http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||48829, 48483
--- Comment #3 from Andrew P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2012-02-09
05:40:15 UTC ---
the proposed patch fixes the libgo build; I don't see any regressions in the
testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52180
Bug #: 52180
Summary: [DR 1227] [C++11] need to remember whether a return
type was specified early or late
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-09
00:56:13 UTC ---
Backtrace for staticrootstest at -m64...
# gdb ./staticrootstestGNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1708) (Thu
Nov 3 21:59:02 UTC 2011)Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-09
00:46:21 UTC ---
Backtrace for thread_leak_test at -m64
# gdb ./thread_leak_testGNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1708) (Thu
Nov 3 21:59:02 UTC 2011)Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-09
00:40:19 UTC ---
A backtrace for the failing leak_test at -m64 looks identical...
# gdb ./leak_testGNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1708) (Thu Nov 3
21:59:02 UTC 2011)Copyright 2004 Free Sof
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-09
00:37:58 UTC ---
The problem is that netbsd's sed doesn't put a newline after a 'c' command, so
the two 'endif' here (from fixincl.x) don't get newlines after them:
/*
* Fix Command Arguments for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-09
00:34:19 UTC ---
Rebuilding x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0/boehm-gc with -g -O0 -DDARWIN_DEBUG and
the failing gctest at -m64 with the same allows the following backtrace to be
obtained with aslr active und
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-08
23:55:26 UTC ---
FYI, a description of the differences between aslr in Snow Leopard and Lion can
be found at...
http://www.0xcafebabe.it/2011/10/15/on-macos-10-7-dyld-randomization/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
Bug #: 52179
Summary: boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||TREE
Last reconfirmed|2006-12-07 14:17:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #2 from And
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50362
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52035
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
--- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-02-08
21:37:57 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Feb 8 21:37:50 2012
New Revision: 184022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184022
Log:
2012-02-08 Magnus Granberg
PR driver/4852
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Bug #: 52178
Summary: [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-08
21:29:52 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 21:29:45 2012
New Revision: 184020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184020
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-08 21:15:50 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:02:06PM +, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-08
> 21:02:06 UTC ---
> Did this feature already exist in GC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22568
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:59:51 UTC ---
I have a patch to tree-ssa-phiopt.c to fix comment #1 though it needs another
patch to expr.c to produce the cmov directly from COND_EXPR. I hope to post
both patches for 4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52177
Bug #: 52177
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-trivial conversion at
assignment with __atomic_is_lock_free()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46309
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:47:39 UTC ---
Related to PR 19105 and PR 46309
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176
Bug #: 52176
Summary: Valgrind complains about some realloc on assignment to
unallocated LHS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||27403
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27403
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-08
20:16:38 UTC ---
t4.cc:4:17: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template parameter list
for ‘template > struct A’
t4.cc:4:17: error: expected a constant of type ‘int’, got ‘T()’
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2012-02-08
19:53:59 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:53:56 2012
New Revision: 184017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184017
Log:
2012-02-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-08
19:40:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 8 19:40:23 2012
New Revision: 184016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184016
Log:
2012-02-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
19:26:56 UTC ---
Yes, they are not exported in Fedora/RHEL packages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose 2012-02-08
19:24:42 UTC ---
it's not some snapshot, as it looks these were exported consistently since
4.1.1 releases. Do you say that these symbols are not exported for e.g. Fedora
packages?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips*-*-*
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52175
Bug #: 52175
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start after
invalid dbr_schedule transformation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-08 18:10:31 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
> 10:44:51 UTC ---
> Please fill out known-to-work and known-to-fail fields. Was it "working"
Done.
> in any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-08
17:02:16 UTC ---
I saw a similar ICE for the polyhedron test air.f90. The patch in comment #7
fixes the ICE. However it produces a wrong code for -O2 and above, unless I use
-fwhole-program.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-08
16:55:26 UTC ---
but N.B. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1423
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52174
Bug #: 52174
Summary: Implicit conversion of nullptr to bool
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52140
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #12 from Sebastien Bardeau 2012-02-08
16:22:47 UTC ---
Ok, I did not realize that this patch was just a fix candidate.
This bug is not a problem to me, so there is no hurry.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-08 16:15:20 UTC ---
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:38:42AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991
>
> --- Comment #10 from Sebastien Bardeau 2012-02-08
> 10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
16:02:18 UTC ---
Sure, I will check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Jack Lloyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26615|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
--- Comment #1 from Jack Lloyd 2012-02-08 15:52:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 26615
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26615
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
15:52:18 UTC ---
Yeah, that might be a good idea. As it would be just an optimization compared
to the present state, we might in the first step do it just for the ppc targets
that have full float/doub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Bug #: 52173
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed possibly
caused by itm
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Grosser 2012-02-08
15:38:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26614
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26614
A possible fix
Here a possible fix. The commit message is:
Removing old scattering dimensions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-02-08 15:34:32 UTC ---
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> Correct. In fact, I think it's a waste of space to put the soft-float
> functions in the normal ppc32 libgcc. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
15:32:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26613
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26613
gcc47-pr52165.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
15:28:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 15:28:01 2012
New Revision: 184010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184010
Log:
2012-03-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
AssignedTo|spop at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-08
14:42:48 UTC ---
> Trying to update from gcc-4.7.0.20120107 to 4.7.0.20120128
You should try a revision post 183751 that fixed
PR bootstrap/52041
PR bootstrap/52039
PR target/51974
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
14:37:24 UTC ---
For comparison against constants it might be worthwhile to still allow two
loads to improve the number of alignment cases we can handle. Well, I'm not
sure we can expect anything m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2012-02-08
14:35:50 UTC ---
Just "make configure" using FreeBSD ports infrastructure, same as always.
Or do you want to see config.log?
If yes, please let me know which one, and I'll post it.
# find . -nam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||ia64-*-freebsd9.9
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
14:16:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 26612
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26612
alternative patch
Alternative patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52167
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
--- Comment #6 from Clément David 2012-02-08
13:49:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 26611
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26611
Test case
I'm able to reproduce with gcc 4.6.2 with a simple test case.
The attached conftest.cpp c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Bug #: 52172
Summary: [4.7 FreeBSD ia64 regression] stage 3 Bootstrap
comparison failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
13:29:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:29:22 2012
New Revision: 184007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184007
Log:
2012-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
13:27:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:27:31 2012
New Revision: 184006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184006
Log:
PR gcov-profile/52150
* coverage.c: Include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
Bug #: 52171
Summary: memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the result
is tested for [in]equality with 0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08
12:29:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 12:29:43 2012
New Revision: 184005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184005
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52139
* cfgrtl.c (cfg_l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
11:46:35 UTC ---
There are some missed optimizations in simplify-rtx.c, obvious if you look
at uses of const*_rtx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*, x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
11:32:12 UTC ---
#3 0x00adba40 in neg_const_int (mode=V16QImode, i=0x7765c460) at
/work/local-checkouts/gcc-fsf/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:70
#4 0x00ae96bf in simplify_plus_minus (code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52170
Bug #: 52170
Summary: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:57 during
simplify_plus_minus
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52166
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-08
10:58:16 UTC ---
N.B. if we enabled in C++03 mode users would (rightly) complain that
it makes it harder to write portable programs, and it would be a problem for
autoconf-style tests which check fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #3 from Lluís Batlle i Rossell
2012-02-08 10:53:20 UTC ---
It looks also related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8258 . The
post from Tomalak and that made all clear.
Sorry for the noise!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
--- Comment #2 from Tomalak Geret'kal 2012-02-08
10:45:17 UTC ---
Are you sure it's not just that in_avail is 0? Why should it be -1 here?
i.e. doesn't readsome become a noop when there's nothing to read?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Tomalak Geret'kal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at kera dot name
--- Comment #1 f
fortran -v:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/bardeau/Softs/gcc-4.7.0-20120208/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-source/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enabl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-08
10:38:31 UTC ---
It seems that for some weird reason you got two sections for the function
fprintf. Which means that there were two functions fprintf that have not
been merged at WPA stage.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-02-08 10:31:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 26607 [details]
> gcc47-pr52150.patch
>
> Untested fix. I took the liberty to also overwrite the last _ with . or $,
> so that at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52169
Bug #: 52169
Summary: the ifstream readsome() method does not signal any bit
on eof.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo