UTC ---
Did you use --disable-target-libitm?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51586
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
20:15:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Dec 17 20:15:39 2011
New Revision: 182442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182442
Log:
PR c++/51586
* parser.c (cp_parser_check_cl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51586
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51602
Bug #: 51602
Summary: Segmentation fault: internal compiler error on error
message (I think)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
--- Comment #5 from Magnus Granberg 2011-12-17
20:30:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 26122
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26122
switches with separated form -D and -U
This patch make the -D and -U switches with separated form
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-12-17 20:33:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Did you use --disable-target-libitm?
I used
--prefix=/usr/local --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared
--with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-12-17 20:37:00
UTC ---
C++ compiler is disabled for stage 1 and system C++ compiler
is used for stage 2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-17
20:39:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 26123
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26123
Patch
Patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01142.html waiting for
approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51602
--- Comment #1 from t1t0 2011-12-17 20:50:04 UTC ---
Same results with official 'stable' Ubuntu 10.10 packages:
- libboost1.42-dev
- libwt-dev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
Domingo Alvarez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mingodad at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
Magnus Granberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26122|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #4 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-17
21:21:55 UTC ---
This patch, committed on the 6th of December (r182056), must be included in the
snapshot of last Saturday (r182194). I tried with this
gcc-4.7-20111210.tar.bz2, and sorry, the result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51602
--- Comment #2 from t1t0 2011-12-17 21:23:58 UTC ---
There is no problem on my Debian squeeze stable (on chroot)
- gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
- wt-3.2.0 (libboost1.42-all-dev)
Details:
~/tmp# g++ -v -save-temps -lwthttp -lwt -o HelloW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603
Bug #: 51603
Summary: ERROR: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv-cast[34].C: syntax error in
target selector "target c++11"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson 2011-12-17
21:40:48 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Dec 17 21:40:45 2011
New Revision: 182445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182445
Log:
Revert "fix" for PR bootstrap/51072
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39107
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51604
Bug #: 51604
Summary: [C++11][constexpr] Initializing static constexpr data
members for class templates
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
Bug #: 51605
Summary: internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at
fortran/trans-stmt.c:984
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
--- Comment #1 from Dan Nagle 2011-12-17 22:45:42 UTC
---
Compiles with fort 12.1, nagfor has a different problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606
Bug #: 51606
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal
compiler error) on ppc*-*-*
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51604
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51604
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51588
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-18
00:55:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Dec 18 00:55:18 2011
New Revision: 182452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182452
Log:
PR c++/51588
* parser.c (cp_parser_ptr_oper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51588
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364
--- Comment #7 from Janis Johnson 2011-12-18
01:32:43 UTC ---
An executable with decimal float support is very big because the runtime
support is in static libraries, not in shared libraries (DLLs). That will
probably change if it ever gets wide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
70 matches
Mail list logo