http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-02
04:05:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 2 04:05:25 2012
New Revision: 188138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188138
Log:
PR c++/52973
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-02
04:03:57 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 2 04:03:51 2012
New Revision: 188137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188137
Log:
PR c++/52973
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Bug #: 53561
Summary: [c++0x] regex_replace is missing overloads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g++bug at oxyware dot com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53560
Bug #: 53560
Summary: Internal compiler error with += and void function
(invalid source)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
21:36:35 UTC ---
The bug here is that we aren't applying the visibility attribute to b until
after we've decided that a is hidden because b is hidden. Changing the code
to
template class __attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
21:19:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 21:19:22 2012
New Revision: 188127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188127
Log:
PR c++/52725
* parser.c (cp_parser_binary_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
21:19:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 21:19:22 2012
New Revision: 188127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188127
Log:
PR c++/52725
* parser.c (cp_parser_binary_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
--- Comment #7 from eggert at gnu dot org 2012-06-01 21:19:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 27546
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27546
alternate test case, for x86, showing "({anonymous}) might be clobbered"
By compiling on x86 (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #10 from dougkwan at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 20:43:37 UTC ---
Author: dougkwan
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:43:31 2012
New Revision: 188126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188126
Log:
2012-06-01 Doug Kwan
Backp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
eggert at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.7.0
--- Comment #6 from eggert a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-01
20:40:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:40:36 2012
New Revision: 188125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188125
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-01
20:06:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:06:39 2012
New Revision: 188124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188124
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
Bug #: 53559
Summary: ICE on altivec builtins stv[l|r]x[l]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558
Bug #: 53558
Summary: Register allocator doesn't tie return value register
to output variable.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
18:43:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 18:43:34 2012
New Revision: 188123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188123
Log:
PR c++/53137
* pt.c (instantiate_class_temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
18:43:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 18:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188122
Log:
PR c++/53484
* pt.c (do_auto_deduction): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53526
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-01
17:54:42 UTC ---
MOVE_ALLOC - following the current interpretation request - seems to be more
complicated that I had imagined:
It's unclear to me whether the users have to invoke it on all images (lik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-01
17:03:27 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 17:03:19 2012
New Revision: 188119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188119
Log:
PR middle-end/53501
* fold-const.c (fol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-01
17:01:22 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 17:01:17 2012
New Revision: 188118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188118
Log:
PR middle-end/53501
* fold-const.c (fol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53443
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
16:55:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:55:17 2012
New Revision: 188117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188117
Log:
PR c++/53137
* pt.c (instantiate_class_temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-01
16:55:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:55:08 2012
New Revision: 188116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188116
Log:
PR c++/53484
* pt.c (do_auto_deduction): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53557
Bug #: 53557
Summary: Cross compiling for m68k-linux fails as
doesn't exist
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-06-01
16:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 27543
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27543
Proposed patch by Richard Henderson-- untested
This is an old, untested patch from rth that attempt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44553
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan at danny dot cz
--- Comment #4 from Dan H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-01 16:11:44 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:11:38 2012
New Revision: 188113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188113
Log:
/cp
2012-06-01 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-01
15:43:59 UTC ---
I think this is a duplicate of an old bug, but the carets do make it more
noticeable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-01
15:08:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 15:08:24 2012
New Revision: 188111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188111
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #27 from Sean McGovern 2012-06-01
14:23:21 UTC ---
I just found out how ugly this can get.
freopen(3C) has different behaviour in the case where the first argument is
NULL depending on if SUSv3 behaviour has been enabled by including
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53556
Bug #: 53556
Summary: [F03] associated intrinsic does not work with
procedure pointers in subroutines
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kjslag at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kjslag at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53554
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43718
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
Bug #: 53555
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53554
Bug #: 53554
Summary: -Q --help= gives inaccurate target-specific
information
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52971
dhowe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #16 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-06-01 13:27:55 UTC ---
in case it helps
run -fpreprocessed test.i -O2 -o bha.s
Starting program: /home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed test.i
-O2 -o bha.s
reading VI .tcshrc
tty
resize:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #3 from Conrad 2012-06-01
13:27:47 UTC ---
arma::ivec3 from Armadillo works under gcc 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3).
This bug might be related to 52470 and 52685:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52470
http://gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
Bug #: 53553
Summary: misleading locations for error in initializers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
Bug #: 53552
Summary: Add support for !GCC$ warning directive (cf. #pragma
warning)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35015
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 12:31:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
> > bootstrapped compiler ICEs with the posted testc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-01
12:29:11 UTC ---
I'd think
--- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c.jj2012-05-30 14:38:55.0 +0200
+++ tree-ssa-loop-niter.c2012-06-01 14:27:43.202456745 +0200
@@ -1276,13 +1276,14 @@ number_of_iterati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
--- Comment #1 from Akim Demaille 2012-06-01
12:24:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 27539
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27539
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
Bug #: 53551
Summary: -Wunused-local-typedefs misses uses
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-06-01 12:01:00 UTC ---
no need of lto just
/home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/
-B/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/w2/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/afs/cern.ch/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 11:54:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
> bootstrapped compiler ICEs with the posted testcases?
Yes.
> That would mean G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-01
11:50:33 UTC ---
You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
bootstrapped compiler ICEs with the posted testcases?
That would mean GCC is miscompiled, likely with a vectoriz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Bug #: 53550
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE with -O{1,2,3}
-fprefetch-loop-arrays in build2_stat, at tree.c:3803
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-06-01 11:44:57 UTC ---
Just a shot into the dark:
The only difference between glibc-2.12 and later in this area
is the introduction of SSE4.2 (SSSE3) support...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #2 from Christoffer Hirth 2012-06-01
10:39:15 UTC ---
I'm sorry that I forgot to include this. It is now uploaded to:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/82144428/main.ii
If more details are needed please let me know.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-06-01 10:20:09 UTC ---
On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
>
> --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30
> 15:28:1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Bug #: 53549
Summary: g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53015
brainschrat at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-06-01 09:18:00 UTC ---
any chance this bug gets attention anytime soon?
It blocks test and development with newish versions of glibc...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53546
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53019
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-01
08:47:11 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 1 08:47:06 2012
New Revision: 188103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188103
Log:
2012-06-01 Manuel López-Ibáñez
Jon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53019
--- Comment #6 from Adam Borowski 2012-06-01
08:04:43 UTC ---
Ok, works correctly on current trunk as well.
Since the testcase is messy and vulnerable to small alterations, and I guess
the underlying bug fixes already include a test for it, it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-01
08:04:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The patch of comment 1 fails for testsuite/gfortran.dg/import7.f90:
>
> TYPE(T3) X
>1
> Error: The type of 'x' at (1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-01
07:34:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:34:05 2012
New Revision: 188101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188101
Log:
PR ada/53517
* gnat.dg/lto14.adb: Skip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-01
07:33:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:33:38 2012
New Revision: 188100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188100
Log:
PR ada/53517
* gnat.dg/lto14.adb: Skip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-01
07:33:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:33:38 2012
New Revision: 188100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188100
Log:
PR ada/53517
* gnat.dg/lto14.adb: Skip
92 matches
Mail list logo
