[Bug target/51835] ARM EABI violation when passing arguments to helper floating functions like __aeabi_d2iz

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 07:42:47 UTC --- Author: amker Date: Tue Feb 14 07:42:41 2012 New Revision: 184197 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184197 Log: Backport from mainline. 2012-01-3

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-02-14 07:27:50 UTC --- Thanks for the reminder Steven. Now submitted.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-14 06:56:10 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't explain clearly from the start. Regarding the backend, I just wanted to double check that for the given insn not having a reservation is correct. Now that Uros c

[Bug c/52181] [4.7 Regression] merge_decls doesn't handle DECL_USER_ALIGN properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-14 06:15:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 14 06:15:35 2012 New Revision: 184193 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184193 Log: PR c/52181 * c-decl.c (merge_decls): Copy D

[Bug target/52055] load of 64-bit pointer reads 64 bits even when only 32 are used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52055 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/31531] A microoptimization of isnegative of signed integer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-14 03:59:12 UTC --- I committed the branch to the git only branch pinskia/treecombine. The only "regression" is gcc.target/i386/umod-3.c. This is not really a regression but rather a testcase issue as

[Bug middle-end/52097] ICE: in get_bit_range, at expr.c:4535 with -O -flto -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions --param allow-store-data-races=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug go/50654] Many Go tests fail on emutls targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52119] [C++11] overflow in signed left shift isn't diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug go/50654] Many Go tests fail on emutls targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50654 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14 00:38:12 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 14 00:38:07 2012 New Revision: 184188 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184188 Log: PR go/50654 runtime: Reload m and g if n

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 23:31:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 13 23:31:48 2012 New Revision: 184181 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184181 Log: PR bootstrap/52172 * cselib.h (cselib_subs

[Bug middle-end/52214] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr44706.C -std=gnu++* scan-tree-dump-not fnsplit "Splitting function"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52214 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-13 23:29:38 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Feb 13 23:29:34 2012 New Revision: 184180 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184180 Log: PR middle-end/52214 * predict.c (predict_p

[Bug target/16350] gcc only understands little endian ARM systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16350 --- Comment #29 from Marc Kleine-Budde 2012-02-13 23:24:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > The precise scope of this bug is unclear to me. It's linux specific. > Big endian Linux targets _do_ seem to work now, and -mbig-endian generates > c

[Bug target/16350] gcc only understands little endian ARM systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16350 --- Comment #28 from Marc Kleine-Budde 2012-02-13 23:23:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > The precise scope of this bug is unclear to me. It's linux specific. > Big endian Linux targets _do_ seem to work now, and -mbig-endian generates > c

[Bug c++/52119] numeric_limits::min() is not a constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 --- Comment #8 from Richard Smith 2012-02-13 22:17:27 UTC --- Signed left shift which overflows the corresponding unsigned type is still undefined, so g++ should reject this: constexpr int n = 2 << 31;

[Bug libgomp/52240] Using -fopenmp compile some No-OpenMP program, running will receive signal SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52240 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/52240] New: Using -fopenmp compile some No-OpenMP program, running will receive signal SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52240 Bug #: 52240 Summary: Using -fopenmp compile some No-OpenMP program, running will receive signal SIGSEGV Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Stat

[Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #31 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-13 21:30:42 UTC --- Author: rth Date: Mon Feb 13 21:30:31 2012 New Revision: 184171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184171 Log: PR libstdc++/51798 continued * include/bits/

[Bug c++/52224] [C++0x] Generic operator gets pulled into compile-time expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52224 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Solodkyy 2012-02-13 21:17:36 UTC --- Was wondering myself if that can be a design issue - here is a related report I did earlier for VC++ 11: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/724557/vs11-compi

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/52207] License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-13 21:05:45 UTC --- hmm, would you mind to provide a patch against current gcc's trunk? Regards, Kai

[Bug tree-optimization/51528] [4.6 Regression] SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2012-02-13 20:40:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > So, I don't see what's wrong on PPC (with SRA, that is). This must be > a target bug if at all (note I'm only inspecting dumps and did not > reproduce the e

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/52172] [4.7 Regression] stage 3 Bootstrap comparison failure on FreeBSD ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 20:26:58 UTC --- Created attachment 26654 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26654 vartrack.ii Slightly reduced testcase. Reproduceable with ./g++ -B ./ -S -fcompare-debug -g -O2 -fno

[Bug c++/52119] numeric_limits::min() is not a constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 20:13:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 13 20:12:54 2012 New Revision: 184167 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184167 Log: PR c++/52215 * c-common.c (sync_resolve_par

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 20:04:12 UTC --- Fixed for trunk, might backport it to 4.[654] eventually, but it isn't high priority, given that it doesn't make any sense to have non-fallthru omp for body, using omp for then isn't r

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 19:57:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 13 19:57:24 2012 New Revision: 184165 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184165 Log: PR middle-end/52230 * omp-low.c (expand_omp

[Bug web/52239] New: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 Bug #: 52239 Summary: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-13 19:15:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > This ought to work. Does applying the fix I discuss in > - setting > FLAGS_TO_PASS = $(AM_MA

[Bug c/52238] New: -mms-bitfields: __attribute__ ((aligned (n))) ignored for struct members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238 Bug #: 52238 Summary: -mms-bitfields: __attribute__ ((aligned (n))) ignored for struct members Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCO

[Bug other/52207] License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 --- Comment #3 from Samuel Bronson 2012-02-13 18:54:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is clearly a matter for the SC. I'd suggest they seek approval from the > FSF to > > (a) put suitable terms directly on gcc-common.texi (maybe GFDL w

[Bug c++/52237] Template specialization and operator overloading causes Segmentation Fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #5 from gee 2012-02-13 18:35:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26653 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26653 proposed patch sorry for pr51500 attachment 26584, it was very bad idea. thiscall trampoline uses call insn so

[Bug tree-optimization/50031] Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC 4.6 on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-02-13 18:25:36 UTC --- Just a quick note about the patch that was committed last week. For 4.6 and 4.7, this approach adjusts the cost model for vector permutes with TARGET_VSX, making them appear more

[Bug c++/52237] New: Template specialization and operator overloading causes Segmentation Fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237 Bug #: 52237 Summary: Template specialization and operator overloading causes Segmentation Fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/52231] [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52231 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 18:19:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > References are just like pointers, just &a is really a and a is really *a. This is wrong in so many ways. Pointers can be null, pointers can be uninitial

[Bug c++/52231] [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52231 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #12 from Xiyue Deng 2012-02-13 18:01:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Could the problem be that you don't have an assembler that supports 64-bit? > > What does return '/usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/x86_64/as -v' (after it you need

[Bug c++/52231] [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52231 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-13 17:56:32 UTC --- Why do you think this is a missed optimization and/or diagnostic? References are just like pointers, just &a is really a and a is really *a.

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51528] [4.6 Regression] SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 fro

[Bug c/52236] segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/48062] `shadowed declaration is here' should be a note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48062 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13 17:25:11 UTC --- There is a patch in PR52116

[Bug c/52116] pragma GCC diagnostic only acts on some lines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13 17:24:31 UTC --- Problem (2) is a duplicate of PR48062

[Bug c/52236] segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 --- Comment #2 from Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn 2012-02-13 17:17:37 UTC --- I opened a ticket on launchpad.net with which to track the progress of this issue across multiple other issue trackers: pycryptopp, GCC, Fedora, and possibly DJB's "nacl" crypto

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 --- Comment #27 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-02-13 17:12:57 UTC --- Vladimir: if you want to report this problem, please open a new bug report. Please do not tag on to this unrelated bug report. Thanks.

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13 17:09:50 UTC --- Any of you has a minimal self-contained testcase? The ones I used when implementing this, no longer need this option. Thanks. This is my totally untested but compiles patch. Pro

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 17:06:44 UTC --- > Yeah. I'm now getting further with Ada LTO bootstrap, but hit an ICE > during optimization: > > /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb: In function > 'sem_prag__analy

[Bug c/52236] segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 --- Comment #1 from Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn 2012-02-13 17:03:49 UTC --- The host is linux x86_64. More information about the platform is queried automatically by the buildbot and archived here: https://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot-pycryptopp/builders/Rub

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c/52236] New: segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236 Bug #: 52236 Summary: segfault in program that results from compiling sha512-hash.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-02-13 16:58:17 UTC --- Created attachment 26651 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26651 Patch to increase regs priority in commutative_operand_precedence

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] New: rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 Bug #: 52235 Summary: rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-02-13 16:50:17 UTC --- This ought to work. Does applying the fix I discuss in - setting FLAGS_TO_PASS = $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) in Makefil

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-02-13 16:24:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Regarding comment 0, how about such a pattern: > > qr/(? Best would be a pattern, which only prohibits "http(s):"[nonwhitespace]/PR". Of course, but nega

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 16:01:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand > > was accessed from attribute calculation machin

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 16:00:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > The bugs you are referring to were real bugs, where wrong or missing operand > was accessed from attribute calculation machinery. ... and PR 49014, where ind

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52203] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7136 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 and other custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52203 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-13 15:54:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, in this case the insn is vcvtps2pd (from avx_cvtps2pd256 and > *avx_cvtps2pd256_2 patterns) but not having a reservation looks correct as the > manual sa

[Bug translation/52234] New: translatable string typo: "argument argument"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52234 Bug #: 52234 Summary: translatable string typo: "argument argument" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 --- Comment #4 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-02-13 15:49:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you explain what you mean by stuck? Also all those flags look like you > are > trying to test out the compiler and not really the system. > > P

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:44:21 UTC --- as shown at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2012-02/msg01317.html

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:40:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > My regexp explicitly forbirds / right before PR but I cannot remember > > why > > maybe so it doesn't catch external lin

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-13 15:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > My regexp explicitly forbirds / right before PR but I cannot remember why maybe so it doesn't catch external links like http://sourceware.org/PR123 ?

[Bug c/52190] question about atomic intrinsics -- test and documentation vary -- please clarify

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52190 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-13 15:37:38 UTC --- Author: amacleod Date: Mon Feb 13 15:37:33 2012 New Revision: 184156 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184156 Log: 2012-02-13 Andrew MacLeod PR c/52190

[Bug target/52225] -minline-all-stringops possible stuck

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52225 --- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-02-13 15:35:08 UTC --- OK, I will try to reproduce problem on chrooted environment (I rebuild system on this machine).

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/52228] Bugzilla: Missing link for "PR...."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52228 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-13 15:27:04 UTC --- I think that is better.. its is just the I{1,2,4,8,16} we care about.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-13 15:18:19 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Mon Feb 13 15:18:14 2012 New Revision: 184155 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184155 Log: PR libffi/52221 * src/x86/ffi.c (ffi_p

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 14:43:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > > Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p > > wrongly checks > > > > if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_

[Bug c++/52233] New: ICE segmentation fault with non-recursive templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52233 Bug #: 52233 Summary: ICE segmentation fault with non-recursive templates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 14:21:57 UTC --- > Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p > wrongly checks > > if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE) > RETURN_TRUE_IF_

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:18:58 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug translation/52232] New: translatable string typos: "conindexed" (should be "coindexed")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52232 Bug #: 52232 Summary: translatable string typos: "conindexed" (should be "coindexed") Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:13:39 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > > > -

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/52223] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] libffi's man page install breaks with multilibs and overridden mandir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:03:27 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 > 13:55:4

[Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:55:47 UTC --- > Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification? No, it shouldn't. > Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA > and L

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:54:31 UTC --- > Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says > if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from > before gimple/SSA times. Yes

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 13:53:01 UTC --- > Still they are refered to globally. I'm refering to > atree__atree_private_part__node_record___is_extension___XVN > (it doesn't have any TYPE_CONTEXT though, and its TYPE_SIZE is a

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:44:44 UTC --- Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification? Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA and LTRANS stage)?

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:42:49 UTC --- Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from before gimple/SSA times.

[Bug c++/52231] New: [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52231 Bug #: 52231 Summary: [missed optimization/diagnostics] address-of-reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13 13:29:38 UTC --- Ok, the issue is that we end up with using a type streamed into the function sections - those are assumed to not need participating in merging and thus we never merge them, even can

[Bug bootstrap/52226] Trunk fails to bootstrap on Mac OS X.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52226 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-02-13 13:09:26 UTC --- > Could the problem be that you don't have an assembler that supports 64-bit? What does return '/usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/x86_64/as -v' (after it you need to interupt as with ct

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 12:39:06 UTC --- > I see. I came up with the following, but it's unlikely to make a > difference either Thanks, I'll give it a try. While Ada doesn't use METHOD_TYPE, it extensively uses type attrib

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 12:29:36 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 > 12:17:46

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 12:17:46 UTC --- > Sth I'm not very familiar is the QUAL_UNION record kinds - maybe you > can eye the two merging machineries for obvious errors here? I did, and only came up with the following no-op

[Bug middle-end/52230] OpenMP: Simple C program triggers SIGSEGV at execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52230 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-13 12:05:12 UTC --- Created attachment 26649 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26649 gcc47-pr52230.patch Untested fix.

  1   2   >