[Bug bootstrap/53468] New: bootstrap fails on debian/amd64, unable to find crti.o and crtn.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53468 Bug #: 53468 Summary: bootstrap fails on debian/amd64, unable to find crti.o and crtn.o Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-24 07:29:52 UTC --- On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/53466] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/53467] xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc-linux

[Bug bootstrap/53468] bootstrap fails on debian/amd64, unable to find crti.o and crtn.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53468 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 07:38:11 UTC --- Well, it's hardly our fault that Debian breaks the only implemented scheme. ISTR various workarounds floating around, try googling.

[Bug middle-end/53460] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 07:42:26 UTC --- Dropping all might pessimize some code (of course, this is VR_UNDEFINED, so the question is if we need to care that much about broken code), like: int foo (int

[Bug middle-end/53303] Reload/RA issue on word-sized paradoxical subregs for big-endian targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53303 --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Buhrig aurelien.buhrig.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-05-24 07:43:39 UTC --- This bug is very annoying for me. I can't really work around it. Let me know if there is something I can do to help fixing it... Cheers,

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-24 07:57:58 UTC --- On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub

[Bug bootstrap/53468] debian/ubuntu changed the location of libraries on the disk which broke bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53468 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bootstrap fails on |debian/ubuntu

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/53460] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 09:28:07 UTC --- Created attachment 27486 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27486 autoreduced testcase

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3

[Bug c++/53469] New: #pragma GCC diagnostic works, but using _Pragma doesn't for -Wunused-local-typedefs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 Bug #: 53469 Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic works, but using _Pragma doesn't for -Wunused-local-typedefs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/32080] Can goto a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/53470] New: [4.8 LTO] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status happens in many other contexts, always at dwarf2out.c:4264 cc version 4.8.0 20120524 (experimental) [trunk revision 187822] (GCC) GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.22.52.20120515) 1.11

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 09:43:13 UTC --- More reduced: templatetypename T class OwnPtr { public: ~OwnPtr(); }; templateclass T class GlyphMetricsMap { public: GlyphMetricsMap() { }

[Bug lto/53470] [4.8 LTO] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 09:47:24 UTC --- That can unfortunately happen (I thought we ironed out most of these bugs, but obviously testing coverage for this case isn't as good).

[Bug bootstrap/53466] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 09:54:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 24 09:54:25 2012 New Revision: 187824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187824 Log: 2012-05-24 Richard

[Bug bootstrap/53466] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/53471] New: [4.8 LTO] ICE in pp_base_format, at pretty-print.c:510 (-flto -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471 Bug #: 53471 Summary: [4.8 LTO] ICE in pp_base_format, at pretty-print.c:510 (-flto -g) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 10:50:42 UTC --- We have an unreachable block: # BLOCK 4 # PRED: L0: operator delete (D.2260_4); # SUCC: 5 [100.0%] (fallthru) after profiling. Somehow we

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 11:39:10 UTC --- Later today I will add it.

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 11:51:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 24 11:51:09 2012 New Revision: 187827 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187827 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 11:53:33 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 24 11:53:29 2012 New Revision: 187828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187828 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/39679] Some absent attributes in the tree-dump should be added

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|susanin at ispras dot ru

[Bug c++/42129] ICE in pointer difference with sizeof(int)sizeof(void *)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 12:04:17 UTC --- Pinging Nathan, maybe we can do this for 4.8...

[Bug c++/51222] [C++11][SFINAE] Unevaluated combined delete new expression completely broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/24375] Wrong line number in diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |

[Bug bootstrap/53466] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 12:36:47 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 24 12:36:40 2012 New Revision: 187830 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187830 Log: 2012-05-24 Richard

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 12:46:57 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 24 12:46:53 2012 New Revision: 187831 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187831 Log: 2012-05-24 Richard

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 12:50:21 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu May 24 12:50:15 2012 New Revision: 187832 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187832 Log: 2012-05-24 Richard

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53460] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/49954] ICE assigning concat expression to an array deferred-length string (realloc on assignment)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49954 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug preprocessor/53463] [4.8 Regression]: system header not recognized, yielding warnings about long long preprocessor constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463 Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Greta.Yorsh at

[Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 --- Comment #37 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 13:08:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) REMAINING issues: - comment 24 first Does not work., see also comment 34 One has in gfc_trans_assignment_1: string_length =

[Bug bootstrap/53472] New: contrib/compare-debug should strip out .comment section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53472 Bug #: 53472 Summary: contrib/compare-debug should strip out .comment section Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53473] New: [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 Bug #: 53473 Summary: [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53474] New: [4.8 regression] Solaris/x86 bootstrap with Sun as broken: j.e

-solaris2.11 As of 20120524, Solaris/x86 bootstrap with Sun as is broken configuring the stage1 libgcc: configure:4192: checking whether to use setjmp/longjmp exceptions configure:: /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/ -B/vol/gcc/i386-pc

[Bug target/53474] [4.8 regression] Solaris/x86 bootstrap with Sun as broken: j.e

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53474 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-05-24 13:53:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) gcc hasn't changed the emitted DWARF in this case for more than 12 years. Actually Apple gcc-4.2.1 doesn't seem to emit

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] Error: operand out of range after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012 New Revision: 187834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187834 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] Error: operand out of range after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012 New Revision: 187834 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187834 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill

[Bug target/53385] [4.8 Regression] Error: operand out of range after changes for LSHIFT_EXPR in vrp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385 --- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 13:54:24 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu May 24 13:54:16 2012 New Revision: 187835 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187835 Log: 2012-05-24 Bill

[Bug c++/20624] [4.0 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20624 online games peter78 at hotmail dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/53474] [4.8 regression] Solaris/x86 bootstrap with Sun as broken: j.e

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53474 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/5911] Support for multilib in Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911 online games peter78 at hotmail dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter78

[Bug bootstrap/53472] contrib/compare-debug should strip out .comment section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53472 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 Neal Becker ndbecker2 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndbecker2 at

[Bug libstdc++/53475] New: Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 Bug #: 53475 Summary: Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/53476] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476 Bug #: 53476 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #7 from Jonas Wielicki org.gnu.gcc.bugtracker at sotecware dot net 2012-05-24 14:32:37 UTC --- Interestingly, I am using no_init too, but without supplying an alternative constructor. I am not at the testing machine right now, but I

[Bug libstdc++/53475] Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 14:41:59 UTC --- Please try to narrow the commit which is causing the problem a bit more: to be really honest, it's the first time in my life I see this kind of error

[Bug c++/32080] Can goto a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 14:47:12 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu May 24 14:47:06 2012 New Revision: 187837 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187837 Log: /cp 2012-05-24

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #8 from Jonas Wielicki org.gnu.gcc.bugtracker at sotecware dot net 2012-05-24 14:48:23 UTC --- I was able to use the VM sooner than expected, so sorry for the doublepost. I found that whether using no_init or init() does not make a

[Bug c++/32080] Can goto a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53464] Invalid default value for non-type template parameter is accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 15:12:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu May 24 15:12:37 2012 New Revision: 187842 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187842 Log: 2012-05-24 Paolo

[Bug c++/53412] Error recovery for class types is poor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53412 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/25751] Poor error when templating on undefined types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25751 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at

[Bug c++/25751] Poor error when templating on undefined types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25751 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 15:29:42 UTC --- Manuel, what happened to this, out of curiosity? I see an Assigned status (but the Assigned To field still blank) and a documentation patchlet of yours

[Bug middle-end/53476] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug c++/50477] -Wunused-parameter should not warn about virtual method declarations with bodies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug libstdc++/53477] New: pretty printer fails with: Python Exception type 'exceptions.IndexError' list index out of range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 Bug #: 53477 Summary: pretty printer fails with: Python Exception type 'exceptions.IndexError' list index out of range Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug fortran/53478] New: gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 Bug #: 53478 Summary: gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug debug/53471] [4.8 LTO] ICE in pp_base_format, at pretty-print.c:510 (-flto -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/53471] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in pp_base_format, at pretty-print.c:510 (-flto -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|debug |lto Target

[Bug lto/53470] [4.8 LTO] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53476] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-05-24 17:57:26 UTC --- On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:23:50PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: #1 0x0050aa91 in gfc_verify_binding_labels (sym=0x203cd1280)

[Bug c++/53322] Wunused-local-typedefs is not enabled by Wall or Wunused

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53322 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #9 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-05-24 18:38:40 UTC --- manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit: So either one keeps track of all source locations of all interesting characters

[Bug bootstrap/53459] ../../work/libcpp/lex.c:593:18: error: typedef 'check_count' locally defined but not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459 --- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-05-24 18:43:52 UTC --- Right, and there is: #elif (GCC_VERSION = 4005) defined(__ALTIVEC__) right before the offending line, which explains why I haven't seen the

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-05-24 18:44:54 UTC --- On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:57:26PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: This patch allows the code to compile. I haven't

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 19:05:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit: So either one keeps track of all source locations of all

[Bug c++/53479] New: Control flow analysis too alarming with switch over an enum class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479 Bug #: 53479 Summary: Control flow analysis too alarming with switch over an enum class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/53480] New: warning may be used uninitialized issued with -m32 but not with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480 Bug #: 53480 Summary: warning may be used uninitialized issued with -m32 but not with -m64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-05-24 19:35:09 UTC --- Are we really sure that gen_compile_unit_die() shouldn't being emitting calling add_comp_dir_attribute in this case. It seems that the origin of test...

[Bug tree-optimization/53480] warning may be used uninitialized issued with -m32 but not with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c

[Bug c++/50477] -Wunused-parameter should not warn about virtual method declarations with bodies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 19:46:02 UTC --- I sympathize with your argument, but I think that some users will want the current behavior. One way you could work around this that wouldn't involve

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-05-24 19:52:04 UTC --- Are we sure this test for... /* Don't add cwd for built-in. */ if (!IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (filename) filename[0] != '')

[Bug fortran/53481] New: Allow for gfortran (f951) specs option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53481 Bug #: 53481 Summary: Allow for gfortran (f951) specs option Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/53479] Control flow analysis reports warnings in switch over an enum class even if all possible values have their branches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 19:57:19 UTC --- Foo f = Foo(2); assert( DoFoo( f ) ); Undefined behaviour.

[Bug fortran/53481] Allow for gfortran (f951) specs option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53481 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 19:59:20 UTC --- The trick is to edit cc1_options instead of *cc1.

[Bug c++/53479] Control flow analysis reports warnings in switch over an enum class even if all possible values have their branches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479 --- Comment #2 from Georg Rudoy 0xd34df00d at gmail dot com 2012-05-24 20:04:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Foo f = Foo(2); assert( DoFoo( f ) ); Undefined behaviour. Yes, it is. And isn't it happening at the point of cast of an

[Bug bootstrap/53459] ../../work/libcpp/lex.c:593:18: error: typedef 'check_count' locally defined but not used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug debug/53453] darwin linker expects both AT_name and AT_comp_dir debug notes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 20:12:52 UTC --- It is correct and desirable. If you really need and we want to continue the endless stream of workarounds for Darwin toolchain bugs, then you'd add some

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 20:19:46 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu May 24 20:19:37 2012 New Revision: 187846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187846 Log: PR 53456 CPU timing fallback

  1   2   >