[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-15 04:25:40 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue May 15 04:25:25 2012 New Revision: 187497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187497 Log: PR c++/53209 * pt.c (tsubst_decl): Bail out if

[Bug c++/53356] New: ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4258

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53356 Bug #: 53356 Summary: ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4258 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 Eugene Toder changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27395|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 --- Comment #6 from amker.cheng 2012-05-15 02:15:59 UTC --- No regression reported in trunk so far, I back ported it into 4.7 branch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-15 02:14:11 UTC --- Author: amker Date: Tue May 15 02:14:05 2012 New Revision: 187496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187496 Log: Backport r187139 from mainline. 20

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #4 from Steven Fuerst 2012-05-15 02:09:05 UTC --- Actually, it is the rax:rdx pair that is most likely. ax:dx only has 32 bits. rax:rdx is specified by the 'A' constraint, the only gpr option that is 128 bits. (Yes, it would be nic

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #11 from Eugene Toder 2012-05-15 02:03:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27407 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27407 Another simple test case

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-15 02:02:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Obviously a __int128_t fits in two registers. The bug is that gcc doesn't > warn/error about code mistakenly trying to fit it into one. Instead, gcc > gene

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 --- Comment #2 from Steven Fuerst 2012-05-15 01:54:46 UTC --- Obviously a __int128_t fits in two registers. The bug is that gcc doesn't warn/error about code mistakenly trying to fit it into one. Instead, gcc generates a weird 16-bit operation,

[Bug c/53355] New: Autovectorization of a simple loop could be improved.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53355 Bug #: 53355 Summary: Autovectorization of a simple loop could be improved. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/53350] Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-15 01:47:08 UTC --- Please reduce it (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction), and, as an extrema ratio, attach it compressed. Thanks.

[Bug target/53354] %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53354 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c/53353] Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53354] New: %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53354 Bug #: 53354 Summary: %z# asm specifier could be extended to support immediate constraints Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/53350] Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Thompson 2012-05-15 01:12:30 UTC --- The attachment was too large. I've put it here instead: http://mneme.dyndns.org/~ryan/cc0UmSiB.out

[Bug bootstrap/53351] Missing integer types when bootstrapping on AIX 4.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53351 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27402|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/53353] New: Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 Bug #: 53353 Summary: Missing error/warning when using __int128_t with incorrect asm register constraints Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug c++/53350] Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/53348] Conflicting fast-integer types on AIX: vs. gcc/config/rs6000/aix-stdint.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-14 22:54:02 UTC --- *** Bug 47902 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/47902] Bootstrap failure: libiberty/regex.c: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47902 Daniel Richard G. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53352] Incorrect CSE optimization on RTL expressions with a paradoxical subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352 --- Comment #1 from Meador Inge 2012-05-14 22:52:41 UTC --- Created attachment 27405 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27405 Reproduction case

[Bug bootstrap/47907] Bootstrap failure: libiberty/hashtab.c: error: conflicting types for 'int_fast16_t'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47907 Daniel Richard G. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53348] Conflicting fast-integer types on AIX: vs. gcc/config/rs6000/aix-stdint.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-14 22:51:36 UTC --- *** Bug 47907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/53352] New: Incorrect CSE optimization on RTL expressions with a paradoxical subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352 Bug #: 53352 Summary: Incorrect CSE optimization on RTL expressions with a paradoxical subreg Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug bootstrap/53351] New: Missing integer types when bootstrapping on AIX 4.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53351 Bug #: 53351 Summary: Missing integer types when bootstrapping on AIX 4.3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53350] New: Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53350 Bug #: 53350 Summary: Internal compiler error when compiling boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp 1.49 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: U

[Bug c++/53349] New: Internal compiler error with constexpr and recursive data type.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53349 Bug #: 53349 Summary: Internal compiler error with constexpr and recursive data type. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14 21:35:20 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon May 14 21:35:16 2012 New Revision: 187484 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187484 Log: PR target/46098 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14 21:32:35 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon May 14 21:32:29 2012 New Revision: 187483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187483 Log: PR target/46098 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14 21:30:27 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon May 14 21:30:23 2012 New Revision: 187482 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187482 Log: PR target/46098 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14 21:28:11 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon May 14 21:28:07 2012 New Revision: 187481 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187481 Log: PR target/46098 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #30 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-14 20:19:39 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Mon May 14 20:19:30 2012 New Revision: 187479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187479 Log: 2012-05-14 Marc Glisse PR target/52607

[Bug libstdc++/53263] priority_queue is very slow if -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53263 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of "-huge()-1": Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of "-huge()-1": Integer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-05-14 19:39:27 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Mon May 14 19:39:23 2012 New Revision: 187478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187478 Log: PR 52428 Range checking when reading integer values.

[Bug c/50606] gcc fails to detect obvious use of NULL pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50606 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-14 18:47:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > printf warnings are handled in the FE, so we would need > > constant-propagation in > > the FE. Clang implements it, so I

[Bug target/53315] simple xtest program generates ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-14 18:47:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 14 18:47:05 2012 New Revision: 187477 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187477 Log: 2012-05-14 Andrew Pinski H.J. Lu

[Bug c/50606] gcc fails to detect obvious use of NULL pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50606 --- Comment #2 from dcb 2012-05-14 18:24:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > printf warnings are handled in the FE, so we would need constant-propagation > in > the FE. Clang implements it, so I know it is possible. I think my bug report wasn

[Bug target/46098] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2100 with -msse3 -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_loadupd()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46098 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug other/53317] Conversion from __int128 to __float128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53317 --- Comment #3 from ahakkas at gmail dot com 2012-05-14 18:07:50 UTC --- Created attachment 27403 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27403 testcase

[Bug bootstrap/53348] New: Conflicting fast-integer types on AIX: vs. gcc/config/rs6000/aix-stdint.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53348 Bug #: 53348 Summary: Conflicting fast-integer types on AIX: vs. gcc/config/rs6000/aix-stdint.h Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/53334] [4.8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2131

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Miles

[Bug fortran/51055] deferred length character allocation: allocate(character(len=i)::s) rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53329] ICE with deferred-length module variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53329 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-14 16:45:31 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 14 16:45:16 2012 New Revision: 187472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187472 Log: 2012-05-14 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51055] deferred length character allocation: allocate(character(len=i)::s) rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-14 16:45:31 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 14 16:45:16 2012 New Revision: 187472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187472 Log: 2012-05-14 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/49

[Bug fortran/53329] ICE with deferred-length module variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53329 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-14 16:45:32 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon May 14 16:45:16 2012 New Revision: 187472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187472 Log: 2012-05-14 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/49

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.thompson at lboro dot

[Bug fortran/51394] Rejects legal code involving an allocatable string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51394 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-14 16:42:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Like, sorry about my naivete, by adding a cp_parser_skip_to_end_of_statement > or > something right after the error message?!? That may work and the

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-14 16:07:32 UTC --- I agree it should be better, but the analogy isn't great: "new foo" requires foo to be a type, "delete foo" requires foo to be a variable.

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53344] Dont' emit an assembler warning when assembling 3-byte symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53344 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53344] Dont' emit an assembler warning when assembling 3-byte symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53344 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-14 15:48:15 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon May 14 15:47:52 2012 New Revision: 187470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187470 Log: PR target/53344 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_co

[Bug middle-end/53347] New: Duplicated redundant condition in compare-elim.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53347 Bug #: 53347 Summary: Duplicated redundant condition in compare-elim.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug tree-optimization/53346] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad vectorization in the proc cptrf2 of rnflow.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53346 Bug #: 53346 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad vectorization in the proc cptrf2 of rnflow.f90 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNC

[Bug bootstrap/53331] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure in tree-vect-data-ref compiling matmul_i4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53331] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure in tree-vect-data-ref compiling matmul_i4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-14 15:01:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 14 15:01:22 2012 New Revision: 187466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187466 Log: 2012-05-14 Richard Guenther PR tree-o

[Bug objc/53345] some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53345 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-14 15:00:32 UTC --- A relatively simple fix is a new option OPT_Wformat_pedantic that is enabled by default. Another option is to enable Wformat by default. That doesn't sound too bad.

[Bug objc/53345] some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53345 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot

[Bug objc/53345] New: some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53345 Bug #: 53345 Summary: some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug ada/52494] s-taprop-dummy.adb does not define subpackage Specific used in s-tpoaal.sdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52494 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-05-14 14:08:04 UTC --- I will try the trunk go binutils. Still I confirm that this warning does not appear at all (in real-life code, not just in the attached test case) with gcc 4.8

[Bug target/53344] Dont' emit an assembler warning when assembling 3-byte symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53344 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Blocks|

[Bug target/53344] New: Dont' emit an assembler warning when assembling 3-byte symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53344 Bug #: 53344 Summary: Dont' emit an assembler warning when assembling 3-byte symbols Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/53331] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure in tree-vect-data-ref compiling matmul_i4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Richard G

[Bug bootstrap/53331] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure in tree-vect-data-ref compiling matmul_i4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64-*-* |powerpc64-*-*, |

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-14 13:30:39 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Mon May 14 13:30:32 2012 New Revision: 187462 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187462 Log: 2012-05-14 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR 5306

[Bug lto/53337] 4.7.1 lto produces warning: relocation refers to discarded section in linker (gold, binutil 2.22)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53337 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-14 13:12:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27402 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27402 Draft Something like this, very lightly tested so far.

[Bug preprocessor/53229] macro unwinder for preprocessing errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53229 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856 --- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-14 12:56:09 UTC --- Seems like another job for c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings.

[Bug bootstrap/53343] New: [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' broke bootstrap on sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343 Bug #: 53343 Summary: [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' broke bootstrap on sparc64-linux Classification: Unclassified

[Bug bootstrap/53331] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure in tree-vect-data-ref compiling matmul_i4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53331 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-05-14 12:32:26 UTC --- > Can you try >From a clean bootstrap at revision 187401, updating gcc and rebuilding libgfortran has succeeded for 187402 with the patch in comment #6 (with libgfortran moved

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |matz at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] New: [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 Bug #: 53342 Summary: [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53241] Bad pre increment insn for ARM vfp store instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53241 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53340] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~20% slower after revision 187092

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53340 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53340] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~20% slower after revision 187092

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53340 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-14 11:37:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 14 11:36:58 2012 New Revision: 187457 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187457 Log: 2012-05-14 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug ada/52494] s-taprop-dummy.adb does not define subpackage Specific used in s-tpoaal.sdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52494 --- Comment #2 from Andris Pavenis 2012-05-14 11:30:49 UTC --- Created attachment 27400 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27400 Add missing sub-package to s-taprop-dummy.adb

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/39681] Compile error is not descriptive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39681 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target|i486-

[Bug ada/52362] gnat.dg/lto8.adb FAILs with gas/gld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-14 11:22:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > When there are many files to link, gnatlink passes a file containing the file > names, instead of the file names directly, on the GCC link line. There is

[Bug middle-end/37864] warning from fold looks at macro expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37864 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/52362] gnat.dg/lto8.adb FAILs with gas/gld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52362 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-14 11:14:28 UTC --- When there are many files to link, gnatlink passes a file containing the file names, instead of the file names directly, on the GCC link line. There is a bad interaction with LTO: er

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-14 10:59:15 UTC --- I really do believe that we want to leave the stuff in stl_function.h alone and have something very neat in namespace __detail, in hashtable_policy.h, probably a single overloaded temp

[Bug tree-optimization/53336] [4.8 Regression] invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53336 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/53336] [4.8 Regression] invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53336 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53339] unordered_map::iterator requires Value to be complete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53339 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-14 10:52:28 UTC --- Can we avoid deriving from unary_function and binary_function, no big deal as an implementation detail, but are deprecated in C++11, I would rather *remove* uses. Also, did you run the

[Bug tree-optimization/53340] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~20% slower after revision 187092

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53340 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53341] New: overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object file even when not directly used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53341 Bug #: 53341 Summary: overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object file even when not directly used Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

  1   2   >