http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54171
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54171
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-04
05:33:31 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Aug 4 05:33:27 2012
New Revision: 190140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190140
Log:
Replace top_srcdir with srcdir
PR drive
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54171
Bug #: 54171
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Installed GCC doesn't work
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53865
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54170
Bug #: 54170
Summary: Call to lambda elided
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54169
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54169
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-08-03
20:51:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 27934
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27934
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54169
Bug #: 54169
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:3162
-- bad stack alignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #23 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-08-03
19:45:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Revision 180701 removed all checks for special files in
> unit.c:unit_truncate().
Yes. As the email message introducing the patch explained, special fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
--- Comment #7 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-08-03
19:24:40 UTC ---
There are no those fails now, thanks! The bug could be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54165
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
--- Comment #1 from Mans Rullgard 2012-08-03 17:15:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 27933
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27933
Compiled test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
Bug #: 54168
Summary: ARM: Redundant instructions emitted at -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03
16:14:05 UTC ---
Yukhin, could you please verify this removes the failure for your target?
Thanks,
Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03
16:12:34 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Aug 3 16:12:22 2012
New Revision: 190131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190131
Log:
2012-08-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-03
16:12:34 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Aug 3 16:12:22 2012
New Revision: 190131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190131
Log:
2012-08-03 Bill Schmidt
PR target/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54166
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-03
16:03:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> You should run the compiler under Valgrind and see whether it complains.
I now configured with --enable-checking=valgrind
Valgrind is 3.3.1
GCC is 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54166
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-03
16:00:59 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Aug 3 16:00:50 2012
New Revision: 190130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190130
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54166
* trans-array.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54165
Ed Catmur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed at catmur dot co.uk
--- Comment #1 from Ed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54167
Bug #: 54167
Summary: excessive alignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #15 from Michael Matz 2012-08-03 14:43:14
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Aug 3 14:43:09 2012
New Revision: 190126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190126
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54146
* cfgexpand.c (ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54161
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-03 14:19:58
UTC ---
Makes sense to me.
Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51631
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54166
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54156
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-08-03
13:38:05 UTC ---
There are 6 "* 10" in a dump for AVX (additional 2 occur when vectorizer
consider 32-byte vectorization)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54166
Bug #: 54166
Summary: ICE rank-1 assignment to rank-2 array section
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
--- Comment #23 from Marc Glisse 2012-08-03
12:35:40 UTC ---
I think that's it for me. Should we close the bug, or is there still something
missing?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51631
Terry Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
--- Comment #22 from Marc Glisse 2012-08-03
12:21:25 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri Aug 3 12:21:14 2012
New Revision: 190125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190125
Log:
gcc/
2012-08-03 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimizat
Once in awhile I come across a company that I really love. I wanted to pass
this on to you because I know you would be interested. This company will
pay you $425 every month to put a small ad on your car. I signed up and now
I am advertising a Salon. The extra $425 every month has really helped me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54165
Bug #: 54165
Summary: Cast to "void" should not implicitly call conversion
functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33591
Tomash Brechko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomash.brechko at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54164
Bug #: 54164
Summary: C++11: confusion error messages for spurious
"typename"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||darwin*
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-03
08:59:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 27930
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27930
Do not inline_merge_summary if called via flatten_function
As I noted in comment #12, the flatten
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54150
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-03
08:42:02 UTC ---
The excessive newline is gone! Nice. Unfortunately tree dumps, like
-fdump-tree-pre still show TDF_BLOCKS info by default and there is no
-fdump-tree-pre-no-blocks. I'd like to h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54150
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-03
08:22:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 27929
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27929
Adjust pp_flush as per suggestion of comment #1, and honor ~TDF_BLOCKS
Could the OP please give th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54158
--- Comment #7 from Ai Azuma 2012-08-03 08:21:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Right
O.K. Then, this behavior makes sense. Thanks for the clarification!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54162
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54160
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54158
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-03
07:57:28 UTC ---
Right
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54163
Bug #: 54163
Summary: Ignore -l[lib] option on PCH generation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prior
47 matches
Mail list logo