[Bug c++/51773] New: error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 Bug #: 51773 Summary: error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/37651] __sync_bool_compare_and_swap creates wrong code with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37651 Andrew Haley aph at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/43366] [OOP][F2008] Intrinsic assign to polymorphic variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 10:24:24 UTC --- As litmus test: BT_CLASS version of PR 50981: Passing an unallocated/unassociated [or absent + nonpointer/nonallocatable] BT_CLASS variable or a

[Bug rtl-optimization/51774] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 Bug #: 51774 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm Classification: Unclassified

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 10:50:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) /home/vries/local/glibc-arm/base/src/gcc-mainline/libitm/local_type_traits:886:52: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 10:51:51 UTC --- Looks related to: + [BZ #13529] + * assert/assert.h (static_assert): Define. + diff --git a/assert/assert.h b/assert/assert.h index 841f435..4022e28 100644 ---

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 10:56:31 UTC --- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13529 should be reproducible with: #include assert.h static_assert( true, valid C++ ); this could be fixed

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 10:57:15 UTC --- Ok, I can reproduce this now. Compared to 64-bit cc1 the difference starts during the bbpart pass, particularly when partition_hot_cold_basic_blocks invokes df

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 11:06:50 UTC --- this should be reported to glibc, like http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13566

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 11:06:59 UTC --- Draft patch. (It uses gfc_expr_attr to allow for pointer/allocatable components. I also tried to take BT_CLASS into account.) (This patch is a side effect

[Bug fortran/51758] ICE with optional arguments of elemental procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 11:29:32 UTC --- The assert rse.ss == gfc_ss_terminator is not fulfilled in gfc_trans_assignment_1. If one manually sets rse.see = gfc_ss_terminator in the debugger, the

[Bug tree-optimization/51694] [4.7 Regression] ICE while compiling alliance package

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51694 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-06 11:47:15 UTC --- On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: does glibc also define macros for alignof, true, false, bool etc. in C++ mode?

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 12:08:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) We already discussed C++ semantics for those headers, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg00847.html. Yep, I

[Bug rtl-optimization/51774] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/51751] COMPLEX16 tests fail in Lapack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51751 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-06 13:10:24 UTC --- It works for me with trunk r182883 on powerpc-apple-darwin9: with -O0 -- LAPACK TESTING SUMMARY -- Processing LAPACK Testing

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-06 13:13:41 UTC --- Thus by 'opposite' of 'complete' you mean that nothing should be *added* to the patch, instead something removed from it? Great. You see I meant

[Bug lto/51774] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/51774] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/51772] --enable-clocale=generic makes unsafe assumptions about ctype_base::mask

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-06 13:20:33 UTC --- Maybe I'm misunderstanding the tone of your PR, and certainly Benjamin knows better than me because he invented this stuff, but I don't think the blame

[Bug tree-optimization/51759] [4.5 Regression] miscompile writes past end of bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51759 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775 Bug #: 51775 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.7 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 13:49:08 UTC --- I think this is an ordering problem. When not using lto, assemble_alias is called on the weakref __gthrw_pthread_once with pthread_once target (etc.) early,

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.7 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/51772] --enable-clocale=generic makes unsafe assumptions about ctype_base::mask

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 14:00:52 UTC --- Sorry for the tone, it might be that this is only really broken on netbsd, and maybe using the ieee model there would fix the test failure - I need to

[Bug middle-end/51752] trans-mem: publication safety violated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51752 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkorb at gnu dot

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/48660] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 14:56:52 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Fri Jan 6 14:56:46 2012 New Revision: 182955 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182955 Log: gcc/

[Bug middle-end/48660] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 14:59:51 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Fri Jan 6 14:59:47 2012 New Revision: 182956 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182956 Log: gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #25 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 15:09:46 UTC --- RE: Comment #16 through Comment #23 -- Do not use sed. There is no compelling reason to do so. Please read the fixincludes README, wherein sed is disparaged. I'll add to that

[Bug c++/39970] gcc accepts the . dot operator in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39970 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #26 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-01-06 15:22:09 UTC --- On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +, bkorb at gnu dot org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #25 from

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-06 15:28:16 UTC --- On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 15:30:23 UTC --- I'd say: c_fix_arg = __attribute__((__noreturn__)); would be better. Thanks for writing a comment that has just the important facts in it and no emotions.

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 15:33:16 UTC --- I've already glanced over them and added one comment, I'll go through them properly asap

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-06 15:51:20 UTC --- On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I'm not sure if for -D_GNU_SOURCE we want a ::gets prototype in C++, it would be

[Bug fortran/51758] ICE with optional arguments of elemental procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 15:55:36 UTC --- Draft patch. --- trans-expr.c(revision 182957) +++ trans-expr.c(working copy) @@ -3408,6 +3408,9 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se,

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #29 from Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 15:57:51 UTC --- Bootstrap in progress with the below. Additions: - Jakub's recent comment on c_fix_arg. - extend mach to match FreeBSD10.* to FreeBSD19.* (Should give

[Bug target/48308] [4.6/4.7 Regression] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 16:02:49 UTC --- I think it would be better to just generate a single insn early on and then to split it once the loop optimizers have had a chance to run. Then the

[Bug preprocessor/51776] New: fixincludes hacks around a C++ deficiency

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776 Bug #: 51776 Summary: fixincludes hacks around a C++ deficiency Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #30 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 16:10:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) I'll remember to add a comment to this PR once ... I fully intend to remember, too. Probably the appropriate thing is a new bug #51776

[Bug c++/51773] error building libitm/aatree.cc on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 16:12:00 UTC --- Sure, we'd need some coordination between glibc and libstdc++, or just a glibc version check and defining the std::gets prototype in libstdc++.

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #32 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-01-06 16:14:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) +c_fix_arg = __attribute__\(\(__noreturn__\)\); In a double quoted string, the backslash quotes always quote the character that follows. Here,

[Bug bootstrap/51705] [4.7 Regression] FreeBSD uses unsupported C++11 features when __cplusplus == 201103L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #31 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-01-06 16:11:08 UTC --- On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:30:23PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705 --- Comment #27

[Bug fortran/46328] [OOP] type-bound operator call with non-trivial polymorphic operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug lto/51774] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 16:48:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 6 16:48:52 2012 New Revision: 182959 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182959 Log: PR lto/51774 *

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt

[Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/41233] Templated conversion operator produces symbol name that won't demangle

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41233 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/46328] [OOP] type-bound operator call with non-trivial polymorphic operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 18:06:37 UTC --- The following patchlet fixes the issue of comment 2 [or at least, the program now compiles]; it does not fix the issue of comment 0 / comment 4. Regarding

[Bug libstdc++/51772] --enable-clocale=generic makes unsafe assumptions about ctype_base::mask

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51516] [trans-mem] problem with TM clone aliases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51516 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/47450] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Anonymous top-level classes assigned to static members fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47450 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug lto/51774] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-* c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto -fgnu-tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51774 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/42643] may be used uninitialized compiled with -Wall -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42643 --- Comment #2 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com 2012-01-06 20:08:54 UTC --- Created attachment 26259 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26259 Live test case (file from Mozilla's NSS package) Even when using gcc-4.6 (more

[Bug debug/51746] Segfault in cselib_preserved_value_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 20:21:00 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jan 6 20:20:55 2012 New Revision: 182963 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182963 Log: PR debug/51746 *

[Bug c++/51777] New: Errors message show unsigned long template parameters as signed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51777 Bug #: 51777 Summary: Errors message show unsigned long template parameters as signed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51322] [C++11] wrong mangling with argument packs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 21:39:51 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 6 21:39:43 2012 New Revision: 182970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182970 Log: PR c++/6057 PR

[Bug c++/6057] expression mangling doesn't work for operator new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6057 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 21:39:50 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 6 21:39:43 2012 New Revision: 182970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182970 Log: PR c++/6057 PR

[Bug c++/48051] sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48051 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 21:39:50 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 6 21:39:43 2012 New Revision: 182970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182970 Log: PR c++/6057 PR

[Bug c++/50855] [C++0x] Name mangling for late return types invoking constructors not implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50855 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 21:39:51 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 6 21:39:43 2012 New Revision: 182970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182970 Log: PR c++/6057 PR

[Bug middle-end/51778] New: ICE during bootstrap when adding -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores to boo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51778 Bug #: 51778 Summary: ICE during bootstrap when adding -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores to boo Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug testsuite/51655] FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/memcpy-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51655 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 21:58:47 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Fri Jan 6 21:58:44 2012 New Revision: 182972 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182972 Log: PR testsuite/51655 *

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 22:05:06 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 6 22:05:03 2012 New Revision: 182973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182973 Log: PR gcov-profile/50127

[Bug target/47333] [4.6/4.7 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 22:06:12 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 6 22:06:08 2012 New Revision: 182974 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182974 Log: PR target/47333 *

[Bug gcov-profile/50127] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs on several targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2 with SUN as

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 regression]|[4.6 regression]

[Bug preprocessor/51067] cpp.texi Line Control node not mentioning #, trailing integers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51067 --- Comment #5 from karl at freefriends dot org 2012-01-06 22:43:44 UTC --- may I suggest an xref in Line Control? That was the obvious place to look. To me.

[Bug c++/47450] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Anonymous top-level classes assigned to static members fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47450 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Bug debug/51746] Segfault in cselib_preserved_value_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51746 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/51655] FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/memcpy-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51655 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug testsuite/51655] FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/memcpy-1.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51655 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47450] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Anonymous top-level classes assigned to static members fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47450 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-06 23:19:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 6 23:19:05 2012 New Revision: 182975 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182975 Log: DR 686 PR c++/47450

[Bug c++/47450] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Anonymous top-level classes assigned to static members fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47450 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 00:13:10 UTC --- This was solved (or became dormant) with revision 171450 on trunk: 2011-03-25 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de * passes.c

[Bug testsuite/51703] FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_real_boz_[345].f90 -O (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51703 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/51603] ERROR: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv-cast[34].C: syntax error in target selector target c++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/45682] missing namespace parent die when using -gdwarf-4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682 Cary Coutant ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gcc

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-01-07 01:31:36 UTC --- Created attachment 26260 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26260 Possible patch I did not like the first approach because I think that checking

[Bug fortran/51779] New: gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 Bug #: 51779 Summary: gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including algorithm pollute global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #3 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-01-07 04:14:06 UTC --- Yes I'm new to GCC :) If it won't be able to make it in to 4.7, will it be able to make it in to 4.7.1 or 4.8?

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 --- Comment #2 from Tim Williams zippy at anl dot gov 2012-01-07 07:31:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) What is the complete path for the gcc sources? /Users/zippy/Downloads/gcc-4.6.2/ What is the complete path for where you tried to