[Bug tree-optimization/49959] ABS pattern is not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49959 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 08:03:40 UTC --- If we had a pass which was able to convert: bb 3: iftmp.0_6 = (long unsigned int) D.1708_4; goto bb 5; bb 4: D.1712_8 = -D.1708_4; iftmp.0_9 = (long

[Bug tree-optimization/29333] Jump threading getting in the way of PHI-OPT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50971] Only one loop detected when there should be two

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50971 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51415] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Broken diagnostic: 'vec_init_expr' not supported by dump_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51415 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51421] [c++0x] ICE with invalid use of auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51421 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/51422] [c++0x] ICE with invalid lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51422 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/51928] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in lookup_fnfields_idx_nolazy (search.c:1384) with -fgnu-tm on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51928 Bug #: 51928 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in lookup_fnfields_idx_nolazy (search.c:1384) with -fgnu-tm on invalid code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/35629] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-25.c scan-tree-dump-times profile fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/51916] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-3 c_lto_trans-mem-3_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-3_1.o link, -flto (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/51916] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-3 c_lto_trans-mem-3_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-3_1.o link, -flto (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 10:34:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) ... so this is a build/config issue - or, alternatively, the segment name can be specified as above since

[Bug middle-end/51929] New: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0 --param max-inline-insns-single=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 Bug #: 51929 Summary: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone --param ipa-cp-eval-threshold=0 --param

[Bug c++/51930] New: Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 Bug #: 51930 Summary: Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51931] New: No support for MIPS16 long branches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51931 Bug #: 51931 Summary: No support for MIPS16 long branches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/25973] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 --- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 11:34:08 UTC --- Created attachment 26402 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26402 patch to fix problem in comment 4 (In reply to comment #12) Tom, are you handling this?

[Bug fortran/50981] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong-code for scalarizing ELEMENTAL call with absent OPTIONAL argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-21 11:41:15 UTC --- Running the regression test suite gives: FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_1.f90 -O

[Bug c++/25973] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-21 11:57:42 UTC --- Great, thanks. I would recommend trying to do that before Stage 3 ends.

[Bug target/51882] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) when building Mesa on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882 --- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 12:29:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26403 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26403 reduced testcase Reduced testcase. Configured with :

[Bug target/51882] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 (unrecognizable insn) when building Mesa on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51882 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/51924] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -free -fno-rename-registers -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/51932] New: Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 Bug #: 51932 Summary: Cannot use std::errno with cerrno Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51930] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 14:06:51 UTC --- errno is required to be a macro, you can't use std::NULL either

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 --- Comment #2 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-01-21 14:10:15 UTC --- So then std::errno shouldn't compile, according to the standard? Because, googling std::errno shows me some people attempting to use std::errno.

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51924] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O -free -fno-rename-registers -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] New: [4.7 Regression] Wrong-code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 Bug #: 51933 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Wrong-code due to -free Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 Regression] Wrong-code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with cerrno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/46192] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code for renaming of volatile packed array with address clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 14:58:39 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 21 14:58:33 2012 New Revision: 183365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183365 Log: PR ada/46192

[Bug ada/46192] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code for renaming of volatile packed array with address clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 15:01:56 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 21 15:01:48 2012 New Revision: 183366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183366 Log: PR ada/46192

[Bug ada/46192] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code for renaming of volatile packed array with address clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 15:04:31 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 21 15:04:25 2012 New Revision: 183367 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183367 Log: PR ada/46192

[Bug ada/46192] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] wrong code for renaming of volatile packed array with address clause

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/51913] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] bug when submitting a class pointer to a subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 15:12:39 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 21 15:12:31 2012 New Revision: 183368 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183368 Log: 2012-01-21 Tobias Burnus

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 Regression] Wrong-code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 15:24:26 UTC --- Consider following 3 routines: unsigned long foo (unsigned short *s, int i) { unsigned short x = s[i]; if (x 0x211) return (unsigned char) x; asm

[Bug rtl-optimization/51924] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O -free -fno-rename-registers -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51924 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 Regression] Wrong-code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/51934] New: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 Bug #: 51934 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-* Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 regression] wrong code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 15:57:23 UTC --- Completely untested fix: --- gcc/ree.c.jj2011-12-28 10:52:44.0 +0100 +++ gcc/ree.c2012-01-21 16:55:27.290731139 +0100 @@ -776,6 +776,23 @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.6/4.7 Regression] m68k gcj-4.6 NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 --- Comment #4 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2012-01-21 16:04:41 UTC --- Mikael, you are amazing! I’m sort of sorry that I’ve led you to so much effort and fighting against bugs and build system issues. I’ve only ever built gcj with

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/51913] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] bug when submitting a class pointer to a subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 16:11:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 21 16:11:47 2012 New Revision: 183369 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183369 Log: 2012-01-21 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/51913] [4.6/4.7 Regression][OOP] bug when submitting a class pointer to a subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51913 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-21 16:15:52 UTC --- Also broken on 4.6 and 4.5 branches ... Mikael can you confirm that the failures are due to the warning 'cdecl' attribute directive ignored?

[Bug debug/45682] missing namespace parent die when using -gdwarf-4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45682 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2012-01-21 17:02:36 UTC --- Confirming it has fixed: -XFAIL: gdb.cp/static-method.exp: info addr A::func() (PRMS gcc/45682) +PASS: gdb.cp/static-method.exp: info addr A::func()

[Bug bootstrap/51935] New: Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 Bug #: 51935 Summary: Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50556] cannot save namelist group name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 17:32:15 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jan 21 17:32:12 2012 New Revision: 183370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183370 Log: 2012-01-21 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/50556] cannot save namelist group name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 17:37:40 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the bug reports.

[Bug c++/51936] New: template function not instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51936 Bug #: 51936 Summary: template function not instantiated Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/51040] ICE: RTL check: access of elt 1 of 'not' with last elt 0 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat, at ./genrtl.h:33 with __atomic_nand_fetch()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51040 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/48833] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr34415.c FAILs with -flto -fipa-cp-clone -fno-merge-constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48833 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0 ---

[Bug bootstrap/50461] mpfr.h found in mpfr-3.1.0/src instead of mpfr-3.0.1/. as previously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461 psmith at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psmith at gnu dot org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 --- Comment #1 from psmith at gnu dot org 2012-01-21 18:15:24 UTC --- Created attachment 26406 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26406 Handle both old and new MPFR dir layouts Added a new patch that works with both old and new

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 --- Comment #2 from psmith at gnu dot org 2012-01-21 18:17:23 UTC --- BTW, this is a duplicate of bug #50461

[Bug target/51871] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target

[Bug bootstrap/50461] mpfr.h found in mpfr-3.1.0/src instead of mpfr-3.0.1/. as previously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 18:23:20 UTC --- *** Bug 51935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 18:27:18 UTC --- The prerequisites page says: While any sufficiently new version of required tools usually work, library requirements are generally stricter. Newer versions

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 regression] wrong code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 18:40:23 UTC --- That unfortunately slightly pessimizes it. E.g. on i686-linux bootstrap on: ../../gcc/config/i386/i386.c ix86_memory_move_cost ../../gcc/config/i386/i386.c

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 --- Comment #5 from psmith at gnu dot org 2012-01-21 18:54:37 UTC --- It's fine to close this bug as a dup as it's later than the other, but note I've attached a fix to this bug (there's no fix attached to the other) so please don't lose the

[Bug fortran/51754] [OOP] ICE on valid with class arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51754 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 19:22:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) One additionally needs the following - otherwise, e.g., PR 41600 comment 1 fails at resolve time claiming that the type is not the

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name = exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 19:57:07 UTC --- (Those comments are for the example in comment 1) The ICE happens for: integer :: X = -999.0 where one calls gfc_trans_scalar_assign with ts.type ==

[Bug target/45771] Source operands for conditional moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45771 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/47698] CMOV accessing volatile memory with read side effect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51936] template function not instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51936 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 20:23:27 UTC --- The standard says in [expr.reinterpret.cast] A function pointer can be explicitly converted to a function pointer of a different type. The effect of calling a

[Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/50362] ICE on x86 architecture with -O2 or higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50362 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/40454] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] zlib is about 20% slower when compiled with GCC 4.4.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40454 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 20:32:14 UTC --- Can someone try to get new numbers?

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-01-21 21:15:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Also broken on 4.6 and 4.5 branches ... Mikael can you confirm that the failures are due to the warning 'cdecl' attribute

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 --- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 21:27:57 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Jan 21 21:27:49 2012 New Revision: 183376 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183376 Log: PR libstdc++/50982

[Bug rtl-optimization/40987] Wrong optimization with if-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51933] [4.7 regression] wrong code due to -free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51933 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug middle-end/28779] internal compiler error: in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:106

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28779 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/17805] too liberal operator lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-30 07:12:30 |2012-01-21 0:00

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/15357] [tree-ssa] combing if statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/25530] (unsigned / 2)*2 is not changed into unsigned ~1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25530 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/17805] too liberal operator lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-01-21 22:11:12 UTC --- This issue is starting to look like a darwin11-specific linker bug. If I build the 30_threads/recursive_mutex/try_lock/1.cc test case under Xcode 4.2 on

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/44642] bootstrap fails to build libgcc when gold is built (at least on Solaris_x86)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44642 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/46542] GCC 4.7 pending patches meta-bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/51937] New: [meta-bug] GCC 4.8 pending patches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51937 Bug #: 51937 Summary: [meta-bug] GCC 4.8 pending patches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority:

[Bug other/51937] [meta-bug] GCC 4.8 pending patches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51937 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/51938] New: missed optimization: 2 comparisons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51938 Bug #: 51938 Summary: missed optimization: 2 comparisons Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/25973] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-01-21 22:50:40 UTC --- Well, actually Stage 3 ended while I was in vacations. Sorry about the misleading note.

[Bug libstdc++/50982] AIX libstdc++ GTHREADS incompatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51577] dependent name lookup finds operator in global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-21 23:15:31 UTC --- The test just should use some attribute that is common to all targets, like __attribute__((noinline)) or similar, unless it didn't fail with that

[Bug bootstrap/51935] Configure fails on included mpc/mpfr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51935 --- Comment #6 from psmith at gnu dot org 2012-01-21 23:24:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26407 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26407 Fix typo

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 23:30:25 UTC --- You mean errors out? format attribute must have 3 arguments. Try leaf, or nothrow etc. attributes instead, format is a bad idea for a method that isn't

[Bug other/46542] GCC 4.7 pending patches meta-bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 23:43:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Closing as fixed as 4.7 is stage 4 now. Before closing this, all pending patches from 4.7 should be moved to the 4.8

[Bug other/46542] GCC 4.7 pending patches meta-bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 23:47:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) Closing as fixed as 4.7 is stage 4 now. Before closing this, all pending patches from 4.7 should

[Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-21 23:58:19 UTC --- You mean errors out? format attribute must have 3 arguments. Try leaf, or nothrow etc. attributes instead, format is a bad idea for a method that

[Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.6/4.7 Regression] m68k gcj-4.6 NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-01-22 00:46:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) It's triggered by Joseph Myers' Table-based default_options_optimization change in r165823:

[Bug tree-optimization/29333] Jump threading getting in the way of PHI-OPT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22 00:47:00 UTC --- This is the patch which I am testing: Index: gcc/passes.c === --- gcc/passes.c(revision

[Bug middle-end/51939] New: ICE: in compute_affine_dependence, at tree-data-ref.c:4103

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939 Bug #: 51939 Summary: ICE: in compute_affine_dependence, at tree-data-ref.c:4103 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >