[Bug c/54486] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 Marek Polacek polacek at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at

[Bug bootstrap/54484] r190927 breaks bootstrap with clang compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 06:12:20 UTC --- Diego, did you also take a look at the warning about lessthan_ in the clang messages?

[Bug c/54486] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/54486] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] New: [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 Bug #: 54487 Summary: [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/54486] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end

[Bug c++/54485] g++ should diagnose default arguments in out-of-line definitions for template class member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485 Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target

[Bug c++/43122] g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types (__m128, __m128d)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122 SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nenakhov.sergey

[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/46843] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2157 -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46843 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/46829] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2105 with -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure and variadic function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug regression/53964] regression: sparc64 FreeBSD: /usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/./prev-gcc/include/stddef.h:150:26: error: two or more data types n declaration specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964 --- Comment #6 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-09-05 08:44:00 UTC --- on 4.7 the error is slightly different: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc47/work/build/libcpp'

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 08:48:00 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 5 08:47:50 2012 New Revision: 190967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190967 Log: PR target/54461 *

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tejohnson at

[Bug c++/54485] g++ should diagnose default arguments in out-of-line definitions for template class member functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54485 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54481] missed optimization: unnecessary indirect call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54481 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/54000] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Performance breakdown for gcc-4.{6,7} vs. gcc-4.5 using std::vector in matrix vector multiplication

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54000 --- Comment #6 from Benedict Geihe benedict.geihe at ins dot uni-bonn.de 2012-09-05 09:30:05 UTC --- I originally reported that using a C array instead of STL's vector solves the problem. I am afraid that was wrong. I can also not remember what

[Bug c++/43122] g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types (__m128, __m128d)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 09:32:11 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02098.html

[Bug tree-optimization/54000] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Performance breakdown for gcc-4.{6,7} vs. gcc-4.5 using std::vector in matrix vector multiplication

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54000 Benedict Geihe benedict.geihe at ins dot uni-bonn.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27816|0 |1

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-05 09:39:17 UTC --- Er, why should this test ever be run with the system compiler? libstdc++ should only ever be built by a newly built g++. The problem is not with

[Bug tree-optimization/54481] missed optimization: unnecessary indirect call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54481 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2012-09-05 09:42:27 UTC --- On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:30:04AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54481 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc

[Bug c++/43122] g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types (__m128, __m128d)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122 --- Comment #8 from SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 09:42:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg02098.html That's nice, but I would really prefer to define my own comparison

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-05 09:45:08 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00025.html clock ticking;-(

[Bug c++/54191] [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54191 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:14:43 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 5 10:14:37 2012 New Revision: 190969 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190969 Log: /cp 2012-09-05

[Bug tree-optimization/54488] New: tree loop invariant motion uses an excessive amount of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488 Bug #: 54488 Summary: tree loop invariant motion uses an excessive amount of memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54463] -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when using -fexternal-blas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:21:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) This bug report should be closed. Combining -fexternal-blas and -fdefault-real-8 would add needless complexity to the compiler.

[Bug libstdc++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstreamchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar '

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-05 10:25:16 UTC --- I think we should identify when this changed and why. Then, we can certainly add the export (please send a regular patch to the library mailing list)

[Bug c++/54191] [C++11] SFINAE does not handle conversion to inaccessible base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54191 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54489] New: tree FRE uses an excessive amount of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54489 Bug #: 54489 Summary: tree FRE uses an excessive amount of memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: memory-hog

[Bug middle-end/36041] Speed up builtin_popcountll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041 José Salavert Torres jsalavert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #32 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:46:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) Er, why should this test ever be run with the system compiler? libstdc++ should only ever be built by a newly built g++.

[Bug target/45070] Miscompiled c++ class with packed attribute on ARM with -Os optimizations (Qt 4.6.2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070 --- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:50:00 UTC --- Author: amker Date: Wed Sep 5 10:49:56 2012 New Revision: 190970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190970 Log: Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline

[Bug target/45070] Miscompiled c++ class with packed attribute on ARM with -Os optimizations (Qt 4.6.2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070 --- Comment #23 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:54:11 UTC --- Author: amker Date: Wed Sep 5 10:54:08 2012 New Revision: 190971 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190971 Log: Backport from 2012-09-04 mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 --- Comment #36 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 10:59:52 UTC --- If I fix that (PR54489) by iterating over immediate dominators when querying AVAIL_OUT instead of accumulating then other loop opts quickly take over in

[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-09-05 11:12:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) This is invalid as per [class.static.data]/3 : On C++11 level it should be valid, because odr-usage does not happen

[Bug c++/54483] undefined reference to static constexpr in .so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54483 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another segmentation fault after an error in COMMON statement after r190853

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-05 11:46:24 UTC --- Indeed the patch in comment #1 fixes the PR without regression.

[Bug bootstrap/54484] r190927 breaks bootstrap with clang compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484 --- Comment #5 from dnovillo at google dot com dnovillo at google dot com 2012-09-05 11:48:38 UTC --- On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:12 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: did you also take a look at the warning about

[Bug other/54490] New: ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 Bug #: 54490 Summary: ICE: Spill failure in newlib build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra

[Bug other/54490] [4.7 Regression] ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/43122] g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types (__m128, __m128d)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 12:19:54 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Sep 5 12:19:47 2012 New Revision: 190973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190973 Log: Backport from 2012-09-05

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/43122] g++ does not allow overloading operators for sse types (__m128, __m128d)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43122 --- Comment #10 from SergeyN nenakhov.sergey at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 12:24:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Then put it into a class and add overloaded comparison operators for the wrapper class. That is the same thing as with

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #33 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-05 12:31:06 UTC --- Er, did you read comment #26? Do comments #24 and #25 answer this question? Jack says the configure test is being run with clang, which if true

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 12:40:49 UTC --- No, the #c24 and #c25 comments make no sense at all. In void f(void) { asm (rdrand %eax); } rdrand shouldn't be optimized out, at least not by gcc, asm in

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-05 12:59:09 UTC --- No, the #c24 and #c25 comments make no sense at all. My only claim is that they allow to bootstrap again my platform of choice. In void f(void) {

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54461] [avr] add configure option for better AVR-Libc integration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j at uriah dot

[Bug c/54491] New: interval membership optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491 Bug #: 54491 Summary: interval membership optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #36 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 13:25:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #35) What will happen if the assembly accept rdrand, but not the CPU? The code at runtime checks for the feature bit. There will

[Bug fortran/54474] [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_3.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 13:27:08 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Wed Sep 5 13:26:58 2012 New Revision: 190977 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190977 Log: 2012-09-05 Dominique

[Bug tree-optimization/54492] New: [4.8 Regression] SLSR takes ages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54492 Bug #: 54492 Summary: [4.8 Regression] SLSR takes ages Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 --- Comment #37 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 13:29:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 5 13:29:13 2012 New Revision: 190978 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190978 Log: 2012-09-05 Richard

[Bug middle-end/54493] New: -fguess-branch-probability takes ages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54493 Bug #: 54493 Summary: -fguess-branch-probability takes ages Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog

[Bug tree-optimization/54492] [4.8 Regression] SLSR takes ages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54492 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 13:30:55 UTC --- Use -fno-guess-branch-probability.

[Bug fortran/54474] [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_3.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54474 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54489] tree FRE uses an excessive amount of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54489 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 13:52:25 UTC --- Testcase: int foo (int a) { int b = 0; #define X if (a) b = b + 1; #define XX X X X X X X X X X X #define XXX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX #define

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 --- Comment #37 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 13:57:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) (though, apparently insufficient for i?86 - it should use either __get_cpuid, or __get_cpuid_max before __cpuid). I fixed

[Bug tree-optimization/54491] interval membership optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/54491] interval membership optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 14:54:50 UTC --- I'm suprised PR46309 doesn't handle this. Will look at it.

[Bug fortran/54463] -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when using -fexternal-blas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-09-05 14:56:36 UTC --- On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:21:53AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #5

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 --- Comment #13 from Joerg Wunsch j at uriah dot heep.sax.de 2012-09-05 15:08:27 UTC --- All this is fighting the symptoms though. My point (as outlined in comment #8: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718#c8 ) is: When operating as

[Bug tree-optimization/54491] interval membership optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/18747] template int i; accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18747 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54441] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Infinite loop with brace initializer on zero-length array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54441 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/36041] Speed up builtin_popcountll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36041 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |glisse at

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 15:41:18 UTC --- Also happens with revision 190982 on Fedora 18/x86-64. I configured GCC with --prefix=/usr/local --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-09-05 15:46:16 UTC --- Created attachment 28133 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28133 bad .gcda file I've attached a bad .gcda file. Please note that

[Bug bootstrap/54484] r190927 breaks bootstrap with clang compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-09-05 16:17:01 UTC --- I can reproduce it with only --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local

[Bug c++/54420] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in decl_mangling_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/54172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] __cxa_guard_acquire thread-safety issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/54486] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 16:28:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 5 16:27:55 2012 New Revision: 190986 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190986 Log: PR middle-end/54486

[Bug middle-end/54486] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 16:29:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Sep 5 16:29:42 2012 New Revision: 190987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190987 Log: PR middle-end/54486

[Bug bootstrap/54484] r190927 breaks bootstrap with clang compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484 --- Comment #7 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 16:34:54 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Wed Sep 5 16:34:42 2012 New Revision: 190988 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190988 Log: PR bootstrap/54484

[Bug bootstrap/54484] r190927 breaks bootstrap with clang compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54484 --- Comment #8 from dnovillo at google dot com dnovillo at google dot com 2012-09-05 16:38:21 UTC --- On 2012-09-05 12:11 , glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I meant the one in this PR's description. The second overload of lower_bound takes an

[Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another segmentation fault after an error in COMMON statement after r190853

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 16:40:56 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Sep 5 16:40:48 2012 New Revision: 190989 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190989 Log: 2012-09-05 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54462] [4.8 Regression] Another segmentation fault after an error in COMMON statement after r190853

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54462 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/54494] New: Missing store to volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54494 Bug #: 54494 Summary: Missing store to volatile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/54494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing store to volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54494 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/54491] interval membership optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 17:52:53 UTC --- integer overflow Note there is never any integer overflow with unsigned types but always wrapping.

[Bug tree-optimization/54494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing store to volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54494 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/54495] New: gcc gives a false warning in kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54495 Bug #: 54495 Summary: gcc gives a false warning in kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/54494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing store to volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54494 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 18:23:56 UTC --- Created attachment 28134 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28134 Patch which fixes the problem Here is the fix.

[Bug target/54496] New: [M32C] - Improve address costs estimations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54496 Bug #: 54496 Summary: [M32C] - Improve address costs estimations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #6 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-09-05 19:02:51 UTC --- I finally got a reproducer for the error that H.J. reported. I will work on fixing that first. Markus, I looked at the gcda file you sent but don't see

[Bug gcov-profile/54487] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken by r190952

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-09-05 19:20:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Markus, I looked at the gcda file you sent but don't see anything obviously wrong with it. gcov-dump reports that most

[Bug libstdc++/54296] using the object in the map to erase element from the map crashes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54296 --- Comment #9 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 19:41:21 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Wed Sep 5 19:41:16 2012 New Revision: 190991 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190991 Log: 2012-09-05 François

[Bug tree-optimization/54494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing store to volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54494 Ralf Baechle r...@linux-mips.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@linux-mips.org

[Bug other/54490] [4.7 Regression] ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug testsuite/54184] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot

[Bug other/54490] [4.7 Regression] ICE: Spill failure in newlib build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-05 21:24:40 UTC --- I see hundreds of spill fails riunning the test suite -- with AVR-Libc. Some months ago, 2 or 3 pathological test cases failes with spill fails. Now there

[Bug driver/28718] Call to -lgcc added prior to user libraries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28718 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last

[Bug c/51840] asm goto enhancement request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840 Timo Kreuzer timo.kreuzer at reactos dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/54497] New: Revision 190015 causes 22% degradation on 172.mgrid on PowerPC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497 Bug #: 54497 Summary: Revision 190015 causes 22% degradation on 172.mgrid on PowerPC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54498] New: incorrect code generation from g++ -O on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54498 Bug #: 54498 Summary: incorrect code generation from g++ -O on x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >