http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2012-05-25 06:56:06 UTC ---
This looks indeed like an odd compiler error and one really needs all three
specifiers static, constexpr, and *any* exception-specification to produce the
problem. For completeness th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-24
23:26:22 UTC ---
Proposed patch bootstraps on x86_64-apple-darwin12 under Xcode 4.4 and
eliminates the dsymutil warnings for...
gcc-fsf-4.8
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20120524/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-24
23:22:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 27494
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27494
proposed patch to emit AT_comp_dir on darwin using target hook
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Bemmel 2012-05-24
23:21:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't think the RTD calling convention is supported on Linux at all. In
> fact
> if you don't have your glibc compiled with it, there is no way for t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25811
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-24
22:34:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> You cannot invoke the C99 standard when there is concurrency in your program,
> as the standard doesn't deal with it at all.
Though C++11/C11 does but we do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-redhat-linux
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
--- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Bemmel 2012-05-24
22:19:33 UTC ---
The gcc_assert which fails is in i386.c line 10897 (latest SVN):
/* Stack align doesn't work with eh_return. */
gcc_assert (!stack_realign_drap);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
22:17:15 UTC ---
I think you should post your ongoing work on the mailing lists (gcc-patches and
CC libstdc++)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53483
Bug #: 53483
Summary: unwind.inc:140:1: internal compiler error: in
ix86_expand_epilogue, at config/i386/i386.c:11176
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53482
Bug #: 53482
Summary: -mtune=pentium[pro, 2, 3, 4], insn does not satisfy
constraints
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-05-24
21:06:24 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk (4.8).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-05-24
21:05:55 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu May 24 21:05:49 2012
New Revision: 187853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187853
Log:
PR bootstrap/53459 - unused local typedef when bui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-05-24
21:05:55 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu May 24 21:05:49 2012
New Revision: 187853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187853
Log:
PR bootstrap/53459 - unused local typedef when bui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-24 20:39:20 UTC ---
Would something like the following fixincludes hacks work?
/*
* Wrap VxWorks ioctl to keep everything pretty
*/
fix = {
hackname= vxworks_ioctl_macro;
files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #11 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-05-24 20:30:10 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
>> With the current infrastructure, I fear we cannot re-process the format
>> string *after* the initial pre-processing phase is done,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-24
20:21:57 UTC ---
No, there's nothing wrong with the cast.
A scoped enumeration type without an explicitly-specified underlying type has a
fixed underlying type of int, so the values of the enumerati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-05-24 20:19:46
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 24 20:19:37 2012
New Revision: 187846
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187846
Log:
PR 53456 CPU timing fallback using clock_gettime.
2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
20:12:52 UTC ---
It is correct and desirable. If you really need and we want to continue the
endless stream of workarounds for Darwin toolchain bugs, then you'd add some
target macro TARGET_FORCE_AT_C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479
--- Comment #2 from Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d at gmail dot com> 2012-05-24
20:04:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Foo f = Foo(2);
> assert( DoFoo( f ) );
>
> Undefined behaviour.
Yes, it is. And isn't it happening at the point of cast of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53481
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-24
19:59:20 UTC ---
The trick is to edit cc1_options instead of *cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-24
19:57:19 UTC ---
Foo f = Foo(2);
assert( DoFoo( f ) );
Undefined behaviour.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53481
Bug #: 53481
Summary: Allow for gfortran (f951) specs option
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-24
19:52:04 UTC ---
Are we sure this test for...
/* Don't add cwd for . */
if (!IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (filename) && filename[0] != '<')
add_comp_dir_attribute (die);
is still required? Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-24
19:46:02 UTC ---
I sympathize with your argument, but I think that some users will want the
current behavior. One way you could work around this that wouldn't involve
uglifying every affected function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from And
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-24
19:35:09 UTC ---
Are we really sure that gen_compile_unit_die() shouldn't being emitting calling
add_comp_dir_attribute in this case. It seems that the origin of test...
/* Don't add cwd for .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480
Bug #: 53480
Summary: warning "may be used uninitialized" issued with -m32
but not with -m64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53479
Bug #: 53479
Summary: Control flow analysis too alarming with switch over an
enum class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-24
19:05:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
>
> > So either one keeps track of all source locations of all "interesting"
> > characters within strings, which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2012-05-24 18:44:54 UTC ---
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:57:26PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> This patch allows the code to compile. I haven't
> tried to construct a longer example that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
--- Comment #1 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-05-24 18:43:52 UTC ---
Right, and there is:
#elif (GCC_VERSION >= 4005) && defined(__ALTIVEC__)
right before the offending line, which explains why I haven't seen the
bootstrap error before com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #9 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-05-24 18:38:40 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
> So either one keeps track of all source locations of all "interesting"
> characters within strings, which sounds infeasible. Or one n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53322
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl
2012-05-24 17:57:26 UTC ---
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:23:50PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> #1 0x0050aa91 in gfc_verify_binding_labels (sym=0x203cd1280)
> at ../../gcc4x/gcc/fortran/resolve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |lto
Target Milestone|4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
Bug #: 53478
Summary: gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C
binding name of procedure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
Bug #: 53477
Summary: pretty printer fails with: Python Exception list index out of range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
15:29:42 UTC ---
Manuel, what happened to this, out of curiosity? I see an Assigned status (but
the Assigned To field still blank) and a documentation patchlet of yours in the
audit trail?!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25751
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25751
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53412
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-24 15:12:45 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 24 15:12:37 2012
New Revision: 187842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187842
Log:
2012-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455
--- Comment #8 from Jonas Wielicki 2012-05-24 14:48:23 UTC ---
I was able to use the VM sooner than expected, so sorry for the doublepost.
I found that whether using no_init or init<>() does not make a difference in my
case. To use init<>() on th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32080
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-24 14:47:12 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 24 14:47:06 2012
New Revision: 187837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187837
Log:
/cp
2012-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
14:41:59 UTC ---
Please try to narrow the commit which is causing the problem a bit more: to be
really honest, it's the first time in my life I see this kind of error message
and I really doubt the lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455
--- Comment #7 from Jonas Wielicki 2012-05-24 14:32:37 UTC ---
Interestingly, I am using no_init too, but without supplying an alternative
constructor. I am not at the testing machine right now, but I thought I'd share
that bit of information. Tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
Bug #: 53476
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Bug #: 53475
Summary: Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455
Neal Becker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndbecker2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53472
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5911
online games changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter78 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53474
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20624
online games changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter78 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
--- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt
2012-05-24 13:54:24 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu May 24 13:54:16 2012
New Revision: 187835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187835
Log:
2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
--- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt
2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012
New Revision: 187834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187834
Log:
2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53385
--- Comment #14 from William J. Schmidt
2012-05-24 13:53:03 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu May 24 13:52:56 2012
New Revision: 187834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187834
Log:
2012-05-24 Bill Schmidt
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-05-24
13:53:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> gcc hasn't changed the emitted DWARF in this case for more than 12 years.
Actually Apple gcc-4.2.1 doesn't seem to emit AT_comp_dir either but both
llvm-gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53474
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
-solaris2.11
As of 20120524, Solaris/x86 bootstrap with Sun as is broken configuring the
stage1
libgcc:
configure:4192: checking whether to use setjmp/longjmp exceptions
configure:: /var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc/build/./gcc/
-B/vol/gcc/i386-pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Bug #: 53473
Summary: [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be
specialized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53472
Bug #: 53472
Summary: contrib/compare-debug should strip out .comment
section
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #37 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-24
13:08:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> REMAINING issues:
> - comment 24 first "Does not work.", see also comment 34
One has in gfc_trans_assignment_1:
string_length = gfc_evaluate_now (rse.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
Greta Yorsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49954
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-24
12:50:21 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 24 12:50:15 2012
New Revision: 187832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187832
Log:
2012-05-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-24
12:46:57 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 24 12:46:53 2012
New Revision: 187831
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187831
Log:
2012-05-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-24
12:36:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 24 12:36:40 2012
New Revision: 187830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187830
Log:
2012-05-24 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24375
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42129
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
12:04:17 UTC ---
Pinging Nathan, maybe we can do this for 4.8...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39679
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|susanin at ispras dot ru|g...@integrable-solutions.ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
11:53:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 24 11:53:29 2012
New Revision: 187828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187828
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53465
* tree-vrp.c (ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24
11:51:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 24 11:51:09 2012
New Revision: 187827
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187827
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53465
* tree-vrp.c (ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-24
11:39:10 UTC ---
Later today I will add it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-24
10:50:42 UTC ---
We have an unreachable block:
# BLOCK 4
# PRED:
:
operator delete (D.2260_4);
# SUCC: 5 [100.0%] (fallthru)
after profiling. Somehow we transform
void offsetToMiddleOfG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53471
Bug #: 53471
Summary: [4.8 LTO] ICE in pp_base_format, at pretty-print.c:510
(-flto -g)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
