http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54842
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54842
Bug #: 54842
Summary: checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is
working... no
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andy.nelson at lanl dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54840
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54841
Bug #: 54841
Summary: Bad optimization on stack fill before call on ARM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgf at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 23:06:09 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 6 23:06:04 2012
New Revision: 192174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192174
Log:
2012-10-06 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #6 from daniel.c.klauer at web dot de 2012-10-06 23:02:22 UTC ---
Using the ms_struct attribute instead of compiling with -mms-bitfields
reproduces the packing issue, while using the gcc_struct attribute prevents the
issue from s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54840
Bug #: 54840
Summary: ieee_arithmetic intrinsic module
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 22:44:23 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 6 22:44:12 2012
New Revision: 192173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192173
Log:
2012-10-06 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54839
Bug #: 54839
Summary: INTEGER_CST is missed by uniuqify_nodes and soaks tons
of memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 21:49:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Here is a draft patch:
... which regtests cleanly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-10-06 21:15:02 UTC ---
In any event, this is a MacPorts bug for which I have a fix. This upstream bug
should be closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #21 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-10-06 21:14:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > Note that the libgcc_ext.10.[45] are not actually needed if we're going to
> > be
> > using the libgcc r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06
21:06:45 UTC ---
Also, you might want to look at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888 which shows the thought
process and issues that arose during the libgcc_ext development.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06
20:56:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Note that the libgcc_ext.10.[45] are not actually needed if we're going to be
> using the libgcc runtime. This is the whole reason why I suggest jus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-10-06 19:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > > These changes will certainly keep config.h in the libstdc++-v3 build
> > > directory
> > > from having
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06
19:26:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> > These changes will certainly keep config.h in the libstdc++-v3 build
> > directory
> > from having...
> >
> > #define HAVE_TLS
>
> Why? Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Bug #: 54838
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in merge_latch_edges, at
cfgloop.c:678 with -O2 -ftracer -fno-tree-dce
-fno-tree-sra
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-06
17:53:45 UTC ---
configure:14187:
/Users/lizhou/Downloads/gcc-4.4.7/host-x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/gcc/gfortran
-B/Users/lizhou/Downloads/gcc-4.4.7/host-x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/gcc/
-B/Users/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #16 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
2012-10-06 17:47:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Interestingly Macports' libgomp shows the same expected emutls related symbols
> as fink...
>
> % nm libgomp.1.dylib | grep emutls
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06 17:43:29 UTC
---
> > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> I don't see the file gcc.dg/lto/resolutions_0.c.
Fixed now, thanks!
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 17:30:42 2012
New Revision: 192166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192166
Log:
PR lto/53831
PR lto/54776
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
17:30:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 17:30:42 2012
New Revision: 192166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192166
Log:
PR lto/53831
PR lto/54776
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06
17:26:51 UTC ---
I believe your no-runtime-stubs.patch used during the initial build of
libstdc++ is at fault...
--- gcc/config/darwin.h.orig2012-09-13 20:20:33.0 -0700
+++ gcc/co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837
Bug #: 54837
Summary: [4.8 Regression] lto bootstrap error: ICE in
expand_debug_source_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3538
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-06 17:25:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
I don't see the file gcc.dg/lto/resolutions_0.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06
17:00:17 UTC ---
Interestingly Macports' libgomp shows the same expected emutls related symbols
as fink...
% nm libgomp.1.dylib | grep emutls
U ___emutls_get_address
00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06 16:20:57
UTC ---
> There is also H.J.'s proposal to add automatic plugin support, or
> mine to add an environment variable. See:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00050.html
Interes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 16:19:43 UTC ---
Author: dehao
Date: Sat Oct 6 16:19:34 2012
New Revision: 192165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192165
Log:
2012-10-05 Dehao Chen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-06 16:06:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Also note that binutils has default search path for plugin. If we installed
> our
> linker plugin there, the ugly gcc-nm/gcc-ar wrappers woul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-06
16:01:14 UTC ---
It looks like a duplicate of pr45277, i.e., at least one of your GMP, MPFR, or
MPC libraries has a problem (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45277#c1 ).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Santos 2012-10-06
15:57:15 UTC ---
Please help me out here if I am missing something.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bad optimization: sub |bad optimization: sub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54836
Bug #: 54836
Summary: checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is
working... no
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
15:30:12 UTC ---
Also note that binutils has default search path for plugin. If we installed our
linker plugin there, the ugly gcc-nm/gcc-ar wrappers would not be needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54776
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
15:07:58 UTC ---
Mainline -O3
Time spent in iteration: 11.0926
LTO (with today fix for resolution info)
Time spent in iteration: 10.9666
LTO with V1 API hack disabled
Time spent in iterat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
14:50:27 UTC ---
What you hit here is the V1 linker plugin API hack. We, for purpose, hide
COMDAT objects when we know we can hide them, because otherwise linker will
assign them PREVAILING and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 14:44:07 UTC ---
Slightly reworked example, which I hope is a bit easier to grasp:
program RecursiveInterface
call c(b2) ! b2's argument a2 has an integer argument,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40453
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Enhanced argument checking: |[F95] Enhanced (recursiv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 14:03:14 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 6 14:03:08 2012
New Revision: 192160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192160
Log:
2012-10-06 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-10-06
13:59:59 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Oct 6 13:59:55 2012
New Revision: 192159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192159
Log:
PR lto/54790
* lto.c (resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bad optimization: sub |bad optimization: sub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2012-10-06
13:04:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 6 13:04:35 2012
New Revision: 192158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192158
Log:
2012-10-06 Thomas König
PR libfortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-06 12:52:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28372 [details]
> Candidate patch
actually... looking at the patch, don't you need to deal with the if statements
that ret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-06 12:48:39 UTC ---
The main difference between 'good' and 'bad' seems to be the 'header' lines
bad:
()
(('arch_topology' 'machine_architecture_types' 2))
()
good:
()
(('arch_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-06 12:47:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 28374
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28374
good module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-06 12:46:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 28373
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28373
bad module
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-10-06 12:42:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> 2012-10-06 Tobias Schlüter
>
> PR fortran/51727
> * module.c (write_generic): Traverse tree in left-to-right order.
If tested that thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:35:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Fortran 2008's "12.4.3.4.5 Restrictions on generic declarations" has"
>
> "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
> - one is a proced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:20:17 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 6 12:20:09 2012
New Revision: 192157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192157
Log:
2012-10-06 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eager at eagercon dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2012-10-06
11:42:18 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:42:13 2012
New Revision: 192156
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192156
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54739
* config/m6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter 2012-10-06
11:41:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28372
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28372
Candidate patch
Here's a patch which fixes one case of module contents not being written in a
def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-06 11:20:18
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Oct 6 11:20:11 2012
New Revision: 192155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192155
Log:
PR target/54760
* config/sh/sh.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
Bug #: 54835
Summary: [C++11] Explicit default constructors not respected
during copy-list-initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-08-06 07:54:57 |2012-10-06 7:54:57
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834
Bug #: 54834
Summary: bootstrap fails when building libbacktrace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54833
Bug #: 54833
Summary: Don't wrap __builtin_free(a) in if (a != NULL)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancemen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54832
Bug #: 54832
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Type-bound operator not picked
up with RESULT variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-06
08:18:36 UTC ---
Excellent, thanks Daniel.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-06 08:11:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I double-checked whether this might be related to
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1507
from a different perspective, but I'm pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-10-06 08:02:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28370
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28370
Testcase #3
Undefined reference bug.
With gold:
main.o:main.c:function main: error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51199
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-06 07:58:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
CWG 1417 is now in ready state, which is a good opportunity to implement the
clarification. Meanwhile some traits (like is_copy/move_constructible) should
be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54790
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-10-06 07:57:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 28369
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28369
Testcase #2
Another (perhaps related) issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
Bug #: 54831
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in vt_add_function_parameter, at
var-tracking.c:9412 with -O -fno-split-wide-types -g
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
80 matches
Mail list logo
