http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-solaris2*, |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53335
Bug #: 53335
Summary: [4.6,4.7,4.8] pragma visibility(hidden) propagates
beyond pop
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48009
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13 08:59:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(If anyone can point me to a fixinclude that does the same
kind of one-line change elsewhere, I could work with that...)
That's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13 09:06:42
UTC ---
With boost 1.49, g++-4.7 compiles the code just fine, while g++-4.6 gives:
u.cc: In function ‘void bug() [with template-parameter-1-1 = void]’:
u.cc:14:24:
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
Created attachment 27392
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27392
gzipped C++ source code
I just tried to compile the package boost-1.48.0-13
on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
10:52:37 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 13 10:52:32 2012
New Revision: 187436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187436
Log:
2012-05-13 Alessandro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #32 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
10:52:37 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 13 10:52:32 2012
New Revision: 187436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187436
Log:
2012-05-13 Alessandro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
10:52:38 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 13 10:52:32 2012
New Revision: 187436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187436
Log:
2012-05-13 Alessandro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-05-13
11:38:44 UTC ---
This is due to revision 187402: r187401 bootstrapped without any problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #33 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
12:45:46 UTC ---
STATUS: Many issues have been fixed, but several still exist.
- See list of bugs which depend on/block this PR.
Regarding the bugs reported/mentioned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53335
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
--- Comment #4 from ralphengels at gmail dot com ralphengels at gmail dot com
2012-05-13 15:15:10 UTC ---
Adding
--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx \
--disable-build-with-cxx \
allows the full bootstrap on windows with mingw64.
Something is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #136 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
16:29:04 UTC ---
... and oprofile of compilation stage of -flto-partition=none
samples %image name app name symbol name
194976
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337
Bug #: 53337
Summary: [4.7.1 lto] produces warning: relocation refers to
discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
Bug #: 53338
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Unaligned store generated for aligned
data
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-13 19:26:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Following testcase:
--cut here--
#define SIZE 10240
int b[SIZE], c[SIZE];
long long __attribute__((__aligned__ (128))) a[SIZE];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41103
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
Bug #: 53339
Summary: unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete
type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #1 from Eugene Toder eltoder at gmail dot com 2012-05-13 22:22:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 27394
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27394
Quick and dirty proof-of-concept patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13
22:30:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 53072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40278
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50606
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53319
--- Comment #6 from bje at air dot net.au 2012-05-13 22:48:18 UTC ---
Thanks, I'll take a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44516
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53235
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #3 from Eugene Toder eltoder at gmail dot com 2012-05-14 02:40:03
UTC ---
Can you point me to where libstdc++ mainline lives these days? trunk and a
couple other branches I've checked don't have that line in hashtable_policy.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48009
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2012-05-14
03:19:36 UTC ---
Marc, thank you for the pointer. The single-line-edit case, at least, seems
straightforward enough.
Here's my stab at it:
/*
* stdlib.h on AIX 4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #4 from Eugene Toder eltoder at gmail dot com 2012-05-14 04:41:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 27395
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27395
POC for mainline
Never mind, I was looking in tr1 instead of bits.
Yes, it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339
--- Comment #5 from Eugene Toder eltoder at gmail dot com 2012-05-14 05:05:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 27396
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27396
Another approach
Actually, a much simpler and cleaner change might be along
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
38 matches
Mail list logo
