[Bug other/28145] C++ (throw() and catch(...) {/* fall through */ } ) and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28145 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILTINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 --- Comment #20 from nightstrike 2012-06-22 02:05:45 UTC --- As we're in 4.8 now, consider this a friendly ping :)

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:33:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012 New Revision: 188869 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * var-tracking.c (

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:33:26 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012 New Revision: 188869 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * var-tracking.c (

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:33:26 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:33:21 2012 New Revision: 188869 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188869 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * var-tracking.c (

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:30:23 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:30:16 2012 New Revision: 188868 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188868 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * alias.c (memrefs

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:30:21 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:30:16 2012 New Revision: 188868 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188868 Log: PR debug/53671 PR debug/49888 * alias.c (memrefs

[Bug target/53682] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cselib_lookup (SEGV) on i586-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-22 01:29:33 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Jun 22 01:29:28 2012 New Revision: 188866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188866 Log: PR debug/53682 * cselib.c (promote_debug_loc): D

[Bug c++/53651] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] seg fault when specifying using decltype(...)::method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53651 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53702] [4.8 Regression] ICE with -Wall and nested functions and unused typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702 meadori at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/53732] [4.7/4.8 Regression] "mismatching comparison operand types" on compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-21 20:32:48 UTC --- > Well, it did!-) The patch even fixed the PR (no regression with -m32, further > testing in progress). Testing finished without anything to report. > I wonder if > > - if (

[Bug c/53702] [4.8 Regression] ICE with -Wall and nested functions and unused typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53702 --- Comment #4 from meadori at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-21 20:20:36 UTC --- Author: meadori Date: Thu Jun 21 20:20:30 2012 New Revision: 188860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188860 Log: PR c/53702 * c-decl.c (c_push

[Bug ada/53747] New: Rep clause on index type makes 'access of aliased component an error when renaming

Otherwise, $ gnatmake -gnatwa -gnatv aliasing.ads gcc -c -gnatwa -gnatv aliasing.ads GNAT 4.8.0 20120621 (experimental) Copyright 1992-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc. Compiling: aliasing.ads (source file time stamp: 2012-06-21 19:52:03) ==Error messages for source file:

[Bug fortran/39654] ABI bug: FTELL intrinsic function not capable of large files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/50048] "cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead" during bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50048 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/39654] ABI bug: FTELL intrinsic function not capable of large files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-06-21 18:47:06 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Jun 21 18:47:01 2012 New Revision: 188858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188858 Log: PR 39654 FTELL intrinsic function return type. fron

[Bug c++/53745] [C++11] Poor diagnostic for ill-formed narrowing conversion in enumerator initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/53746] [lto] segfault in std::vector::__base_ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug target/16331] x86-64 inline asm register constraints insufficient WRT ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16331 Christian Häggström changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at kalvdans dot

[Bug lto/53746] New: [lto] segfault in std::vector::__base_ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746 Bug #: 53746 Summary: [lto] segfault in std::vector::__base_ctor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646 --- Comment #21 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 15:32:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > certainty. But it wouldn't have helped me that much further. I still would > have had to find out which functions were causing the wild write in order >

[Bug other/46125] -mcmodel=large doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46125 Adrian Smith changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adrian.m.smith at gmail dot

[Bug c++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646 --- Comment #20 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 15:25:59 UTC --- As I stumbled over this problem complex recently already I had a hunch that it might again be a 11/98 mixture. Having the symbols would have made that a certainty. But it wouldn't ha

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 15:23:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not: The patch doesn't pass the bootstrap.

[Bug fortran/53732] [4.7/4.8 Regression] "mismatching comparison operand types" on compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-21 15:07:58 UTC --- > [*] Carefully crafted with love and patience, using the ancestral methods and > tools available to the windows users (i.e. Notepad.exe). > In other words, the patch may not ap

[Bug c++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21 14:46:22 UTC --- Do you have an opinion on PR 53673 ? Would having those symbols make debugging such problems easier, or did you already know there was a mix of c++98 and c++11 objects and the diffi

[Bug fortran/53694] [OOP] GENERIC type-bound procs should be available without part-ref syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53694 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-21 14:39:32 UTC --- Actually, I am no longer sure that this PR is valid - nor is Richard Maine in c.l.f. Janus seems to have the same doubts, if I read comment 5 correctly. The standard seems to make a d

[Bug c++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646 --- Comment #18 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 14:36:29 UTC --- Just today I had to debug another crash in our package management code. This time a c++98 library picked up a std::list operator= from a c++11 library resulting in a crash. See http

[Bug c++/53741] ICE on lambda calling static template member function with explicit template argument specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53741 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/53745] Bitshifted value (1 << 31) within enumerator class is calculated incorrectly during compilation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21 13:36:24 UTC --- The initializer must be converted constant expression of type unsigned long, so by my reading it's ill-formed because (1<<31) has type int and is negative so requires a narrowing con

[Bug c++/53745] Bitshifted value (1 << 31) within enumerator class is calculated incorrectly during compilation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/53745] New: Bitshifted value (1 << 31) within enumerator class is calculated incorrectly during compilation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53745 Bug #: 53745 Summary: Bitshifted value (1 << 31) within enumerator class is calculated incorrectly during compilation. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53688] [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-21 12:50:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > > I rechecked there is no regression without static on Sundy Bridge nor Atom. Great. Please verify that -static isn't used on eembc and SPEC CPU 2000/2006 run

[Bug fortran/53732] [4.7/4.8 Regression] "mismatching comparison operand types" on compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2012-06-21 12:48:51 UTC --- Created attachment 27686 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27686 "shot in the dark" patch[*] [*] Carefully crafted with love and patience, using the ancestral methods

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #19 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-06-21 12:46:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I've tried without static. Runtimes is still the same. > > It doesn't match what I saw. On Atom D510: > > /export/gnu/

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 --- Comment #5 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 12:24:38 UTC --- Yes, that's where it happens. Your proposal makes sense; I've just been trying to avoid changing existing behavior on "normal" platforms. I'll give the unconditional solution a try

[Bug middle-end/53688] [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2012-06-21 12:18:31 UTC --- Author: matz Date: Thu Jun 21 12:18:23 2012 New Revision: 188852 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188852 Log: PR middle-end/53688 * builtins.c (get_memory_

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-21 12:12:24 UTC --- On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, bigotp at acm dot org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 > > --- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 > 12:04:34 UTC --

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 --- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 12:04:34 UTC --- commit af66de00843896ad5d2980952994b31cadbf8421 Author: Peter A. Bigot Date: Thu Jun 21 06:35:44 2012 -0500 Anticipatory patch for PR middle-end/38756 Do not truncate to

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21 12:01:14 UTC --- I can't see where you would place this change from looking at the function.

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 Peter A. Bigot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bigotp at acm dot org --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #9 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 10:07:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Surely not using -freorder-blocks-and-partition will fix this? Yes, it fixes. >The actual > bug should not be LTO or PGO related. Without profile d

[Bug gcov-profile/53744] New: gcov version oscillates between 407* and 407p on branches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53744 Bug #: 53744 Summary: gcov version oscillates between 407* and 407p on branches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21 09:47:20 UTC --- Confirmed on input1 with > /space/rguenther/install/gcc-4.7.1/bin/g++ -c t.ii > -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fno-exceptions -std=gnu++0x -fprofile-use > -fprofile-correction

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-21 09:35:16 UTC --- Surely not using -freorder-blocks-and-partition will fix this? The actual bug should not be LTO or PGO related.

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #7 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:27:46 UTC --- I have two ld: GNU and GOLD. Problem appears before ld call, but with such gcc keys ld GOLD must be called. It version is GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.22.0.20120323) 1.11.

[Bug libitm/53113] Build fails in x86_avx.cc if AVX disabled but supported by as (Solaris & Linux)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113 --- Comment #4 from Martin 2012-06-21 09:25:21 UTC --- ( And the "different story" is bug 53731... http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731 )

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #5 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:23:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27685 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27685 full gcc -v output for source 2

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #6 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:22:36 UTC --- GNU assembler version 2.22.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU Binutils) 2.22.0.20120323

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #4 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:21:16 UTC --- Created attachment 27684 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27684 Profile data 2

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #3 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:19:51 UTC --- Created attachment 27683 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27683 Preprocessed source 2

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #2 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:17:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27682 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27682 full gcc -v output

[Bug c++/53743] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 --- Comment #1 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:15:54 UTC --- Created attachment 27681 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27681 Profile data 1

[Bug c++/53743] New: ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53743 Bug #: 53743 Summary: ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-21 09:12:50 UTC --- What version of binutils are you using? Also are you using gold or GNU ld?

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #4 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:07:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27679 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27679 Assembler output that rejected by as

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #3 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:05:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27678 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27678 Full c++ console output

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #2 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:04:20 UTC --- Created attachment 27677 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27677 Profile data

[Bug other/53742] bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 --- Comment #1 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 09:03:45 UTC --- Created attachment 27676 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27676 Preprocessed source

[Bug other/53742] New: bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53742 Bug #: 53742 Summary: bad assembler output when compiling with LTO and PGO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53741] New: ICE on lambda calling static template member function with explicit template argument specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53741 Bug #: 53741 Summary: ICE on lambda calling static template member function with explicit template argument specification Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-21 08:46:11 UTC --- On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 > > --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-20 15:36:09 > UTC --

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::function::function(std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-21 08:23:56 UTC --- *** Bug 53713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/53713] undefined reference with -brtl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53713 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-06-21 07:33:34 UTC --- Patch that fixes all valgrind issues, but I have no idea if it is OK or not: --cut here-- Index: var-tracking.c === ---

[Bug c++/53727] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO (not OOM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727 --- Comment #9 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:29:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27674 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27674 Profile data from comment 7

[Bug c++/53727] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO (not OOM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727 --- Comment #8 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:28:16 UTC --- Created attachment 27673 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27673 Preprocessed source from comment 7

[Bug c++/53727] ICE when compiling firefox with PGO and LTO (not OOM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53727 --- Comment #7 from ioctl at yandex dot ru 2012-06-21 07:25:46 UTC --- The same problem with other file from ff 12: LANG=C c++ -o nsPluginHost.o -c -fPIC -fno-rtti -march=prescott -mtune=prescott -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -msse3 -O2 -fstack-protector --