[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

2012-06-07 Thread kim.walisch at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #3 from kim.walisch at gmail dot com 2012-06-07 07:31:41 UTC --- Hi, thanks for your answer but I still think it is a bug. Here are my reasons: 1) You mention that Clang also warns for my example but this seems to be a bug in Clang, se

[Bug c++/53599] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

2012-06-07 Thread kim.walisch at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #4 from kim.walisch at gmail dot com 2012-06-07 08:28:05 UTC --- I found another post on the web (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110530/042333.html) that explains the warning, it says: "If Derived (see abo

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

2012-06-07 Thread kim.walisch at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 kim.walisch at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c++/53598] missed diagnostics / equality comparison result unused.

2012-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53598 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

2012-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-07 08:46:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi, thanks for your answer but I still think it is a bug. Here are my reasons: > > 1) You mention that Clang also warns for my example but this seems to b

[Bug c++/53596] g++-4.7 -Wall shouldn't complain for non-virtual protected dtor

2012-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53596 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-06-07 08:53:43 UTC --- I summarized all this in http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#delete-non-virtual-dtor but I am afraid it is not a very good summary, please feel free to improve it.

[Bug c/53593] #pragma prefetch

2012-06-07 Thread litro at graasmilk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53593 --- Comment #2 from atcl 2012-06-07 08:55:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > This pragma is a control for the equivalent of the option > -fprefetch-loop-arrays . > > You might want to try out -fprefetch-loop-arrays out. Well, but what about

[Bug c++/53599] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

2012-06-07 Thread s...@s-e-f-i.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 --- Comment #3 from Philipp 2012-06-07 09:14:56 UTC --- Created attachment 27575 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27575 Reduced testcase

[Bug c++/53599] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-07 09:36:26 UTC --- Even shorter (but invalid): template struct C { }; template struct E { static bool const value = true; }; template int foo () { struct F; struct G { static int *(F::*b

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07 11:12:02 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jun 7 11:11:55 2012 New Revision: 188300 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188300 Log: 2012-06-07 Thomas König PR fortran/52861

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53591] Front-end optimize empty string assignments

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53591 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/53601] New: g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast

2012-06-07 Thread nagajyothi.eggone at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601 Bug #: 53601 Summary: g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/53601] g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/53602] New: Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread andy at benton dot eu.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Bug #: 53602 Summary: Libre Office causes an internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/53602] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/53601] g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast

2012-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/53603] New: abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra

2012-06-07 Thread gcc at richardneill dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603 Bug #: 53603 Summary: abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

2012-06-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

2012-06-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-07 13:27:33 UTC --- Created attachment 27576 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27576 pr53595.diff And here is a tentative patch: Let HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED return false if H

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

2012-06-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27576|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/53603] abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra

2012-06-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-07 13:55:05 UTC --- Use -Wconversion: [macbook] f90/bug% gcc48 -Wconversion pr53603.c pr53603.c: In function 'main': pr53603.c:6:9: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'double' may alter its value [

[Bug c/50347] unexpected -Wconversion error from gcc builtin

2012-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50347 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/53603] abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra

2012-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/53001] -Wfloat-conversion should be available to warn about floating point errors

2012-06-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at richardneill dot org --- Com

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07 14:33:56 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jun 7 14:33:51 2012 New Revision: 188305 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188305 Log: 2012-06-07 Thomas König PR fortran/52861

[Bug c/53603] abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra

2012-06-07 Thread gcc at richardneill dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603 --- Comment #3 from Richard Neill 2012-06-07 14:41:10 UTC --- Thanks for your explanation. I didn't know about -Wconversion existing independently of -Wextra. Might I suggest a couple of things that arise: 1. It seems a bit strange to me that

[Bug libfortran/52537] slow trim function

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51938] missed optimization: 2 comparisons

2012-06-07 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51938 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #4 from Marc

[Bug other/53601] g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast

2012-06-07 Thread nagajyothi.eggone at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601 --- Comment #3 from NagaJyothi Eggone 2012-06-07 14:55:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27578 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27578 bzip2 compressed pre-processed file

[Bug c/53603] abs() doesn't warn if argument is double, not even with -Wall -Wextra

2012-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53603 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-07 14:56:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1. It seems a bit strange to me that there are warnings that are not enabled > by > -Wall -Wextra. The man page lists so many different types of warning:

[Bug fortran/48543] Collapse identical strings

2012-06-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-07 14:58:38 UTC --- I'll do a bit of work on that, because it can also be useful for reducing memcpy/memset pairs. Consider character(len=3) :: a character(len=4) :: b a = 'a' b = 'a' This coul

[Bug lto/53604] New: ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0

2012-06-07 Thread paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604 Bug #: 53604 Summary: ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

2012-06-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-07 15:25:37 UTC --- Created attachment 27579 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27579 Proof-of-concept patch (works but has many regression-test failures) (In reply to comment #5) > Fixe

[Bug c++/53602] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread andy at benton dot eu.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Benton 2012-06-07 15:26:13 UTC --- Genius idea! Unfortunately the preprocessor output skeletoncommon.ii is more than 2MB and so I can't attach it to this bug. I've put it here http://benton.eu.com/skeletoncommon.ii The

[Bug fortran/52861] (missed optimisation) missed transformation to memset with -O3

2012-06-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52861 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/53602] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-06-07 15:45:19 UTC --- Remember that you can always compress it.

[Bug c++/53599] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

2012-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-07 15:49:38 UTC --- I think for 4.7.1 let's just revert that patch.

[Bug lto/53604] ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0

2012-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-07 15:50:56 UTC --- I think it is a dup for PR 53572. Can you try patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572#c3

[Bug libfortran/52537] slow trim function

2012-06-07 Thread talebi.hossein at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52537 --- Comment #9 from Hossein Talebi 2012-06-07 16:03:09 UTC --- I think I found where the problem is. It is not with the trim(). It is mostly with read (st_input_all(j),*,IOSTAT=ios) I50(1:50). I attach a self contained program. With intel it tak

[Bug c++/53602] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread andy at benton dot eu.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Benton 2012-06-07 16:12:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27580 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27580 skeletoncommon.ii preprocessor output compressed (In reply to comment #3) > Remember that you can al

[Bug fortran/52552] [OOP] ICE when trying to allocate non-allocatable object giving a dynamic type

2012-06-07 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52552 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/53604] ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0

2012-06-07 Thread paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604 --- Comment #2 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-07 17:14:13 UTC --- The 4.7.0 code is different so the patch didn't work: 'struct varpool_node' has no member named 'symbol' I'm not familiar with the gcc internals so I'm not sure what I need to add to

[Bug c++/53605] New: Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-07 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 Bug #: 53605 Summary: Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/53601] g++ ICE compiling minion with -Ofast

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

2012-06-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] [C++11]

[Bug c++/53605] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53535] non-aligned memset on non-strict-alignment targets not optimized where aligned memset is

2012-06-07 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53535 --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-06-07 20:44:06 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Jun 7 20:44:01 2012 New Revision: 188317 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188317 Log: PR middle-end/53535 * gcc.dg/pr46647.c: x

[Bug c++/53288] [C++11] Lifetime of temporary object backing pointer-to-member expression not extended

2012-06-07 Thread hstong at ca dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288 Hubert Tong changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code Version|4.6.0

[Bug c++/53602] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-07 21:40:25 UTC --- Created attachment 27581 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27581 pr53602.ii Slightly reduced testcase for -m32 -Os -std=c++11.

[Bug c++/53602] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Libre Office causes an internal compiler error

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53602 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Version|unknown

[Bug bootstrap/52850] Linker path ends up using wrong zlib

2012-06-07 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52850 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-06-07 21:59:39 UTC --- Created attachment 27582 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27582 Proposed fix Since the in-tree zlib is always built as a static archive, we can link it in with

[Bug c++/53606] New: Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to know better than the Standard

2012-06-07 Thread hstong at ca dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606 Bug #: 53606 Summary: Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to know better than the Standard Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Statu

[Bug c++/53606] Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to know better than the Standard

2012-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-06-07 22:49:52 UTC --- Mainline seems fine, anyway.

[Bug c++/53606] Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to know better than the Standard

2012-06-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-08 00:30:14 UTC --- This is a GNU extension, if you use -pedantic to disable it then 4.6 and 4.7 compile the code without a diagnostic.

[Bug c++/53606] Invalid candidate chosen; warning message claims to know better than the Standard

2012-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53606 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52363] Presence/absence of -pedantic compilation affects run-time behavior

2012-06-07 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52363 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hstong at ca dot ibm.com --- Comment #14

[Bug bootstrap/53607] New: opt-functions.awk --> "awk: There is a regular expression error."

2012-06-07 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607 Bug #: 53607 Summary: opt-functions.awk --> "awk: There is a regular expression error." Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug web/53608] New: Documentation could be clearer about designated initializers of unions

2012-06-07 Thread alan.coopersmith at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53608 Bug #: 53608 Summary: Documentation could be clearer about designated initializers of unions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/53599] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc-4.7.1_rc20120606 segfaults compiling boost.karma

2012-06-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53599 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-08 06:43:51 UTC --- Yeah, I agree with that.

[Bug target/51408] Miscompilation in arm.md:*minmax_arithsi

2012-06-07 Thread jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408 --- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:32 UTC --- Author: jye2 Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012 New Revision: 188327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327 Log: Backport mainline r179607, r179979, r179980,

[Bug target/48126] arm_output_sync_loop: misplaced memory barrier

2012-06-07 Thread jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126 --- Comment #12 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:32 UTC --- Author: jye2 Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012 New Revision: 188327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327 Log: Backport mainline r179607, r179979, r179980