http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53255
Bug #: 53255
Summary: [OOP] With TYPE, wrong type-bound operator used: of
parent instead of overridden one
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53255
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
--- Comment #2 from Alessandro Fanfarillo
2012-05-06 10:32:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27323
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27323
Patch for 52158 and 45170#19
Patch realized on gcc version 4.8.0 20120505
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
Alessandro Fanfarillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fanfarillo.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-06 10:55:48 UTC ---
Gah. Sorry for the breakage.
This is caused by the x86_64 TLS code generating a DImode
MEM address when Pmode == SImode. As you say here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219
--- Comment #7 from Martin Husemann 2012-05-06
10:59:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 27324
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27324
gcc -S output for the miscompiled function
The original report showed the disassembler output from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-05-06 11:21:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Daniel, can you see other options besides adding a specialization? (which
> would
> be a straightforward task, I may even get around to do pretty soon when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
Bug #: 53256
Summary: [avr] Attribute 'interrupt' shall override attribute
'signal'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39044
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294
junkmailnotread at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||junkmailnotread at yahoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53257
Bug #: 53257
Summary: GCC wiki takes a very, very long time to save a page
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Glaser 2012-05-06 14:16:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 27325
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27325
preprocessed source of libxslt occurrence
The same thing happens in libxslt-1.1.26 but even with P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-06 14:28:55
UTC ---
A small testcase:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr53249]$ cat x.i
struct gomp_task
{
struct gomp_task *parent;
};
struct gomp_thread
{
int foo1;
struct gomp_task *task;
};
extern __thread struct gomp_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-06 14:35:26
UTC ---
X32 is a 32bit environment for x86-64:
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
Since there is no x32 mode in hardware, x32 binaries
run in pure 64-bit mode.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-06 14:54:10
UTC ---
Can you just use GET_MODE (mem) instead of
targetm.addr_space.address_mode (MEM_ADDR_SPACE (mem))
when you change plus_constant (mem, offset)?
At least, you should allow a backend to do
plu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53152
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-06 15:06:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun May 6 15:06:31 2012
New Revision: 187211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187211
Log:
2012-05-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53152
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-06
15:39:33 UTC ---
Thanks Daniel. Since we had this issue for so much time, I guess we could as
well wait a bit for the Committee to provide some feedback about the
specialization option: in case there a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 15:56:09 UTC ---
"hjl.tools at gmail dot com" writes:
> get_address_mode in dwarf2out.c works for this testcase.
Yeah, that's what I was testing FWIW. If x32 wants to do this,
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-06 16:00:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" writes:
> > get_address_mode in dwarf2out.c works for this testcase.
>
> Yeah, that's what I was testing FWIW. If x32 wants to do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Glas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53258
Bug #: 53258
Summary: Many symbols cannot lookup when loading plugin in
configured with --enable-build-with-cxx.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-05-06 17:34:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Here is a simplified code -> "gcc_error_simple.cpp"
> Shows two facets of the error.
>
> See the comments in the attached file.
Fixed and simplified that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||overseers at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53258
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06
17:55:52 UTC ---
This is expected until GCC has a real stable API for plugins. There was a
thread earlier this year exactly about this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 18:04:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 27326
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27326
Proposed patch
(In reply to comment #0)
> On sh4-unknown-linux-gnu, there are many new failures after re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53227
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53227
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
Component|rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900
--- Comment #5 from gccBugs at haatschii dot de 2012-05-06 18:34:41 UTC ---
Could you reproduce the bug? Or do you need any more informations?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler
2012-05-06 18:56:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> By the way - I think we discussed this already, bu now I can't find anything -
> what should we take the begin() == end() == unique value exactly to mean?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #19 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 19:17:03 UTC ---
"olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06
> 18:09:37 UTC ---
> On SH an issue popped up because lower-subreg would not sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53259
Bug #: 53259
Summary: [OOP] virtual call to type bound procedure calls base,
not extension?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06
19:21:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> > --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06
> > 18:09:37 UTC ---
> > On SH an issue popped up because lower-subreg w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53260
Bug #: 53260
Summary: cse doesn't record REG_EQUAL notes for function
invariants
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-06
19:27:56 UTC ---
Good, good then. Personally, I find that "unique value" confusing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-06
20:30:13 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 6 20:30:05 2012
New Revision: 187214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187214
Log:
2012-05-06 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53227
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-06 20:48:03 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun May 6 20:47:59 2012
New Revision: 187215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187215
Log:
PR target/53227
* config/i386/i386.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin 2012-05-06
20:50:13 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun May 6 20:50:06 2012
New Revision: 187216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187216
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2012-04-27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2012-05-06
20:59:14 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun May 6 20:59:10 2012
New Revision: 187217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187217
Log:
PR target/52999
* config/pa/pa.h (LE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53227
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53259
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-06
21:40:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27328
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27328
Remove unused sched_branch_type stuff from m68k
Patch speaks for itself.
Without patch, trunk r1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
Bug #: 53261
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_nop_conversions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-05-06 22:39:01
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun May 6 22:38:57 2012
New Revision: 187218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187218
Log:
PR target/53250
* config/sh/sh.c (sh_rtx_cos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06
23:25:40 UTC ---
All this should be taken care of by the default rtx costs; I don't think any
target patches should be needed for these targets at least not for this case.
The default should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #22 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-06
23:28:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Hopefully it was obvious, but:
> ... where natural_set_cost is the cost of
> setting a register (possibly the default)
... for the UNITS_PER_WORD cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53239
--- Comment #6 from proski at gnu dot org 2012-05-07 02:50:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 27330
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27330
Self-contained test case
Run the "compile" script. The output would be:
return = 2/1
return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
60 matches
Mail list logo
