[Bug target/52495] rs6000.c fails to (cross-) build: "implicit declaration of function ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52495 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-17 01:13:29 UTC --- I also run into this. The bug is in rs6000.h: #ifdef HAVE_GAS_WEAK #define RS6000_WEAK 1 #else #define RS6000_WEAK 0 #endif #if RS6000_WEAK /* Used in lieu of ASM_WEAKEN_LABEL. */ #defin

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-17 00:18:42 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Fri Aug 17 00:18:35 2012 New Revision: 190463 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190463 Log: PR middle-end/54261 * optabs.c (expand_at

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-17 00:03:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > I disagree: > I know enough to use strcat and strcpy. That's provably false. > 1: Why those functions work false and are dependent on variables(! I na

[Bug rtl-optimization/54294] [4.8 Regression]: [alpha] Bootstrap comparison failure due to fwprop handling of debug insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54294 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/54294] [4.8 Regression]: [alpha] Bootstrap comparison failure due to fwprop handling of debug insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54294 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-08-16 23:23:39 UTC --- Created attachment 28040 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28040 Preprocessed source of the object file that triggers comparison failure ~/gcc-build/stage1-gcc/xgcc -B

[Bug rtl-optimization/54294] New: [4.8 Regression]: [alpha] Bootstrap comparison failure due to fwprop handling of debug insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54294 Bug #: 54294 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: [alpha] Bootstrap comparison failure due to fwprop handling of debug insns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/54236] [SH] Improve addc and subc insn utilization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-16 23:19:51 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 16 23:19:45 2012 New Revision: 190459 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190459 Log: PR target/54236 * config/sh/sh.md (addc): Ad

[Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #32 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-16 23:16:57 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 16 23:16:53 2012 New Revision: 190458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190458 Log: PR target/39423 * config/sh/sh.md (*movsi_i

[Bug target/52495] rs6000.c fails to (cross-) build: "implicit declaration of function ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52495 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-16 23:13:18 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Aug 16 23:13:11 2012 New Revision: 190457 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190457 Log: PR target/54089 * config/sh/sh.md (ashlsi3_

[Bug c++/54293] When a reference is bound to subobject of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28020|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54293] When a reference is bound to subobject of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-16 23:02:07 UTC --- I think this is a dup of bug 54197 or at least related to it.

[Bug target/53487] [4.8 Regression] Unrecognizable insn for conditional move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53487 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52775] Change default for using FCFID instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52775 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #7 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 22:38:19 UTC --- *** Bug 54213 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/54213] please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54213 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Denis Kole

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/54293] New: When a reference is bound to subobject of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293 Bug #: 54293 Summary: When a reference is bound to subobject of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2012-08-16 22:26:11 UTC --- *** Bug 54291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/54005] Use __atomic_always_lock_free in libstdc++ is_lock_free instead of __atomic_is_lock_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-16 22:23:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Actually, that's the way __atomic_is_lock_free() has always been implemented > (even in 4.7). There's miscommunication here. The point of this PR

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 --- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-08-16 22:18:36 UTC --- A candidate patch was sent to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg0.html.

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-16 22:05:37 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Aug 16 22:05:32 2012 New Revision: 190455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190455 Log: PR middle-end/54261 * gcc.dg/torture/pr54

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-16 22:03:39 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Aug 16 22:03:33 2012 New Revision: 190454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190454 Log: PR middle-end/54261 * optabs.c (expand_at

[Bug bootstrap/54292] [4.8 Regression] Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|Errors due to co

[Bug bootstrap/54292] Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Schlüter 2012-08-16 21:49:53 UTC --- Created attachment 28038 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28038 configure log

[Bug bootstrap/54292] New: Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 Bug #: 54292 Summary: Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #6 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 21:18:32 UTC --- I know it could be because if accounts values are changed they are sorted in reverse order(last changed), but my SQL request requests in strict order and my program even not changes t

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Denis Kolesnik changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28034|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #4 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 21:11:38 UTC --- Created attachment 28036 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28036 assembler source file

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #3 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 21:09:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28035 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28035 object file to the source

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #2 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 21:06:51 UTC --- to THE source

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #1 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-16 21:04:28 UTC --- Created attachment 28034 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28034 additional files to source asked

[Bug c++/54291] New: why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Bug #: 54291 Summary: why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54285] [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 20:33:22 UTC --- The following patch fixes the error message in comment 0: Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c === --- gcc/fortran/pr

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry 2012-08-16 19:55:57 UTC --- C standard: The header defines the macro setjmp, and declares one function and one type, for bypassing the normal function call and return discipline. OK. I agree with you. But one moment.

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler 2012-08-16 19:54:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think standard of C std libs declares setjmp as a function. So, it should be > function. I'm not looking at any code, but C says: "The header defines t

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-16 19:51:54 UTC --- Nothing changes, because the C++ standard says that macros which can be implemented as functions in C must be actual macros in C++ (and setjmp is *explicitly* mentioned)

[Bug target/54290] gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290 --- Comment #1 from Erik Volk 2012-08-16 19:51:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28032 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28032 preprocessed test case

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry 2012-08-16 19:49:27 UTC --- I think standard of C std libs declares setjmp as a function. So, it should be function. Some code: __BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag jmp_buf[1]; extern int setjmp (jmp_bu

[Bug target/54290] New: gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290 Bug #: 54290 Summary: gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler 2012-08-16 19:46:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry, but I think standard declares that all function should be in std. No. 17.6.1.2 [headers] only says so for non-macros: "In the C++ standard library,

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry 2012-08-16 19:43:15 UTC --- Sorry, but I think standard declares that all function should be in std.

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler 2012-08-16 19:38:16 UTC --- The problem seems still to exist in gcc 4.8.0 20120729 (experimental). Just to be sure that this is not due to a badly formed error description I tested to compile the folowing code

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 --- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-08-16 19:11:01 UTC --- > I think it's valid, CC'ing Dodji for confirmation. I agree this is a bug. I am looking into it.

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned a

[Bug c++/54197] [4.7/4.8 regression] Lifetime of reference not properly extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54197 --- Comment #4 from Ollie Wild 2012-08-16 18:46:42 UTC --- Fix submitted to the google/gcc-4_7 branch. Still waiting on maintainer approval for the trunk and gcc-4_7-branches.

[Bug c++/54197] [4.7/4.8 regression] Lifetime of reference not properly extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54197 --- Comment #3 from Ollie Wild 2012-08-16 18:44:01 UTC --- Author: aaw Date: Thu Aug 16 18:43:52 2012 New Revision: 190450 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190450 Log: Fix some cases where lifetimes of temporaries bound to e

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #9 from Diego Novillo 2012-08-16 18:42:48 UTC --- New proposed patch. Needs testing with a 4.1 compiler. I couldn't build my own (fails to build). http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01090.html

[Bug libstdc++/54289] New: setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Bug #: 54289 Summary: setjmp isn't included into std namespace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo 2012-08-16 18:24:30 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Thu Aug 16 18:24:22 2012 New Revision: 190449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190449 Log: 2012-08-16 Diego Novillo Revert PR

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Diego Novillo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54288] Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54288] New: Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Bug #: 54288 Summary: Wrong sign compiled at run-time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c/54282] GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54282 Jordi Guillaumes Pons changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54287] New: -finstrument-functions-exclude-function-list ignores class/namespace scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54287 Bug #: 54287 Summary: -finstrument-functions-exclude-function-list ignores class/namespace scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCO

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-16 15:29:24 UTC --- Maybe related that we don't build a "host" libstdc++-v3 but only a target one: target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3; bootstrap=true; lib_pa

[Bug fortran/54286] New: [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Bug #: 54286 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-16 14:58:53 UTC --- I'll see what I can do.

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-16 14:45:03 UTC --- I see. Jonathan, I guess a reduced testcase not including anything would be very useful anyway (even if the ICE is very old)

[Bug fortran/54285] New: [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285 Bug #: 54285 Summary: [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #52 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-16 14:27:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 16 14:27:51 2012 New Revision: 190445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190445 Log: 2012-08-16 Richard Guenther PR middle

[Bug target/54284] New: -mabi=ieeelongdouble problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54284 Bug #: 54284 Summary: -mabi=ieeelongdouble problems Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-16 14:06:06 UTC --- On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 > > --- Comment #50 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com com> 2

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #50 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 13:55:40 UTC --- On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:10 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > bitmap stats are confusing because they show leaks for bitmaps we free > by releasing their obstack

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2012-08-16 13:53:37 UTC --- Created attachment 28030 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28030 hacky patch

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-16 13:46:24 UTC --- It was triggered by revision 176549: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00816.html But ICE is always there.

[Bug bootstrap/54283] New: [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Bug #: 54283 Summary: [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Diego Novillo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #5 from Diego Novillo 2012-08-16 13:28:27 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Thu Aug 16 13:28:13 2012 New Revision: 190444 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190444 Log: 2012-08-16 Diego Novillo PR bootstrap/54

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-08-16 13:00:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > How about small variation: Sounds reasonable to me.

[Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966 --- Comment #12 from Tom Tignor 2012-08-16 12:59:39 UTC --- Hi Jakub, Can you tell me what gcc version has the fix? Read through 48306 and saw "Fixed in 4.5+" but I have a colleague here who is able to reproduce on 4.5.1. Tom:-) From:

[Bug c/54282] New: GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54282 Bug #: 54282 Summary: GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status:

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-16 12:43:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > For linux environment, libc's abort function is a rather complex > function and trapa handler should do equivalent things to keep >

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog --- Comment #49 from Richar

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #4 from Diego Novillo 2012-08-16 12:04:59 UTC --- Tentative fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01046.html Don't have an old enough compiler to test it myself. Need help with testing.

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-08-16 11:23:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) For linux environment, libc's abort function is a rather complex function and trapa handler should do equivalent things to keep complete binary compatibilit

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-16 11:22:06 UTC --- Fails with a 4.1 host libstdc++, succeeds with a 4.6 host libstdc++.

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-16 11:18:42 UTC --- Another fix is to include all system headers (and thus gmp.h) from system.h which always comes before includes of intl.h.

[Bug target/54252] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad alignment code generated for Neon loads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2 Summary|[4.7 Regressi

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug middle-end/54224] [4.8 Regression] Bogus -Wunused-function warning with static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54153] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark IDEA 6% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54153 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/54144] [4.6 Regression] With -std=c++0x certain incorrect arguments to map.insert cause gcc crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug other/53923] [4.8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/53876] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with class array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre O

[Bug middle-end/53062] [4.8 Regression] 445.gobmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53062 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/53343] [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' breaks bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with "." as the first component of $PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

  1   2   >