http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
--- Comment #3 from Petr.Salinger at seznam dot cz 2012-07-16 07:28:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 27801
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27801
another testcase - from xorg mouse driver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
Bug #: 53977
Summary: CPP: Support __func__/__FUNCTION__
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-16
08:14:15 UTC ---
A quick test of other Fortran compilers shows that this is not a widely
supported feature - none of the tried compilers supports it. In C, it falls
semantically into the preprocessor,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53956
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16 08:45:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ... and therefore an
> alternative (and probably preferable) patch would be:
The patch in comment #3 generates the correct if_source for "c2", but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #19 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-16
09:36:11 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Jul 16 09:36:04 2012
New Revision: 189512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189512
Log:
Backport from trunk:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53970
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
09:42:18 UTC ---
In file included from jni/../../../source/Irrlicht/CImage.cpp:8:
also please provide pre-processed source of CImage.cpp. See
gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53959
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53953
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
09:54:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> When a DSO is created from this code with `-std=c++11', `-lfto' and
> `-Wl,--export-dynamic' options, it requires the definition of
> `std::allocator_trait
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
--- Comment #4 from zhangbin 2012-07-16
09:56:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27802
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27802
the C file
Please see the attach CImage.cpp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53978
Bug #: 53978
Summary: Missing static const definitions in
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53978
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
09:58:57 UTC ---
I've created PR 53978 for the libstdc++ fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53956
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16 10:13:26 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jul 16 10:13:19 2012
New Revision: 189514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189514
Log:
2012-07-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53956
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53979
Bug #: 53979
Summary: (a^b^b) not simplified to (a) (in combination with
CSE??)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53895
Marc Dietrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marvin24 at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-07-16
11:54:23 UTC ---
The following patch fixes this issue during expansion, don't have time right
now to test what effects it might have on generated code though:
--- gcc/function.c.jj2012-06-25 08:38:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53980
Bug #: 53980
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap fails in stage 1:
i386.md:17784:3: error: 'OPTION_BIONIC' undeclared
here (not in a function) in build/gencondmd.c
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53980
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Component|bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
12:34:40 UTC ---
Please attach _preprocessed_ source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53959
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16
12:35:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jul 16 12:35:10 2012
New Revision: 189528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189528
Log:
Restore type attribute comparison
PR mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16
12:35:18 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jul 16 12:35:10 2012
New Revision: 189528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189528
Log:
Restore type attribute comparison
PR mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32378
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32375
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
13:03:10 UTC ---
The issue is that we have
:
# j_2 = PHI <2(4), j_30(10)>
pretmp.38_71 = (integer(kind=8)) j_2;
pretmp.38_72 = stride.2_6 * pretmp.38_71;
pretmp.38_73 = offset.3_8 + pretmp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33711
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966
--- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-07-16
13:15:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Yes, right, "-O2 -finline-functions" broken too.
"-O3 -fno-inline-functions" - broken;
"-O3 -fno-inline-functions -fno-ipa-cp-clone" - good.
-fno-strict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53981
Bug #: 53981
Summary: gcc.dg/20020201-1.c fails with Android NDK
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53980
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #8 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-16 14:16:46 UTC
---
I used -march=native in this case. It is interesting that this enabled AVX
(this particular CPU does support it).
To be clear, the problem also occurs with
-m64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
Bug #: 53982
Summary: gij built for x32 can't run a simple Hello World class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53983
Bug #: 53983
Summary: Cross arm-none-eabi armv6-m need a fake Makefile to
compile libgcc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53970
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
14:53:21 UTC ---
The only hint we have on the a->l[i] expression that it involves a packed
aggregate is DECL_ALIGN of the 'l' FIELD_DECL and TYPE_ALIGN of mystruct
itself. Nowhere we have a TYPE/DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
14:56:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I used -march=native in this case. It is interesting that this enabled AVX
> (this particular CPU does support it).
>
> To be clear, the problem also oc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #10 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-16 15:35:03
UTC ---
This particular application test was done with these options (i.e. -O2):
-m64 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -mfpmath=387 -O2
I have also tried -O3, with no posit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #11 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-16 15:41:08
UTC ---
I just verified that -O3 produces similar timings to -O2 for both -mfpmath=387
and -mfpmath=sse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Schepler 2012-07-16
15:53:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please show us how to reproduce it.
I assume you mean the heap corruption issue in ecj1? To pick a Debian package
at random which is running into this...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Schepler 2012-07-16
16:04:47 UTC ---
Update on comment #2:
Running through the java files one at a time, I found that just
gcj -C -Wall org/jpedal/jbig2/examples/viewer/NavigationToolbar.java
fails by itself. The firs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
Bug #: 53984
Summary: iostream operation throwing exception when exceptions
not enabled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
--- Comment #1 from Pete Chapman
2012-07-16 17:00:10 UTC ---
Even simpler:
---
#include
int main()
{
std::ifstream in(".");
int x;
if (in)
in >> x;
}
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Rainer Emrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] bootstrap |[4.7/4.8 Regression]
|f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich 2012-07-16
17:17:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 27804
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27804
Errors in stage 2
These are the errors I get in stage 2 for gcc-4.8.0.
How to proceed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.x/3.2.x |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53985
Bug #: 53985
Summary: -Wno-c-binding-type still prints a warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2012-07-16 19:03:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Fixed the component)
>
> I can't reproduce this.
> I can print wordMapBitset before it is initialized but
> I get a different error:
>
> (gdb) p wordBitset
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
19:14:26 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 19:14:18 2012
New Revision: 189545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189545
Log:
PR c++/53919
* doc/install.texi (Installi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-16
19:38:33 UTC ---
Untested patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c
@@ -725,3 +729,3 @@ syntax:
static match
-match_char_length (gfc_expr **expr, bool *deferred)
+match_char_length (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-16
20:23:20 UTC ---
The problem seems to be that PARM_DECLs are not marked as REG_USERVAR_P.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53978
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
20:43:16 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 20:43:11 2012
New Revision: 189547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189547
Log:
PR libstdc++/53978
* include/bits/alloc_tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53978
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
20:47:45 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 20:47:40 2012
New Revision: 189548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189548
Log:
PR libstdc++/53978
* include/bits/alloc_tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53978
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-16 20:50:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I guess that the better default would be -mno-ieee for bare metals
Hm ... Is there a particular reason to distinguish between linux and non-linux?
I was actua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53954
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
20:55:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Note also that the above reproducer originally comes from a likely C++ code
> using `std::vector' and `-std=c++11' option, like the following;
>
> ///
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
Bug #: 53986
Summary: missing vrp on bit-mask test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-07-16
20:58:08 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Jul 16 20:58:04 2012
New Revision: 189549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189549
Log:
2012-07-16 Thomas König
PR fortran/53824
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53973
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53975
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jermar 2012-07-16 21:25:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 27805
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27805
Reproducible testcase
Here is a trimmed down reproducible testcase which exhibits the problem. The
ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|redi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #34 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
21:57:25 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 21:57:18 2012
New Revision: 189553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189553
Log:
PR libstdc++/53270
* include/ext/concurre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53948
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-16
21:57:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27806
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27806
Proposed fix: Distinguish between a user variable and a function argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-07-16
22:15:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Thus, I did not want to distinguish between linux or non-linux here.
I have no strong feelings about the bare metal case.
We didn't catch any complaints f
work||4.6.4, 4.7.2
Known to fail||
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-16
22:24:11 UTC ---
I've tried to reproduce the issue with rev 189549 (GCC 4.8),
GCC 4.7.2 20120711 (prerelease) and GCC 4.6.4 20120716 (prerelease).
It seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-16
22:34:17 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jul 16 22:34:13 2012
New Revision: 189555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189555
Log:
PR libstdc++/53270
* include/ext/concurre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.2
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987
Bug #: 53987
Summary: [SH] Unnecessary zero-extension before cmp/eq
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
Bug #: 53988
Summary: [SH] tst Rm,Rn not used for QI/HImode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53989
Bug #: 53989
Summary: Internal compiler error in strip_typedefs, at
cp/tree.c:1187
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53990
Bug #: 53990
Summary: wrong "optimisation": automatic variable doesn't
removed at fuction exit
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53989
Scott Howlett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Internal compiler error in |[4.6/4.7 regression]
|s
84 matches
Mail list logo
