http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995
Bug #: 54995
Summary: Converting lambda to C-style functions when there is
template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54994
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
06:55:45 UTC ---
*** Bug 54994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995
--- Comment #1 from niXman i.nixman at gmail dot com 2012-10-20 07:15:28 UTC
---
App crash:
http://liveworkspace.org/code/3d5e51c9059ea4f37ce2d0d23739d374
More detailed output.
source:
#include stdio.h
typedef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54996
Bug #: 54996
Summary: gcc with --target=avr fails to build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54996
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54986
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54995
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-20
08:31:12 UTC ---
May be duplicate of other known issues about lambdas vs templates.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
Bug #: 54997
Summary: -Wunused-function gives false warnings for procedures
passed as actual argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 08:58:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Obviously s3 is not being called directly, but it is passed to s2, so it's
certainly not unused.
Well, to be honest, 'dummy' is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 09:03:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
subroutine s2(dummy)
procedure() :: dummy
end subroutine
Also an Unused dummy argument warning is missing here ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54983
--- Comment #4 from Bastian Hecht hechtb at gmail dot com 2012-10-20 10:30:28
UTC ---
Ok I see. Thanks for taking a look at this! I'll check if this is some
regression in the tree and either write a patch or post the issue on the ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
10:34:58 UTC ---
Thank you for testing. It seems that the patch works well for small benchmarks,
I will look into lapack/test_fpu slowdown.
There is problem that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-10-20 11:22:16 UTC ---
If I understand correctly the patch, the default value for
max-inline-min-speedup is 20. This could be over-agressive: for fatigue.f90 the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
12:10:49 UTC ---
Another approach (not for the benchmarks) would be to
make inlining tunable by the user, e.g. support
!GCC$ ATTRIBUTES always_inline ::
System:
Darwin Kernel Version 12.2.0: Sat Aug 25 00:48:52 PDT 2012;
root:xnu-2050.18.24~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
GCC build command: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++
g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.8.0 20121020 (experimental)
Additional notes:
By either naming the union, or supplying a default
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
14:17:14 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Sat Oct 20 14:17:08 2012
New Revision: 192635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192635
Log:
2012-10-20 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
14:17:14 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Sat Oct 20 14:17:08 2012
New Revision: 192635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192635
Log:
2012-10-20 Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com 2012-10-20
14:28:28 UTC ---
192529 OK
192538 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-20 14:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hi,
can someone fortran aware please double-check that the tests
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_9.f90:
version 4.8.0 20121020 (experimental) [trunk revision 192631] (GCC)
[vocms123] ~/public/ctest/bugs48 $ c++ -msse3 -std=c++11 -c -O2 ice_mcp.ii
In file included from
/afs/cern.ch/cms/sw/ReleaseCandidates/slc5_amd64_gcc472/thu/6.1.LTO-thu-02/CMSSW_6_1_LTO_X_2012-10-18-0200/src/DataFormats/CLHEP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54999
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-20
15:43:13 UTC ---
can someone fortran aware please double-check that the tests
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_9.f90: New test.
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54725
--- Comment #8 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org 2012-10-20
16:55:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
that patch doesn't work as there is a typo in Make-lang.in. it needs to be:
CFLAGS-fortran/cpp.o +=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-20
17:11:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The failure is caused by higher register pressure in the THEN branch of the
case, though I am not sure why the register
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-20
17:39:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
i can confirm that the proposed simplification of the test cases eliminates the
failures of hoist-register-pressure.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54855
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 17:43:44
UTC ---
Uros' reply at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01327.html copied
here for convenience:
But, we _do_ have vec_merge pattern that describes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55001
Bug #: 55001
Summary: Handle VEC_COND_EXPR in tree-vect-generic.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 18:45:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Also an Unused dummy argument warning is missing here ...
This is fixed by the following patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55002
Bug #: 55002
Summary: trailing return type is rejected in function signature
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55002
--- Comment #1 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-10-20
19:20:00 UTC ---
I've probably overcomplicated my example. Simpler test case:
--
int f(auto (*ff) - int (int) ) {
return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55002
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20
21:00:26 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Oct 20 21:00:23 2012
New Revision: 192641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192641
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54315
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 21:17:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #12)
* unused-warnings for module variables
Here is a draft patch which fixes the test case in comment 14:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54997
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 21:46:12 UTC ---
The following removes the warning for s3:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003
Bug #: 55003
Summary: [C++11] Member function pointer not working as
constexpr initializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55002
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug #: 55004
Summary: [meta-bug] constexpr issues
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54998
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-20
23:21:42 UTC ---
Related to PR54768.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-20
23:31:41 UTC ---
Related to PR51675.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54991
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-21
02:47:32 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Sun Oct 21 02:47:28 2012
New Revision: 192645
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192645
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55005
Bug #: 55005
Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-3.c FAILs
with -fPIC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
54 matches
Mail list logo