[Bug tree-optimization/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 --- Comment #12 from Andi Kleen 2012-01-08 01:37:29 UTC --- LTO saves the options in the object files and collects them for the final link. This works as far as I know. The only thing it cannot handle is different incompatible options in differe

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-08 00:16:28 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Jan 8 00:16:18 2012 New Revision: 182984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182984 Log: PR tree-optimization/51600 * ipa-inline-an

[Bug tree-optimization/51600] [4.7 Regression] ice in estimate_local_effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51600 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51680] [4.7 Regression] g++ 4.7 fails to inline trivial template stuff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-07 23:35:13 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jan 7 23:35:08 2012 New Revision: 182983 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182983 Log: PR tree-optimization/51680 * ipa-inline.c

[Bug fortran/51790] New: Broken ambiguity check when combining generic with nongeneric procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51790 Bug #: 51790 Summary: Broken ambiguity check when combining generic with nongeneric procedures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug fortran/51788] Unstable gfc_verify_binding_labels check for a binding label which collides with a global entity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51788 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07 23:15:58 UTC --- The problems is that: if ((sym->attr.use_assoc && bind_c_sym->mod_name && strcmp (bind_c_sym->mod_name, sym->module) != 0) is not true as the gsym and the

[Bug c++/51789] New: GCC does not consider SFINAE in template parameter list of template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51789 Bug #: 51789 Summary: GCC does not consider SFINAE in template parameter list of template parameter pack Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Stat

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-07 22:40:07 UTC --- > Looks like an OS bug, not GCC bug, if getenv segfaults... Well, revision 182587 uses the same OS and does not segfault. Also 'exit (0)' is used in many tests that pass.

[Bug tree-optimization/51084] bounds checking not optimized to a single comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51084 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51219] ICE with designated initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51433] constexpr caching leads to incorrect dynamic initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51433 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/51402] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51402 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code --- Comment #11 fr

[Bug target/50572] unstable performance on Atom due to loop alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50766] Binutils 2.22.51 rejects bmi2 pext operation with memory operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50720] "deprecated" doesn't work as expected for functions returning pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50720 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/51788] New: Unstable gfc_verify_binding_labels check for a binding label which collides with a global entity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51788 Bug #: 51788 Summary: Unstable gfc_verify_binding_labels check for a binding label which collides with a global entity Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07 22:15:51 UTC --- *** Bug 35161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|--

[Bug fortran/35161] [F2008] allow procedures with same binding label (invalid in F2003)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35161 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07 22:14:15 UTC --- See also discussion starting at http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2008-December/002123.html Fortran 2003 has in "16.1 Scope of global identifiers" "Program units, common blocks, e

[Bug middle-end/40135] using alias-set zero for union accesses necessary because of RTL alias oracle

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 --- Comment #20 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-01-07 21:37:20 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 7 21:37:15 2012 New Revision: 182982 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182982 Log: PR bootstrap/51725 * cselib.c (new_elt_loc_list

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug middle-end/40386] wrong code generation for several SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks (lucas, mgrid, face, applu, apsi) with -O1 -fno-ira-share-spill-slots

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/51787] [4.7.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1410

from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07 21:07:39 UTC --- Works for me with GCC 4.7.0 20120107 (experimental) [trunk revision 182980] on x86-64-linux (with and without -m32; without one gets the error "cast from 'void*' to 'size_t' loses precision"). I used the following f

[Bug bootstrap/51787] [4.7.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1410

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51787 --- Comment #1 from Douglas Mencken 2012-01-07 20:48:15 UTC --- Created attachment 26268 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26268 pre-processed output of last failed operation (compressed)

[Bug bootstrap/51787] New: [4.7.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1410

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51787 Bug #: 51787 Summary: [4.7.0 Regression] internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1410 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 --- Comment #8 from Tim Williams 2012-01-07 20:24:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > FYI, the miscompilation of MPFR 3.1.0's tis support by clang is resolved in > Xcode 4.2.1. > This was radar://10291355, "Xcode 4.2 miscompiles tls support in

[Bug c++/51785] gets not anymore declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug tree-optimization/51783] Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783 --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-01-07 19:04:13 UTC --- Hmm, here I disagree. See other ==/!= comparison missed optimization. Eg for 'x == (signed type)((unsigned type) x + z)' the transformation is profitable, as it allows later on reduction

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/51783] Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-07 18:57:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, IMHO it is still valid in the case of argument of ne/eq comparison, as > indeed here sign and wrap-around doesn't matter. Maybe for this exact IR but

[Bug tree-optimization/51783] Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-01-07 18:55:05 UTC --- Well, IMHO it is still valid in the case of argument of ne/eq comparison, as indeed here sign and wrap-around doesn't matter.

[Bug tree-optimization/51783] Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-07 18:25:19 UTC --- I think that would be an invalid transformation except when -fwrapv is used. The reason is: x.0_2 = (unsigned int) x_1(D); D.2715_4 = z_3(D) + x.0_2; <--- wrapping semantics c_5

[Bug tree-optimization/51680] [4.7 Regression] g++ 4.7 fails to inline trivial template stuff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

Product Samples .

Hello , We are currently searching for high-tech manufacturers and suppliers who are able to produce and supply the exact quality products on our website. Aicom group international is a leading industrial and commercial company based in vietnam founded in 1987, and has been existing in b

[Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120 --- Comment #5 from Volker Reichelt 2012-01-07 16:21:08 UTC --- Well, "decltype" has the same problems, so I opened a new bug report, see PR51786.

[Bug c++/51786] New: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 Bug #: 51786 Summary: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/51680] [4.7 Regression] g++ 4.7 fails to inline trivial template stuff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2012-01-07 16:11:50 UTC --- Well, the problem here is that we compile with -O2 and function is not declared inline. Conequetely GCC inlines only when it thinks code size will shrink. Inliner always works one step

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl 2012-01-07 16:02:51 UTC --- On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 07:31:46AM +, zippy at anl dot gov wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 > > --- Comment #2 from Tim Williams 2012-01-07 07:31:46 > UT

[Bug gcov-profile/51715] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-13.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot

[Bug gcov-profile/51717] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51785] New: gets not anymore declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 Bug #: 51785 Summary: gets not anymore declared Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug gcov-profile/51717] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-01-07 15:27:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Jan 7 15:27:15 2012 New Revision: 182981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182981 Log: PR gcov-profile/51715 PR gcov-profile

[Bug gcov-profile/51715] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-13.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-01-07 15:27:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Jan 7 15:27:15 2012 New Revision: 182981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182981 Log: PR gcov-profile/51715 PR gcov-profile

[Bug middle-end/51784] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 Bug #: 51784 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution,-fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-07 14:08:11 UTC --- I forgot to mention that there exist also unofficial binaries for MacOS at: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#MacOS Thus, that could be an alternative to fixing the MPFR issue

[Bug fortran/51779] gcc 4.6.2 build fails on Mac OS X Lion w/Xcode 4.2, with gfortran erorr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51779 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/51755] -Wconversion generates false warnings when the ternary operator is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51755 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-01-07 13:03:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Thus by 'opposite' of 'complete' you mean that nothing should be *added* to > the > patch, instead something removed from it? Great. You see I meant c

[Bug target/49857] Put constant switch-tables into flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:17:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26267 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26267 a-bug.c.150r.expand a-bug.c.150r.expand RTL dump, FYI As you can see in read_rgb_ok that move in

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:11:50 UTC --- Created attachment 26266 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26266 a-bug.c.149t.optimized a-bug.c.149t.optimized tree dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:11:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26265 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26265 a-bug.c.004t.gimple a-bug.c.004t.gimple tree-dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:09:41 UTC --- Created attachment 26264 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26264 a-bug.c.003t.original a-bug.c.003t.original tree-dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51783] New: Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51783 Bug #: 51783 Summary: Missed optimization for X ==/!= (signed type) ((unsigned type) Y + Z) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:08:25 UTC --- Created attachment 26263 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26263 a-bug.s (assembler output) read_rgb_ok uses LPM instructions to read data (okay) read_rgb_bug use

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:05:20 UTC --- Created attachment 26262 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26262 a-bug.c C source file triggering the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] New: Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 Bug #: 51782 Summary: Missing address-space information leads to wrong code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: addr-space, w

[Bug lto/50490] ICE when compiling libglib2.0 with LTO, tree code 'optimization_node' is not supported in LTO streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50490 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51781] New: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51781 Bug #: 51781 Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/51780] New: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51780 Bug #: 51780 Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollute global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f