http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52338
Bug #: 52338
Summary: shorter abs thumb2 code sequences
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-22
09:07:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> if( _find_port( g_pstv->member.pstid, index,
> (void*)&pstid)
This bit looks like a strict-aliasing violation waiting to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52331
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-22 09:12:15
UTC ---
*** Bug 52331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #12 from Gregory Maxwell 2012-02-22
09:19:54 UTC ---
_Not_ failing in r184458. Perhaps fixed by r184265?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
--- Comment #21 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-22
09:25:48 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 22 09:25:35 2012
New Revision: 184461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184461
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/50063
* config/avr/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52334
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22
09:35:44 UTC ---
(do you have something against whitespace?!)
could you explain exactly what you think GCC does wrong, and what you expect to
happen?
I'm afraid I don't understand your report.
Her
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22
09:38:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> m[3]=(pgabstract*)&ai;
> m[3]->get();
This is undefined behaviour, ai is not of type pgabstract
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #13 from Gregory Maxwell 2012-02-22
09:39:51 UTC ---
Okay, it doesn't ICE now— but now I have cases where it apparently runs forever
and cases where it produces incorrect code with -floop-flatten.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-22
09:57:22 UTC ---
I'm not sure we care about preserving pointer types in debug stmts, nor if
the mem-ref stripping is needed (well, build_fold_addr_expr does that, too).
Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52297
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-22
10:11:11 UTC ---
Testcase:
void foo (int * __restrict a, int * __restrict b, int * __restrict c,
unsigned n)
{
unsigned i;
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
a[i] = b[i] + c[i];
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-22 10:16:01 UTC ---
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52019
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-22 10:19:27
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 22 10:19:22 2012
New Revision: 184462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184462
Log:
PR lto/50616
* lto-plugin.c (PRI_LL):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
--- Comment #4 from xiaoyuanbo 2012-02-22 10:28:53
UTC ---
i sure you know it is type abstract not inheritance but if address exist not
system fault display you know it is sql hackg++ sql hack title.
root hack
obtain privilage
display hack movie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339
Bug #: 52339
Summary: using delete ptr1->ptr2 where ptr2 destructor deletes
a const ptr1 fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor 2012-02-22
10:37:11 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Feb 22 10:37:03 2012
New Revision: 184463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184463
Log:
2012-02-22 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-22
11:21:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 22 11:21:48 2012
New Revision: 184466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184466
Log:
2012-02-22 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22
11:22:14 UTC ---
C++ is not memory safe, but I guess you know that (and that code probably
shouldn't be run outside a VM)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52329
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52338
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52338
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52337
--- Comment #7 from xiaoyuanbo 2012-02-22 12:24:54
UTC ---
i tell you of cause context certainly
vm is your keyword
outside you consider
but regular pascal refer the abiblity
you can surppose a memory like gcc use
or g++ it is that selector
so yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30640
--- Comment #1 from xiaoyuanbo 2012-02-22 12:27:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> in function lang_specific_driver, if shared gcclib is wanted, a new larger
> memory block is allocated for the extra argument "-shared-libgcc". However,
> the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27031
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #16 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2012-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43988
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33451
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21046
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36370
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #46 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52339
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22
12:48:04 UTC ---
b = b.0;
a = b->a;
D.2361 = a->b;
if (D.2361 != 0B) goto ; else goto ;
:
D.2364 = a->b;
B::~B (D.2364);
D.2365 = a->b;
operator delete (D.2365);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #10 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51175
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44490
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28233
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #9 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39222
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #9 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17306
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #12 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45937
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42587
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #16 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47754
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12083
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27541
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16997
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #7 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35372
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
xiaoyuanbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiaoyuanbo at yeah dot net
--- Comment #12 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564
--- Comment #2 from Martin Ettl 2012-02-22 14:16:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> so leack memory that it is disk
Sorry, but what does this comment mean?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-22
14:14:03 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 22 14:13:48 2012
New Revision: 184481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184481
Log:
PR target/18145
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49564
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-22
14:20:29 UTC ---
I think you can ignore it, that user has been posting comments on dozens of
bugs that refer to the word "memory" anywhere in the title or comments:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52340
Bug #: 52340
Summary: autopar (at least) corrupts dominance info
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52223
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52137
Quentin Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52321
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52335
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-22
17:25:21 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 22 17:25:11 2012
New Revision: 184485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184485
Log:
2012-02-22 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52341
Bug #: 52341
Summary: crypto/rand FAILs before Solaris 11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52342
Bug #: 52342
Summary: 64-bit go.test/test/chan/doubleselect.go times out on
Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
--- Comment #14 from gee 2012-02-22 18:13:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Yes, this looks better IMHO. Btw any differences about libjava testsuite run
> about this altered libffi patch?
WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file.
Test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
Bug #: 52343
Summary: [C++11] alias-definition dont work in
`template` params type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
--- Comment #3 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-02-22
18:49:15 UTC ---
I'll take a look on Friday, tomorrow I am off work. Indeed I do not remember
seeing these notes at the assert time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:12:14 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 22 19:12:09 2012
New Revision: 184488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184488
Log:
PR target/52330
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52330
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 19:17:47 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Feb 22 19:17:42 2012
New Revision: 184489
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184489
Log:
PR target/52330
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin 2012-02-22
19:25:45 UTC ---
Bugzilla 4.2 has been released today. But overseers told me that bzr (Bazaar)
cannot be installed on the server because it has a too old version of Python.
As Bugzilla 4.0.x is the l
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo