http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-06 06:38:54 UTC ---
I see this issue with older gcc47 versions that predate the bump to 4.7.2 and
addition of --enable-libstdcxx-time, specifically:
$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
Bug #: 54831
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in vt_add_function_parameter, at
var-tracking.c:9412 with -O -fno-split-wide-types -g
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-06 07:57:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 28369
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28369
Testcase #2
Another (perhaps related) issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-10-06 07:58:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
CWG 1417 is now in ready state, which is a good opportunity to implement the
clarification. Meanwhile some traits (like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2012-10-06 08:02:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28370
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28370
Testcase #3
Undefined reference bug.
With gold:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-10-06 08:11:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I double-checked whether this might be related to
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1507
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-06
08:18:36 UTC ---
Excellent, thanks Daniel.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
Bug #: 54832
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Type-bound operator not picked
up with RESULT variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54833
Bug #: 54833
Summary: Don't wrap __builtin_free(a) in if (a != NULL)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834
Bug #: 54834
Summary: bootstrap fails when building libbacktrace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-08-06 07:54:57
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
Bug #: 54835
Summary: [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected
during copy-list-initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 11:20:18
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:20:11 2012
New Revision: 192155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192155
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
11:41:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28372
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28372
Candidate patch
Here's a patch which fixes one case of module contents not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
11:42:18 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:42:13 2012
New Revision: 192156
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192156
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eager at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:20:17 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 6 12:20:09 2012
New Revision: 192157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192157
Log:
2012-10-06 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:35:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Fortran 2008's 12.4.3.4.5 Restrictions on generic declarations has
Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
- one is a procedure and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-06 12:42:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
2012-10-06 Tobias Schlüter t...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/51727
* module.c (write_generic): Traverse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-06 12:46:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 28373
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28373
bad module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-06 12:47:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 28374
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28374
good module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-06 12:48:39 UTC ---
The main difference between 'good' and 'bad' seems to be the 'header' lines
bad:
()
(('arch_topology'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-06 12:52:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 28372 [details]
Candidate patch
actually... looking at the patch, don't you need to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
13:04:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 6 13:04:35 2012
New Revision: 192158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192158
Log:
2012-10-06 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bad optimization: sub |bad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
13:59:59 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 13:59:55 2012
New Revision: 192159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192159
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 14:03:14 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 6 14:03:08 2012
New Revision: 192160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192160
Log:
2012-10-06 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Enhanced argument checking: |[F95] Enhanced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 14:44:07 UTC ---
Slightly reworked example, which I hope is a bit easier to grasp:
program RecursiveInterface
call c(b2) ! b2's argument a2 has an integer argument,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
14:50:27 UTC ---
What you hit here is the V1 linker plugin API hack. We, for purpose, hide
COMDAT objects when we know we can hide them, because otherwise linker will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
15:07:58 UTC ---
Mainline -O3
Time spent in iteration: 11.0926
LTO (with today fix for resolution info)
Time spent in iteration: 10.9666
LTO with V1 API hack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
15:30:12 UTC ---
Also note that binutils has default search path for plugin. If we installed our
linker plugin there, the ugly gcc-nm/gcc-ar wrappers would not be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
Bug #: 54836
Summary: checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is
working... no
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
Daniel Santos daniel.santos at pobox dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bad optimization: sub |bad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Santos daniel.santos at pobox dot com 2012-10-06
15:57:15 UTC ---
Please help me out here if I am missing something.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-06
16:01:14 UTC ---
It looks like a duplicate of pr45277, i.e., at least one of your GMP, MPFR, or
MPC libraries has a problem (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-06 16:06:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Also note that binutils has default search path for plugin. If we installed
our
linker plugin there, the ugly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 16:19:43 UTC ---
Author: dehao
Date: Sat Oct 6 16:19:34 2012
New Revision: 192165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192165
Log:
2012-10-05 Dehao Chen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-06 16:20:57
UTC ---
There is also H.J.'s proposal to add automatic plugin support, or
mine to add an environment variable. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-06
17:00:17 UTC ---
Interestingly Macports' libgomp shows the same expected emutls related symbols
as fink...
% nm libgomp.1.dylib | grep emutls
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 17:25:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
I don't see the file gcc.dg/lto/resolutions_0.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837
Bug #: 54837
Summary: [4.8 Regression] lto bootstrap error: ICE in
expand_debug_source_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3538
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-06
17:26:51 UTC ---
I believe your no-runtime-stubs.patch used during the initial build of
libstdc++ is at fault...
--- gcc/config/darwin.h.orig2012-09-13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 17:30:42 2012
New Revision: 192166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192166
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 17:30:42 2012
New Revision: 192166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192166
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-10-06 17:43:29 UTC
---
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
I don't see the file gcc.dg/lto/resolutions_0.c.
Fixed now, thanks!
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #16 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-06 17:47:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Interestingly Macports' libgomp shows the same expected emutls related symbols
as fink...
% nm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06
17:53:45 UTC ---
configure:14187:
/Users/lizhou/Downloads/gcc-4.4.7/host-x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/gcc/gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Bug #: 54838
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in merge_latch_edges, at
cfgloop.c:678 with -O2 -ftracer -fno-tree-dce
-fno-tree-sra
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-06
19:26:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
These changes will certainly keep config.h in the libstdc++-v3 build
directory
from having...
#define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-06 19:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
These changes will certainly keep config.h in the libstdc++-v3 build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-06
20:56:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Note that the libgcc_ext.10.[45] are not actually needed if we're going to be
using the libgcc runtime. This is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-06
21:06:45 UTC ---
Also, you might want to look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888 which shows the thought
process and issues that arose during
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #21 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-06 21:14:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
Note that the libgcc_ext.10.[45] are not actually needed if we're going to
be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-06 21:15:02 UTC ---
In any event, this is a MacPorts bug for which I have a fix. This upstream bug
should be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 21:49:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Here is a draft patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54839
Bug #: 54839
Summary: INTEGER_CST is missed by uniuqify_nodes and soaks tons
of memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 22:44:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 6 22:44:12 2012
New Revision: 192173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192173
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54840
Bug #: 54840
Summary: ieee_arithmetic intrinsic module
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #6 from daniel.c.klauer at web dot de 2012-10-06 23:02:22 UTC ---
Using the ms_struct attribute instead of compiling with -mms-bitfields
reproduces the packing issue, while using the gcc_struct attribute prevents the
issue from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 23:06:09 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 6 23:06:04 2012
New Revision: 192174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192174
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54841
Bug #: 54841
Summary: Bad optimization on stack fill before call on ARM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54840
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andy.nelson at lanl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54842
Bug #: 54842
Summary: checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is
working... no
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54842
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
81 matches
Mail list logo
