[Bug fortran/51607] New: configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 Bug #: 51607 Summary: configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ; Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/51607] configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 --- Comment #1 from David d.barrows at me dot com 2011-12-18 09:25:27 UTC --- Created attachment 26127 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26127 fortran library config log

[Bug fortran/51607] configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/51608] New: [4.7 Regression][C++11] Unordered containers end(size_type) isn't constant time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51608 Bug #: 51608 Summary: [4.7 Regression][C++11] Unordered containers end(size_type) isn't constant time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/51608] [4.7 Regression][C++11] Unordered containers end(size_type) isn't constant time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51608 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/51589] Modification of loop index variable by intent(out) or intent(inout) procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51589 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51602] Segmentation fault: internal compiler error on error message (I think)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51602 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/51571] No named return value optimization while adding a dummy scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complexdouble produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51599] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599 Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51606] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr51015.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51606 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/51609] New: [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51609 Bug #: 51609 Summary: [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

Re: [Bug c/50111] New: Option -O0 cause Error: unsupported for `movq'

Same error building SDL 1.2.14 on msys/mingw using gcc 4.6.1. By default, no optimization flags are passed to gcc, adding -O2 makes the build succeed.

[Bug middle-end/51590] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:560

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51590 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2011-12-18 13:13:36 UTC --- gcc version 4.7.0 20111218 (experimental) [trunk revision 182459] (GCC) Fedora 16/x64 $ cat c51590.c #include sys/time.h extern void baz(char

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #5 from Dan Nagle danlnagle at me dot com 2011-12-18 13:13:48 UTC --- Citations from 10-007r1.pdf [185:17-18] says the polymorphic symbol_ptr takes the type of the type guard within the type guard. [171:7-8] says the associating

[Bug target/50588] gcc produce bad inlined code with -march=athlon -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50588 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-12-18 13:54:42 UTC --- The problem appears to occur in rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1, case REG. It returns false for any address formed by the frame or stack pointer plus an offset,

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/51607] configure: error: GNU fortran compiler is not working ;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51607 --- Comment #3 from David d.barrows at me dot com 2011-12-18 14:15:15 UTC --- any ideas of how to solve this?

[Bug libstdc++/51609] [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51609 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-18 14:47:50 UTC --- I'll look into this today...

[Bug c/51597] math libraryb not works

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51597 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-18 15:05:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) :~$gcc -lm rf.c try gcc rf.c -lm

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-12-18 16:39:24 UTC --- On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:01:13AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Dan, Stave: If possible, please also update your GCC to 2011-12-11

[Bug fortran/51610] New: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 Bug #: 51610 Summary: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/51599] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51599 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51072] [4.7 Regression] Build with --disable-bootstrap fails in libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-18 19:01:56 UTC --- In combine.c:try_combine, just after the Trying... dump output, there is: i0 = 0 i1 = 0 i2 = (set (reg/v:QI 43 [ status ]) (mem/v:QI (const_int 43

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Magnus Granberg zorry at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26124|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/33475] New warning suggestion: virtual functions called from constructors/destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33475 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/24058] g++ should warn about virtual methods called in constructors and destructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24058 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yuri at

[Bug c++/51611] New: [c++0x] ICE with non-static data member initializer and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51611 Bug #: 51611 Summary: [c++0x] ICE with non-static data member initializer and virtual base class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/51612] New: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with constexpr constructor and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51612 Bug #: 51612 Summary: [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with constexpr constructor and virtual base class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/51612] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with constexpr constructor and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51612 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 --- Comment #11 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-12-18 21:52:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26129 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26129 preprocessed source for another occurence I’m also getting one of these. Not

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

--no-recursion Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.7.0 20111218 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 --- Comment #13 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-12-18 22:10:13 UTC --- This is a regression: this works gcc-4.4 -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/buildd/libvirt-0.9.8/./src -I.. -I/tmp/buildd/libvirt-0.9.8/./gnulib/lib

[Bug c++/51613] New: Ambiguous function template instantiations as template argument are not rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51613 Bug #: 51613 Summary: Ambiguous function template instantiations as template argument are not rejected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2

[Bug c++/51614] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with ambiguous base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51614 Bug #: 51614 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with ambiguous base class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51614] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with ambiguous base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51614 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic,

[Bug libgcj/51615] New: Condition Variable queue state corruption and infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51615 Bug #: 51615 Summary: Condition Variable queue state corruption and infinite loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51612] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with constexpr constructor and virtual base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51612 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-18 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Dec 18 22:33:15 2011 New Revision: 182461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182461 Log: PR libstdc++/51540

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51364] C++ interoperability with ISO-C extension DFP types requires explicit typedefs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364 --- Comment #8 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-18 23:30:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) An executable with decimal float support is very big because the runtime support is in static libraries, not in shared libraries

[Bug middle-end/51252] FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/freq.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-12-19 00:08:54 UTC --- The attached patch seems to fix the tm test failures. However, it needs a bit more testing and I don't understand the registration magic. -- John David Anglin

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/51529] [OOP] gfortran.dg/class_to_type_1.f03 is miscompiled: Uninitialized variable used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug c++/51364] C++ interoperability with ISO-C extension DFP types requires explicit typedefs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 00:21:36 UTC --- There's nothing strange - the runtime code is in static libraries, so all the code for doing I/O must be linked into the executable if you use e.g. printf.

[Bug fortran/51616] New: [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 Bug #: 51616 Summary: [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/43437] ICE in CSE, during libgcc build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437 --- Comment #15 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-12-19 00:28:18 UTC --- Hi Mikael, thanks for caring, you seem to be everywhere ;-) Yes, it is reproducible with the cross-compilers I build using the standard procedure from

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 00:34:33 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 19 00:34:29 2011 New Revision: 182467 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182467 Log: PR libstdc++/50862

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-12-19 01:03:44 UTC --- On 18-Dec-11, at 7:55 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Well, the obvious questions is Does hpux11 have a sqrtl() in libm? No. It only has basic quad arithmetic.

[Bug target/51340] SH Target: Make -mfused-madd enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de 2011-12-19 01:29:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) Is there any particular reason why this should not be enabled by default for SH targets that support the FMAC

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-12-19 01:30:19 UTC --- On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:03:44AM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: Possibly, relates to PR 51057 I filed a separate bug because I

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 01:45:16 UTC --- Possibly, you referred to the wrong PR. PR 51057 is about the precision of IBM long double.

[Bug libstdc++/51083] TR1 [tr.c99.cmath.over] and C++11 [cmplx.over] overloads not constrained

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 01:49:14 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 19 01:49:08 2011 New Revision: 182468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182468 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug libstdc++/51083] TR1 [tr.c99.cmath.over] and C++11 [cmplx.over] overloads not constrained

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 01:49:59 UTC --- backported for 4.6.3

[Bug libstdc++/48933] Infinite recursion in tr1/cmath functions with complex parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48933 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 01:52:05 UTC --- This has also been partially fixed for 4.6.3 by backporting the fix for bug 51083

[Bug fortran/51616] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-12-19 02:21:34 UTC --- On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:45:16AM +, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616 --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/51609] [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51609 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 02:24:24 UTC --- While I agree the code is reasonable, I think an LWG issue is needed, because I don't think GCC's behaviour is in conflict with the standard. I don't read

[Bug c++/51364] C++ interoperability with ISO-C extension DFP types requires explicit typedefs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51364 --- Comment #10 from Domingo Alvarez mingodad at gmail dot com 2011-12-19 02:25:16 UTC --- Created attachment 26131 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26131 Program to show that gcc doesn't generate good code size Here is a

[Bug testsuite/51603] ERROR: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv-cast[34].C: syntax error in target selector target c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug testsuite/51128] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51617] New: [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Bug #: 51617 Summary: [C++0x] async(f) isn't. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #1 from Dave Abrahams dave at boostpro dot com 2011-12-19 05:11:20 UTC --- I should add this (non-normative, but still) note from [futures.async]: [ Note: If this policy is specified together with other policies, such as when using a

[Bug c++/51489] constexpr not working consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51489 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 05:57:58 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Dec 19 05:57:52 2011 New Revision: 182470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182470 Log: PR c++/51489 *

[Bug c++/51489] constexpr not working consistently

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51489 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/51618] New: synchronous futures are slow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 Bug #: 51618 Summary: synchronous futures are slow Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/51609] [C++11] unique_ptrconst T[]::reset rejects cv-compatible argument pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51609 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-12-19 07:07:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) While I agree the code is reasonable, I think an LWG issue is needed, because I don't think GCC's behaviour is in

[Bug c++/51619] New: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Bug #: 51619 Summary: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51619] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/51620] New: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 Bug #: 51620 Summary: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51620] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with private destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51620 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic,

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 --- Comment #26 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2011-12-19 07:36:33 UTC --- Just for the record: gcc-4.7-20111210 works (with --enable-obsolete of course).

[Bug c++/51621] New: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr and array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51621 Bug #: 51621 Summary: [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr and array class member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/51621] [c++0x] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr and array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51621 Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|