http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596
--- Comment #3 from kim.walisch at gmail dot com 2012-06-07 07:31:41 UTC ---
Hi, thanks for your answer but I still think it is a bug. Here are my reasons:
1) You mention that Clang also warns for my example but this seems to be a bug
in Clang, se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596
--- Comment #4 from kim.walisch at gmail dot com 2012-06-07 08:28:05 UTC ---
I found another post on the web
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110530/042333.html)
that explains the warning, it says:
"If Derived (see abo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596
kim.walisch at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53598
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-07
08:46:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi, thanks for your answer but I still think it is a bug. Here are my reasons:
>
> 1) You mention that Clang also warns for my example but this seems to b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-06-07
08:53:43 UTC ---
I summarized all this in
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#delete-non-virtual-dtor but I am
afraid it is not a very good summary, please feel free to improve it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53593
--- Comment #2 from atcl 2012-06-07 08:55:11 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This pragma is a control for the equivalent of the option
> -fprefetch-loop-arrays .
>
> You might want to try out -fprefetch-loop-arrays out.
Well, but what about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599
--- Comment #3 from Philipp 2012-06-07 09:14:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 27575
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27575
Reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-07
09:36:26 UTC ---
Even shorter (but invalid):
template
struct C
{
};
template
struct E
{
static bool const value = true;
};
template
int
foo ()
{
struct F;
struct G
{
static int *(F::*b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07
11:12:02 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 7 11:11:55 2012
New Revision: 188300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188300
Log:
2012-06-07 Thomas König
PR fortran/52861
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53591
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Bug #: 53601
Summary: g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
Bug #: 53602
Summary: Libre Office causes an internal compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603
Bug #: 53603
Summary: abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even
with -Wall -Wextra
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-07
13:27:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 27576
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27576
pr53595.diff
And here is a tentative patch:
Let HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED return false if H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27576|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-07
13:55:05 UTC ---
Use -Wconversion:
[macbook] f90/bug% gcc48 -Wconversion pr53603.c
pr53603.c: In function 'main':
pr53603.c:6:9: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'double' may alter its value
[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50347
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at richardneill dot org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07
14:33:56 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 7 14:33:51 2012
New Revision: 188305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188305
Log:
2012-06-07 Thomas König
PR fortran/52861
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603
--- Comment #3 from Richard Neill 2012-06-07
14:41:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your explanation. I didn't know about -Wconversion existing
independently of -Wextra.
Might I suggest a couple of things that arise:
1. It seems a bit strange to me that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51938
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from Marc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
--- Comment #3 from NagaJyothi Eggone
2012-06-07 14:55:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 27578
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27578
bzip2 compressed pre-processed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-07
14:56:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1. It seems a bit strange to me that there are warnings that are not enabled
> by
> -Wall -Wextra. The man page lists so many different types of warning:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07
14:58:38 UTC ---
I'll do a bit of work on that, because it can also be useful
for reducing memcpy/memset pairs.
Consider
character(len=3) :: a
character(len=4) :: b
a = 'a'
b = 'a'
This coul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Bug #: 53604
Summary: ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from
gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-07
15:25:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 27579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27579
Proof-of-concept patch (works but has many regression-test failures)
(In reply to comment #5)
> Fixe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Benton 2012-06-07
15:26:13 UTC ---
Genius idea! Unfortunately the preprocessor output skeletoncommon.ii is more
than 2MB and so I can't attach it to this bug. I've put it here
http://benton.eu.com/skeletoncommon.ii
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-06-07
15:45:19 UTC ---
Remember that you can always compress it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-07
15:49:38 UTC ---
I think for 4.7.1 let's just revert that patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-07 15:50:56
UTC ---
I think it is a dup for PR 53572. Can you try patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572#c3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537
--- Comment #9 from Hossein Talebi 2012-06-07
16:03:09 UTC ---
I think I found where the problem is. It is not with the trim(). It is mostly
with read (st_input_all(j),*,IOSTAT=ios) I50(1:50).
I attach a self contained program. With intel it tak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Benton 2012-06-07
16:12:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 27580
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27580
skeletoncommon.ii preprocessor output compressed
(In reply to comment #3)
> Remember that you can al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52552
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #2 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-07
17:14:13 UTC ---
The 4.7.0 code is different so the patch didn't work:
'struct varpool_node' has no member named 'symbol'
I'm not familiar with the gcc internals so I'm not sure what I need to add to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605
Bug #: 53605
Summary: Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] [C++11]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53535
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-06-07
20:44:06 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jun 7 20:44:01 2012
New Revision: 188317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188317
Log:
PR middle-end/53535
* gcc.dg/pr46647.c: x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288
Hubert Tong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-07
21:40:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 27581
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27581
pr53602.ii
Slightly reduced testcase for -m32 -Os -std=c++11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52850
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-06-07
21:59:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 27582
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27582
Proposed fix
Since the in-tree zlib is always built as a static archive, we can link it in
with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Bug #: 53606
Summary: Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to
know better than the Standard
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-06-07
22:49:52 UTC ---
Mainline seems fine, anyway.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-08
00:30:14 UTC ---
This is a GNU extension, if you use -pedantic to disable it then 4.6 and 4.7
compile the code without a diagnostic.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607
Bug #: 53607
Summary: opt-functions.awk --> "awk: There is a regular
expression error."
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53608
Bug #: 53608
Summary: Documentation could be clearer about designated
initializers of unions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-08
06:43:51 UTC ---
Yeah, I agree with that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:32 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012
New Revision: 188327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327
Log:
Backport mainline r179607, r179979, r179980,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126
--- Comment #12 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:32 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012
New Revision: 188327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327
Log:
Backport mainline r179607, r179979, r179980
63 matches
Mail list logo