[Bug fortran/51758] ICE with optional arguments of elemental procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/23383] builtin array operator new is not marked with malloc attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-01-05 08:39:57 UTC --- On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #18 from davidxl

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 --- Comment #2 from James Kanze james.kanze at gmail dot com 2012-01-05 08:45:22 UTC --- I'd miss PR 51294. My report is almost certainly a duplicate of this one. It's a minor bug, in that it only affects warnings, but it does make -Wconversion

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug bootstrap/51648] [4.7 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 09:32:56 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 5 09:32:52 2012 New Revision: 182902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182902 Log: PR bootstrap/51648

[Bug c++/51759] New: miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 Bug #: 51759 Summary: miscompile writes past end of bitfield Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/51759] miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 --- Comment #1 from nobled at dreamwidth dot org 2012-01-05 09:35:51 UTC --- Created attachment 26244 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26244 output of `gcc -v -save-temps`

[Bug c++/51759] miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 --- Comment #2 from nobled at dreamwidth dot org 2012-01-05 09:38:45 UTC --- Created attachment 26245 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26245 pre-processed file (gzip-compressed)

[Bug c++/51757] friend defined inside class and declared inside main linker error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/51759] [4.5 Regression] miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/51757] friend defined inside class and declared inside main linker error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug c++/51757] friend defined inside class and declared inside main linker error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51757 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 10:42:56 UTC --- Also, if there's no definition, why would it link when -fkeep-inline-functions is used? My guess would be that the call in main doesn't mark the inline

[Bug fortran/51638] gfortran optimization breaks a single variable used as both input and output for subroutine call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638 --- Comment #6 from Sebastien Bardeau bardeau at iram dot fr 2012-01-05 10:43:52 UTC --- Dear all, (In reply to comment #4) Your Fortran code is invalid. We have a clear diagnostic. The bug is in your code not the Fortran compiler. This

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Bug #: 51760 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 10:54:42 UTC --- Created attachment 26246 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26246 preprocessed source

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/51761] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Bug #: 51761 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug debug/51762] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug debug/51762] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762 Bug #: 51762 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2231 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 11:41:56 UTC --- Reduced testcase: extern inline __attribute__ ((always_inline)) void * memmove (void *dest, const void *src, __SIZE_TYPE__ len) { return

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 11:48:28 UTC --- This is because likely_value says VARYING for __builtin___memmove_chk (a, b_1, 0, D.1724_7) if b_1 is not already CONSTANT. But we evaluate it with

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 11:49:06 UTC --- Or simply return CONSTANT for all builtins.

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51763] New: SEVERE ERROR: Symbol C_BSTAT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51763 Bug #: 51763 Summary: SEVERE ERROR: Symbol C_BSTAT Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 3.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug debug/51762] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51763] SEVERE ERROR: Symbol C_BSTAT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51763 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug debug/51762] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51762 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 12:58:11 UTC --- Seems cross-jumping during csa pass cross-jumps the two noret calls, eventhough they have different args size depths.

[Bug lto/41576] LTO complains about mismatches in common sections

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41576 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 13:28:37 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 5 13:28:34 2012 New Revision: 182907 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182907 Log: 2012-01-05 Richard

[Bug lto/41576] LTO complains about mismatches in common sections

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41576 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/51472] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid rhs for gimple memory store with -fgnu-tm --param tm-max-aggregate-size=32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 13:36:37 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Jan 5 13:36:32 2012 New Revision: 182908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182908 Log: PR middle-end/51472

[Bug fortran/41227] COMMON block, BIND(C) and LTO interoperability issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41227 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 13:37:09 UTC --- This is still not fixed (at least by design - bind_c_coms.f90/bind_c_coms_driver.c passes with -flto now). Can somebody produce a reduced testcase pair

[Bug middle-end/51472] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid rhs for gimple memory store with -fgnu-tm --param tm-max-aggregate-size=32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51759] [4.5 Regression] miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 13:41:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 5 13:41:34 2012 New Revision: 182909 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182909 Log: 2012-01-05 Richard

[Bug target/51685] FAIL: gcc.dg/tm/pr51472.c (internal compiler error) on ppc*-*-*, s390*-*-*, spu-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51685 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/51472] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid rhs for gimple memory store with -fgnu-tm --param tm-max-aggregate-size=32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps

[Bug middle-end/51764] New: mudflap does not work with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764 Bug #: 51764 Summary: mudflap does not work with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/29615] Class can't be friend of itself?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29615 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.6 Target

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at redhat dot com 2012-01-05 14:03:22 UTC --- OK. Jason

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:11:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) At the moment I'm confused, however, because I don't understand if the patch linked by Manuel in PR51294 (maybe we can consolidate

[Bug other/51171] XFAIL: libitm.c/reentrant.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:14:34 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Thu Jan 5 14:14:29 2012 New Revision: 182911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182911 Log: PR other/51171

[Bug other/51171] XFAIL: libitm.c/reentrant.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51638] gfortran optimization breaks a single variable used as both input and output for subroutine call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51638 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:26:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Fortran code is invalid. This code is like it is since its first commit on 11-Jun-93 This does not mean that was and/or is valid.

[Bug middle-end/51752] trans-mem: publication safety violated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:30:15 UTC --- Ok, I'm a complete neophyte on this, but that seems very restrictive. Does that mean that basically we can't hoist any loads inside a transaction...ever?

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:50:38 UTC --- Created attachment 26250 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26250 Another failing variant, with allocatables This is not fixed by the patch

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 14:51:26 UTC --- Created attachment 26252 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26252 Another failing variant, with pointers This is not fixed by the patch

[Bug lto/51765] New: Testsuite ICEs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765 Bug #: 51765 Summary: Testsuite ICEs with -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/50490] ICE when compiling libglib2.0 with LTO, tree code 'optimization_node' is not supported in LTO streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50490 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/51766] New: [4.7 regression] sync_fetch_and_xxx atomicity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51766 Bug #: 51766 Summary: [4.7 regression] sync_fetch_and_xxx atomicity Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/51766] [4.7 regression] sync_fetch_and_xxx atomicity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51766 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51764] mudflap does not work with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 15:08:47 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 5 15:08:42 2012 New Revision: 182913 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182913 Log: 2012-01-05 Richard

[Bug middle-end/51764] mudflap does not work with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51764 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 15:10:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 5 15:10:26 2012 New Revision: 182914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182914 Log: PR middle-end/51761

[Bug lto/51765] Testsuite ICEs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51761] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4241

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51761 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51767] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with degenerated asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767 Bug #: 51767 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with degenerated asm goto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/51767] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with degenerated asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/51294] spurious warning from -Wconversion in C and C++ in conditional expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51294 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||james.kanze

[Bug tree-optimization/42283] regression: ICE when bootstrapping trunk with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42283 Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50490] ICE when compiling libglib2.0 with LTO, tree code 'optimization_node' is not supported in LTO streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50490 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 15:44:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 5 15:43:54 2012 New Revision: 182917 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182917 Log: 2012-01-05 Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/51767] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with degenerated asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51767 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug middle-end/51768] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768 Bug #: 51768 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid asm goto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug middle-end/51768] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #4 from Frederick Roth f-roth at megaera dot de 2012-01-05 15:55:30 UTC --- this still happens with version 4.6.2. Can someone reconfirm this?

[Bug middle-end/51768] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51768 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/51769] New: bootstrap fails when using -O2 -funswitch-loops -floop-flatten

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51769 Bug #: 51769 Summary: bootstrap fails when using -O2 -funswitch-loops -floop-flatten Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/51769] bootstrap fails when using -O2 -funswitch-loops -floop-flatten

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51769 --- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2012-01-05 16:03:06 UTC --- Created attachment 26255 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26255 pre-processed source of the file that triggers the ICE commandline to trigger the

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 16:16:29 UTC --- I can reproduce the segfault when compiling both the testcase from comment #8 and the original unreduced test case on the 4.6 branch but not on my trunk

[Bug c++/51541] ICE on ill-formed alias template declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51541 --- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-01-05 16:58:29 UTC --- A candidate fix has been posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00256.html

[Bug c++/48680] -Weffc++ update description for 2nd and 3rd edition of Scott Meyers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48680 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-06-28 01:34:16 |2012-01-05

[Bug c++/22395] -Weffc++ shouldn't warn about non-virtual dtor of private subclasses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 17:13:02 UTC --- private inheritance doesn't mean the destructor can't be called with the wrong static type class Foo { public: ~Foo() {} virtual void f() { } };

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/51648] [4.7 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51648 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/49936] [4.7 Regression] IRA handles CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS poorly, + spills to memory on 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/48668] [4.6 regression] COMDAT Group signature not emitted in group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-05 17:16:21 UTC --- --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 09:41:13 UTC --- Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux, nor

[Bug rtl-optimization/49936] [4.7 Regression] IRA handles CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS poorly, + spills to memory on 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936 --- Comment #10 from Sandra Loosemore sandra at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-05 17:31:39 UTC --- My notes are that the unnecessary register moves in the loop have been present since at least GCC 4.3, so it is not a 4.6-4.7 regression, at least.

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 17:41:47 UTC --- Ian, ping?

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.7 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/48308] [4.6/4.7 Regression] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 17:48:11 UTC --- Ramana (or some other ARM maintainer), could you please try to implement this? Thanks.

[Bug c++/23383] builtin array operator new is not marked with malloc attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #20 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2012-01-05 18:11:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #18 from

[Bug c++/41090] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Using static label reference in c++ class constructor produces wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/23383] builtin array operator new is not marked with malloc attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/23383] builtin array operator new is not marked with malloc attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383 --- Comment #22 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2012-01-05 18:54:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) But can't a valid code also compare the result from realloc with the old pointer, and if they are equal, do something, otherwise do

[Bug rtl-optimization/49710] [4.7 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 19:25:19 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 5 19:25:14 2012 New Revision: 182919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182919 Log: PR middle-end/49710

[Bug rtl-optimization/49710] [4.7 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/44777] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with -fprofile-use in gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 19:34:08 UTC --- OK, so the problem is separating the actual two builtins, not that profiling would choke on the multiple returns now? In that case I think the patch is OK

[Bug middle-end/44777] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with -fprofile-use in gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-05 19:54:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 5 19:54:16 2012 New Revision: 182920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182920 Log: PR middle-end/44777

[Bug middle-end/51770] New: dump gimple lineno when dumping bb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51770 Bug #: 51770 Summary: dump gimple lineno when dumping bb Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/44777] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV with -fprofile-use in gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7|[4.4/4.5/4.6

  1   2   >