[Bug other/53313] Add warning levels

2012-09-30 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/54758] New: accessing gcc builtins from fortran

2012-09-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54758 Bug #: 54758 Summary: accessing gcc builtins from fortran Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 Splitting reg

2012-09-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|m68k-*-*|

[Bug middle-end/54759] New: [4.8 regression] segfault for gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c on Solaris

2012-09-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54759 Bug #: 54759 Summary: [4.8 regression] segfault for gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c on Solaris Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/50025] [DR 1288] C++0x initialization syntax doesn't work for class members of reference type

2012-09-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28188|0 |1 is

[Bug libstdc++/54577] dequeT::erase() still takes iterator instead of const_iterator

2012-09-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 11:40:11 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Sep 30 11:40:06 2012 New Revision: 191866 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191866 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

2012-09-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #86 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-09-30 12:30:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #84) LTO might work for many codes, as using allocatables in derived types was not standard Fortran90 (IIRC)

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-30 12:36:38 UTC --- Created attachment 28302 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28302 include/c++/4.8.0/cmath for darwin

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

2012-09-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-30 13:14:25 UTC --- Simply, atan2 is C89, hypot is C99. Confirmed that we don't have to do anything special besides making sure that C99 functions like hypot

[Bug other/53313] Add warning levels

2012-09-30 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 14:19:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) include/c++/4.8.0/cmath for darwin Dominique, it would be more useful if you could show your libstdc++ config.log, and in

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-30 15:32:09 UTC --- Note that the last time I checked, on Leopard, darwin actually enabled _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1.

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-30 15:33:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) include/c++/4.8.0/cmath for darwin Dominique, it would be more useful if you could show your libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-09-30 15:37:29 UTC --- Note that the last time I checked, on Leopard, darwin actually enabled _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1. Well I may have been too quick to say

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-30 15:48:36 UTC --- Just confirmed that Snow Leopard is still Ok. As far as I'm concerned, the current status is good enough.

[Bug testsuite/54148] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/selfassign.c compilation

2012-09-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54148 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 15:52:35 UTC --- Tests don't fail with full bootstrap. It appears TESTING_IN_BUILD_TREE should not be output to site.exp when full build tree isn't available.

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 16:06:52 UTC --- On 30-Sep-12, at 10:19 AM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Dominique, it would be more useful if you could show your libstdc++ config.log, and in

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-30 16:16:25 UTC --- Hopeless ;)

[Bug fortran/54667] [OOP] gimplification failure with c_f_pointer

2012-09-30 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54667 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 16:36:09 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Sep 30 16:36:02 2012 New Revision: 191870 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191870 Log: 2012-09-30 Janus Weil

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/54667] [OOP] gimplification failure with c_f_pointer

2012-09-30 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54667 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/54760] New: [SH] Add __builtin_thread_pointer, __builtin_set_thread_pointer

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760 Bug #: 54760 Summary: [SH] Add __builtin_thread_pointer, __builtin_set_thread_pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/54760] [SH] Add __builtin_thread_pointer, __builtin_set_thread_pointer

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

2012-09-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 17:01:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) With the patch in comment #10, gfortran (otherwise clean r191847) miscompiles gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03. Seems to

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #14 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 17:15:24 UTC --- On 30-Sep-12, at 12:16 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: Hopeless ;) Actually, the situation might not be completely hopeless as the libquadmath

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-09-30 17:38:42 UTC --- I was joking, but I see many failures, not only for long double. Anyway, let's make sure we have a fall back, for now.

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

2012-09-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 17:41:55 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Sep 30 17:41:49 2012 New Revision: 191873 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191873 Log: PR

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

2012-09-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 17:44:09 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sun Sep 30 17:44:04 2012 New Revision: 191874 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191874 Log: PR

[Bug target/54686] std::abs (long long) resorts to std::abs (double) if llabs is absent

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54686 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28257|0 |1

[Bug go/54761] New: FAIL log

2012-09-30 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
gcc version 4.8.0 20120930 (experimental) [trunk revision 191866] (GCC)

[Bug target/54083] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr53922.c on *-apple-darwin*

2012-09-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54083 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 17:54:57 UTC --- Test is fixed on 32-bit hpux. Sorry, for messing up proposed patches.

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

2012-09-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28269|0 |1

[Bug libstdc++/54757] FAIL: ext/random/beta_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

2012-09-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54757 --- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-30 18:04:26 UTC --- I will commit the attached change if there are no objections. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug go/54761] FAIL log

2012-09-30 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54761 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-30 18:16:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28306 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28306 Gzipped test executable Gzipped alpha test executable, can be used

[Bug go/54761] FAIL log

2012-09-30 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54761 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-09-30 18:18:10 UTC --- Created attachment 28307 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28307 Output of readelf --debug

[Bug target/54686] std::abs (long long) resorts to std::abs (double) if llabs is absent

2012-09-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54686 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 18:45:56 UTC --- I've noticed that there seems to be a problem with register allocation related to shift insns. For example in the CSiBE set, I've seen sequences such as

[Bug middle-end/54759] [4.8 regression] segfault for gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c on Solaris

2012-09-30 Thread dehao at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54759 Dehao Chen dehao at google dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at

[Bug target/54762] New: [SH] Utilize zero-displacement branches for conditional far branches

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54762 Bug #: 54762 Summary: [SH] Utilize zero-displacement branches for conditional far branches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-30 Thread shart6 at utk dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #3 from Shane Hart shart6 at utk dot edu 2012-09-30 19:12:48 UTC --- The patch does get rid of memory corruption. However, there seem to be some problems with search_unit returning true if an exception is found when there is

[Bug rtl-optimization/38449] delay branch scheduling follows REG_CROSSING_JUMP jumps indiscriminately

2012-09-30 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38449 --- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 19:25:53 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Sun Sep 30 19:25:49 2012 New Revision: 191878 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191878 Log:

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-30 Thread tkoenig at netcologne dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #4 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2012-09-30 20:24:03 UTC --- Am 30.09.2012 21:12, schrieb shart6 at utk dot edu: If n_elist = 1, then high = low = 0, and the funtion will always return 0, even

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-30 Thread shart6 at utk dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #5 from Shane Hart shart6 at utk dot edu 2012-09-30 20:56:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Am 30.09.2012 21:12, schrieb shart6 at utk dot edu: If n_elist = 1, then high = low = 0, and the funtion will always return 0,

[Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 21:09:29 UTC --- Doing this... Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c === --- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(revision

[Bug middle-end/54759] [4.8 regression] segfault for gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c on Solaris

2012-09-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54759 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 21:22:35 UTC --- Thanks for reporting the bug. I prepared a patch to fix this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01997.html Could you help verify

[Bug middle-end/40205] OpenMP do loop with MAXINT gives wrong trip count

2012-09-30 Thread pkeir at outlook dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40205 --- Comment #3 from Paul Keir pkeir at outlook dot com 2012-09-30 21:29:22 UTC --- Still present in GFortran 4.7.2 on 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04.1.

[Bug c++/54763] New: Crash with enable_if (instead of recursive template errors)

2012-09-30 Thread pkeir at outlook dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54763 Bug #: 54763 Summary: Crash with enable_if (instead of recursive template errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/11708] [sh4-elf-gcc] Non-Optimal jump code generation.

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11708 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo

[Bug target/51708] SH Target: SHAD / SHLD constant not CSE-ed

2012-09-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51708 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-30 23:11:09 UTC --- In order to 'force' the constant load to be CSE-ed the constant load and dynamic shift patterns have to be emitted in the respective expanders, so that