[Bug c++/25666] Bad diagnostic for templated destructor as friend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25666 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-

[Bug target/54925] Segfault in gen_split_910

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54925 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-16 00:58:27 UTC --- The following... Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c === --- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(revision 192482) +++ gcc/config/sh/sh.

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-16 00:17:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Since this doesn't seem to be an issue on current trunk (4.8), can we close > > this PR? > > The test case in PR 34807 w

[Bug c++/20681] [4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|gcc-

[Bug c++/54930] Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/54937] New: Invalid loop bound estimate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54937 Bug #: 54937 Summary: Invalid loop bound estimate Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug tree-optimization/54713] [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 --- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-10-15 23:04:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Since this doesn't seem to be an issue on current trunk (4.8), can we close > this PR? The test case in PR 34807 which is marked as a duplicate o

[Bug target/54925] Segfault in gen_split_910

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54925 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-15 22:15:24 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Oct 15 22:15:18 2012 New Revision: 192482 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192482 Log: PR target/54925 * gcc.c-torture/

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 --- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-15 22:09:34 UTC --- Since this doesn't seem to be an issue on current trunk (4.8), can we close this PR?

[Bug target/51244] [SH] Inefficient conditional branch and code around T bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #56 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-15 22:08:14 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Oct 15 22:08:07 2012 New Revision: 192481 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192481 Log: PR target/51244 * config/sh/sh-

[Bug target/54760] [SH] Add __builtin_thread_pointer, __builtin_set_thread_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-15 22:04:42 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Oct 15 22:04:37 2012 New Revision: 192480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192480 Log: PR target/54760 * config/sh/sh.

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-15 21:59:27 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Oct 15 21:59:21 2012 New Revision: 192478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192478 Log: PR target/34777 * gcc.target/sh/

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #62 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-15 21:32:04 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Mon Oct 15 21:31:57 2012 New Revision: 192476 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192476 Log: Backport from trunk (r190222):

[Bug c++/54413] Option for turning off compiler extensions for -std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413 --- Comment #10 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-10-15 21:25:23 UTC --- So maybe we can enable by default for -std=c++1y, etc.

[Bug tree-optimization/54916] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -funroll-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54916 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54413] Option for turning off compiler extensions for -std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413 --- Comment #9 from Peter Sommerlad 2012-10-15 21:21:17 UTC --- Then let us just decide on the following two: -fno-complex-literals -fno-fixed-literals > looks fine in principle.

[Bug c++/54413] Option for turning off compiler extensions for -std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-15 21:19:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I would happy with -ansi -std=c++11 work as I expected. Again, -ansi is a synonym for -std=c++98, so saying "-ansi -std=c++11" is completely poin

[Bug c++/54413] Option for turning off compiler extensions for -std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413 --- Comment #7 from Peter Sommerlad 2012-10-15 21:17:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > So what should these flags look like? > > -fno-complex-literals > -fno-fixed-literals looks fine in principle. > > Or should I use -W? > >

[Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #8 from Seth Heeren 2012-10-15 21:14:45 UTC --- That is great. I confirmed this with gcc version 4.7.0 20111010 (experimental) [trunk revision 179769] The problem has been solved. Thanks everyone, Seth

[Bug c++/54413] Option for turning off compiler extensions for -std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413 --- Comment #6 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-10-15 21:08:27 UTC --- So what should these flags look like? -fno-complex-literals -fno-fixed-literals Or should I use -W? Should -std=c++11, etc. set these by de

[Bug c++/27557] OpenMP threadprivate directive does not work with non-POD types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug lto/45475] target use in libcpp breaks LTO bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45475 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j-frankish at slb dot com --- C

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54936] New: ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4177 with -fnon-call-exceptions and vector float compare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54936 Bug #: 54936 Summary: ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4177 with -fnon-call-exceptions and vector float compare Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4

[Bug c++/17805] too liberal operator lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|paol

[Bug c++/17805] too liberal operator lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-15 19:15:51 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 15 19:15:48 2012 New Revision: 192471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192471 Log: /cp 2012-10-15 Alexandre O

[Bug c++/50080] [DR 468] error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-15 19:13:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 15 19:13:41 2012 New Revision: 192470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192470 Log: /cp 2012-10-15 Paolo Carlin

[Bug debug/54934] [fortran] Invalid >4GB array bounds with 32-bit target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54934 --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil 2012-10-15 18:47:05 UTC --- Created attachment 28452 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28452 .S from reproducer for -m32 output fixed by hand .S file is a fix-up by hand to make -m32

[Bug fortran/54934] Invalid debug/ array bounds w/-fno-range-check and 32-bit target

fno-range-check and it produces valid debug/ output with -m64 but invalid with -m32. gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121015 (experimental)

[Bug go/54918] libgo.so.0 is not runtime compatible between gcc-4.6.2 and gcc-4.7.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54918 --- Comment #2 from Cristian Gafton 2012-10-15 17:53:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > incompatible as in missing symbols or in incompatible behavior between > different > symbols? I have only run across missing symbols, but it loo

[Bug tree-optimization/54916] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -funroll-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54916 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-10-15 17:01:11 UTC --- Thank you for working on this, but the testcase still fails with r192442.

[Bug c++/50080] [DR 468] error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50080] [DR 468] error: 'template' (as a disambiguator) is only allowed within templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50080 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-15 16:48:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 15 16:47:52 2012 New Revision: 192465 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192465 Log: /cp 2012-10-15 Paolo Carlin

[Bug tree-optimization/54935] No way to do if converison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-10-15 15:43:25 UTC --- On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 > > --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery

[Bug fortran/54934] Invalid debug/ array bounds w/-fno-range-check and 32-bit target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54934 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 --- Comment #4 from j-frankish at slb dot com 2012-10-15 15:21:47 UTC --- Using: CFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" CXXFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 --- Comment #3 from j-frankish at slb dot com 2012-10-15 15:20:46 UTC --- Using: CFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" CXXFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 --- Comment #2 from j-frankish at slb dot com 2012-10-15 15:19:36 UTC --- Using: CFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" CXXFLAGS="-march=i486 -mtune=i686 -Os -pipe" ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-

[Bug tree-optimization/54935] No way to do if converison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-10-15 14:58:14 UTC --- On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > We cannot if-convert this because the store to a[i] may trap as it may be > in .rodata. > > That is

[Bug middle-end/54915] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in vector permute expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54915 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54915] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in vector permute expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54915 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-15 14:38:09 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Mon Oct 15 14:38:04 2012 New Revision: 192461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192461 Log: 2012-10-15 Marc Glisse PR tree-

[Bug target/54908] misc regressions on emutls targets remain from dynamic initialization of non-function-local TLS variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-15 14:24:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Undefined symbols: > > "TLS init function for i", referenced from: > > TLS wrapper function for i in ccoTk54U.o

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #25 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-10-15 14:14:12 UTC --- Just to provide some additional numbers on how important this patch is for practical development (and of course to +1 on backports) for a 'typical code change' on a CP

[Bug target/54908] misc regressions on emutls targets remain from dynamic initialization of non-function-local TLS variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-15 14:07:26 UTC --- At r192457 on x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am still seeing the failures in tls.exp due to the absence of ASM_OUTPUT_DEF support on darwin. Any chance we can get the "FIXME other targ

[Bug tree-optimization/54935] No way to do if converison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 13:54:43 UTC --- Yes. This one seems special, it seems purely a parsing issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/54935] No way to do if converison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.8.0 --- Comment #1 from Yur

[Bug tree-optimization/54935] New: No way to do if converison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54935 Bug #: 54935 Summary: No way to do if converison Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug fortran/54934] New: Invalid debug/ array bounds w/-fno-range-check and 32-bit target

produces wrong debug info for i386 target. FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121015 (experimental) Is this a bug or not? Should GDB support 64-bit Fortran array bounds? Should such bounds require -fno-range-check?

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-15 12:59:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Marc, are you aware of this? Yes, attributes don't work so well with templates. This particular case should be fixable, but I'd rather we had a compl

[Bug c++/42124] warning: array subscript is below array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124 --- Comment #4 from Laszlo Papp 2012-10-15 12:42:50 UTC --- Great, thank you! :-)

[Bug lto/54933] New: 'builtin symbol' referenced in section ... defined in discarded section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54933 Bug #: 54933 Summary: 'builtin symbol' referenced in section ... defined in discarded section Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Statu

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-15 11:55:29 UTC --- On 15-Oct-12, at 2:44 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > The patch just introduces -funwind-tables to compile flags, so I > really don't > see how this can c

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-10-15 11:49:08 UTC --- If Fortran requires i to be HUGE(i) + 1 after the loop body then what does it say about the overflow? That is, what would be valid at the end of this loop? if (i .ne. HU

[Bug fortran/54932] New: Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Bug #: 54932 Summary: Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54920] [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/54920] [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-10-15 11:28:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 15 11:28:15 2012 New Revision: 192455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192455 Log: 2012-10-15 Richard Guenther

[Bug tree-optimization/54920] [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-10-15 11:22:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 15 11:22:49 2012 New Revision: 192454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192454 Log: 2012-10-15 Richard Guenther

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/54880] [OOP] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/42124] warning: array subscript is below array bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-

[Bug c++/47250] ICE: in add_substitution, at cp/mangle.c:393 with -fabi-version=5 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47250 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/54916] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -funroll-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54916 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-15 10:34:35 UTC --- Please try a more recent trunk, several unroll issues were fixed over the last weekend.

[Bug c++/54930] Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-15 10:24:14 UTC --- Yep, and tests :)

[Bug c++/54844] [4.8 Regression] ice tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12352

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/54930] Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 10:11:15 UTC --- Great. Remember the docs.

[Bug c++/54930] Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-15 10:09:01 UTC --- Created attachment 28448 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28448 add -Wreturn-local-addr switch This bootstraps, I'll regtest it tonight

[Bug c++/52844] ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52844 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 09:58:06 UTC --- Of course this is also enough: template < class > struct V { }; template < int...Is > void f ( V < Is...>) { } auto g ( ) -> decltype ( f ( V < long > ( ) ) ) ; and declt

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Target|

[Bug c++/54913] [4.8 Regression] qualified lookup in ctor of class template fails to find static member of reference type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54913 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/54915] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: type mismatch in vector permute expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54916] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -funroll-loops -fno-rerun-cse-after-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54916 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug go/54918] libgo.so.0 is not runtime compatible between gcc-4.6.2 and gcc-4.7.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/54920] [4.8 Regression] segfault in tree-ssa-pre.c during Firefox build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/54921] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54926] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure for various files in libbacktrace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/41874] Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41874 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54928] Infinite output with after ICE with macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-15 09:31:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I see. Any chance you can prepare an actual patch? I want to revisit that old patch at some moment, but I don't think I will make it before stage1 cl

[Bug c++/54928] Infinite output with after ICE with macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, error-recovery

[Bug c++/41874] Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41874 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #11 from Paolo Car

[Bug c++/54928] Infinite output with after ICE with macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 09:25:08 UTC --- I see. Any chance you can prepare an actual patch?

[Bug c++/54928] Infinite output with after ICE with macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-15 09:17:28 UTC --- If an internal_error is triggered during macro unwinding, then it will try to macro unwind it, triggering the bug again, and so on. See: prog.cpp:2:45: internal compiler error:

[Bug c++/54928] Infinite output with after ICE with macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54928 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 08:58:45 UTC --- Thanks Manuel. Honestly, however, it's the first time in my life that I see this problem, I suspect isn't *that* easy to trigger (I mean, when the core ICE issue is fixed, has t

[Bug rtl-optimization/47389] ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395 with -fno-combine-stack-adjustments -fno-dse -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-15 08:01:33 UTC --- I cannot reproduce this with trunk r192426, neither with the test case from comment #0 nor with the test from comment #4.

[Bug c++/54927] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12349

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54927 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 07:52:11 UTC --- *** Bug 54929 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/54929] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12349

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54929 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54930] New: Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930 Bug #: 54930 Summary: Add warning switch for "returning reference to temporary" and similar Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/36884] ifcvt poor optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36884 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-15 07:47:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Obviously, noce_try_sign_mask does it's work unconditionally and does > not take into account costs. It appears that it assumes that cheap > barr

[Bug target/54908] misc regressions on emutls targets remain from dynamic initialization of non-function-local TLS variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-10-15 07:43:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Undefined symbols: > "TLS init function for i", referenced from: > TLS wrapper function for i in ccoTk54U.o > __ZTH1i$non_lazy_ptr in

[Bug target/54908] misc regressions on emutls targets remain from dynamic initialization of non-function-local TLS variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54908 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-10-15 07:32:24 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Oct 15 07:32:13 2012 New Revision: 192449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192449 Log: PR target/54908 * libsupc++/ate

[Bug other/54691] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=valgrind doesn't build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-15 07:18:45 UTC --- search_line_acc_char has /* Align the buffer. Mask out any bytes from before the beginning. */ p = (word_type *)((uintptr_t)s & -sizeof(word_type)); It is OK to pad the bu

[Bug other/54691] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=valgrind doesn't build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-15 07:05:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > libcpp will read in advance beyond the end of buffer in > > some cases, even without SSE optimization. > > I'd c

[Bug other/54691] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=valgrind doesn't build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-15 07:00:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > libcpp will read in advance beyond the end of buffer in > some cases, even without SSE optimization. I'd call this a bug.