http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
07:33:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:33:38 2012
New Revision: 188100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188100
Log:
PR ada/53517
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
07:33:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:33:38 2012
New Revision: 188100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188100
Log:
PR ada/53517
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
07:34:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 07:34:05 2012
New Revision: 188101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188101
Log:
PR ada/53517
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53517
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
08:04:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The patch of comment 1 fails for testsuite/gfortran.dg/import7.f90:
TYPE(T3) X
1
Error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53019
--- Comment #6 from Adam Borowski kilobyte at angband dot pl 2012-06-01
08:04:43 UTC ---
Ok, works correctly on current trunk as well.
Since the testcase is messy and vulnerable to small alterations, and I guess
the underlying bug fixes already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
08:47:11 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 1 08:47:06 2012
New Revision: 188103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188103
Log:
2012-06-01 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53019
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53546
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-01 09:18:00 UTC ---
any chance this bug gets attention anytime soon?
It blocks test and development with newish versions of glibc...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53015
brainschrat at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Bug #: 53549
Summary: g++ and armadillo 3.2.0, operator() is inaccessible
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
--- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-06-01 10:20:09 UTC ---
On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #2 from Christoffer Hirth admin at toffyrn dot net 2012-06-01
10:39:15 UTC ---
I'm sorry that I forgot to include this. It is now uploaded to:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/82144428/main.ii
If more details are needed please let me know.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-06-01 11:44:57 UTC ---
Just a shot into the dark:
The only difference between glibc-2.12 and later in this area
is the introduction of SSE4.2 (SSSE3) support...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Bug #: 53550
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE with -O{1,2,3}
-fprefetch-loop-arrays in build2_stat, at tree.c:3803
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
11:50:33 UTC ---
You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
bootstrapped compiler ICEs with the posted testcases?
That would mean GCC is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-06-01 11:54:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
bootstrapped compiler ICEs with the posted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-01 12:01:00 UTC ---
no need of lto just
/home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
Bug #: 53551
Summary: -Wunused-local-typedefs misses uses
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551
--- Comment #1 from Akim Demaille akim.demaille at gmail dot com 2012-06-01
12:24:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 27539
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27539
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
12:29:11 UTC ---
I'd think
--- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c.jj2012-05-30 14:38:55.0 +0200
+++ tree-ssa-loop-niter.c2012-06-01 14:27:43.202456745 +0200
@@ -1276,13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-06-01 12:31:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
You bootstrap-lto with -march=native -ftree-vectorize and then the
bootstrapped compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35015
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
Bug #: 53552
Summary: Add support for !GCC$ warning directive (cf. #pragma
warning)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
Bug #: 53553
Summary: misleading locations for error in initializers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #3 from Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com 2012-06-01
13:27:47 UTC ---
arma::ivec3 from Armadillo works under gcc 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3).
This bug might be related to 52470 and 52685:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
--- Comment #16 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-06-01 13:27:55 UTC ---
in case it helps
run -fpreprocessed test.i -O2 -o bha.s
Starting program: /home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed test.i
-O2 -o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52971
dhowe...@redhat.com dhowells at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53554
Bug #: 53554
Summary: -Q --help=class gives inaccurate target-specific
information
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
Bug #: 53555
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43718
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53554
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kjslag at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kjslag at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53556
Bug #: 53556
Summary: [F03] associated intrinsic does not work with
procedure pointers in subroutines
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #27 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2012-06-01
14:23:21 UTC ---
I just found out how ugly this can get.
freopen(3C) has different behaviour in the case where the first argument is
NULL depending on if SUSv3 behaviour has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
15:08:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 15:08:24 2012
New Revision: 188111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188111
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
15:43:59 UTC ---
I think this is a duplicate of an old bug, but the carets do make it more
noticeable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-01 16:11:44 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:11:38 2012
New Revision: 188113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188113
Log:
/cp
2012-06-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26155
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44553
Dan Horák dan at danny dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan at danny dot cz
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
16:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 27543
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27543
Proposed patch by Richard Henderson-- untested
This is an old, untested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53557
Bug #: 53557
Summary: Cross compiling for m68k-linux fails as asm/unistd.h
doesn't exist
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
16:55:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:55:08 2012
New Revision: 188116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188116
Log:
PR c++/53484
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
16:55:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 16:55:17 2012
New Revision: 188117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188117
Log:
PR c++/53137
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53443
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
17:01:22 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 17:01:17 2012
New Revision: 188118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188118
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
17:03:27 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 1 17:03:19 2012
New Revision: 188119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188119
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53526
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
17:54:42 UTC ---
MOVE_ALLOC - following the current interpretation request - seems to be more
complicated that I had imagined:
It's unclear to me whether the users have to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53552
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
18:43:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 18:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188122
Log:
PR c++/53484
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
18:43:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 18:43:34 2012
New Revision: 188123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188123
Log:
PR c++/53137
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53484
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558
Bug #: 53558
Summary: Register allocator doesn't tie return value register
to output variable.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
Bug #: 53559
Summary: ICE on altivec builtins stv[l|r]x[l]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
20:06:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:06:39 2012
New Revision: 188124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188124
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
20:40:45 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:40:36 2012
New Revision: 188125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188125
Log:
2012-06-01 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
eggert at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.7.0
--- Comment #6 from eggert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #10 from dougkwan at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01 20:43:37 UTC ---
Author: dougkwan
Date: Fri Jun 1 20:43:31 2012
New Revision: 188126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188126
Log:
2012-06-01 Doug Kwan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968
--- Comment #7 from eggert at gnu dot org 2012-06-01 21:19:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 27546
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27546
alternate test case, for x86, showing ({anonymous}) might be clobbered
By compiling on x86 (as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
21:19:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 21:19:22 2012
New Revision: 188127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188127
Log:
PR c++/52725
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
21:19:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 1 21:19:22 2012
New Revision: 188127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188127
Log:
PR c++/52725
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-01
21:36:35 UTC ---
The bug here is that we aren't applying the visibility attribute to b until
after we've decided that ab is hidden because b is hidden. Changing the code
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53560
Bug #: 53560
Summary: Internal compiler error with += and void function
(invalid source)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53560
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53491
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g++bug at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Bug #: 53561
Summary: [c++0x] regex_replace is missing overloads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561
Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-02
04:03:57 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 2 04:03:51 2012
New Revision: 188137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188137
Log:
PR c++/52973
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-02
04:05:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jun 2 04:05:25 2012
New Revision: 188138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188138
Log:
PR c++/52973
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
92 matches
Mail list logo
