http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:33:10
UTC ---
Following up on my earlier message.
Jon Beniston (original author) or Sebastien Bourdeauducq (current maintainer)
... please reply.
This particular issue should be simple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:22:22
UTC ---
I added Jakub because I think this was the patch which broke it:
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 20 18:56:49 2012 +
PR rtl-optimization/54294
* fwprop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:20:02
UTC ---
git bisect should help:
[0e797c2e325bfe0676fc9b9e5baee01aefb164f5] /cp 2012-08-20 Paolo Carlini
[joel@baltimore gcc]$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 1 revision left to test a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55200
--- Comment #4 from Chris Lundquist 2012-11-04
05:32:44 UTC ---
Updated.
For quick reference, the line described in context can be found here.
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v1_9_3_286/complex.c#L1988
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55200
--- Comment #3 from Chris Lundquist 2012-11-04
05:30:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 28607
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28607
Rubylang complex.i under GCC 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55200
--- Comment #1 from Chris Lundquist 2012-11-04
05:00:51 UTC ---
Please let me know what further information I can provide. Unfortunately I was
unable to make a simple test case. I can't figure out why it is dying on a
matched } to close a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55200
Bug #: 55200
Summary: RubyLang complex.c Internal compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
James Y Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foom at fuhm dot net
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54747
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55192
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 03:55:28
UTC ---
Output of git bisect
[joel@baltimore gcc]$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 3 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[5169661db3501031dfeb1971582809a702d6cebe] Integra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 02:52:31 UTC ---
On 3-Nov-12, at 4:45 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
>
> --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libquadmath |middle-end
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55199
Bug #: 55199
Summary: Equivalenced variable has wrong type when used with
generic member function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
with-as=/opt/gnu/bin/as
--enable-shared --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu --prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.8
--with-gmp=/opt/gnu/gcc/gmp --enable-threads=posix --enable-debug=no
--disable-nls --without-cloog --without-ppl
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,java,ada,obj-c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 01:56:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 28605
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28605
Preprocessed test case - from newlib
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 01:55:21
UTC ---
Still happening but on a different file. Preprocessed source attached.
xgcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
Short command to go with preprocessed source:
/home/joel/v850/tools/b-gcc-svn-avr-rtems4.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55197
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55197
Bug #: 55197
Summary: Use statement for omp_lib causes ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54255
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03
21:39:10 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Nov 3 21:39:06 2012
New Revision: 193127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193127
Log:
Add check_effective_target_masm_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-11-03 20:45:10 UTC ---
Could you attach preprocessed source and the exact options passsed to cc1
(from -v --save-temos compilation) so that I can look at this in a cross
environment?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55196
Bug #: 55196
Summary: GCC 4.8 build error : link error on OS X 10.6
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #8 from Adi 2012-11-03 19:14:41 UTC
---
Thank you for your response. (Sorry for the repeated emails. I did it because I
got delivery failures on the first 4 mails.)
So just to be 100% sure on this: If I want to be sure all my constr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*|
--- Comment #1 from Andreas S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
--- Comment #9 from Jan Smets 2012-11-03
18:25:32 UTC ---
Verified. Thanks Andrew.
(Should I mark it as Resolved?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:23:38
UTC ---
Created attachment 28604
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28604
libgcc preprocessed file which trips bug
Description on how to reproduce given messages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:22:30
UTC ---
xgcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
Now fails just building libgcc with what appears to be the same error.
Short command line for preprocessed
Version|unknown |4.8.0
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:08:34
UTC ---
Still broken
xgcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
Any chance I can get some advice on how to fix this? The autoconf probe just
isn't finding wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:07:01
UTC ---
Sorry... bad cut and paste. The assembly is OK. The cross compiler generates an
ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
Bug #: 55195
Summary: [4.8 Regression] shorten_branches generates incorrect
forward branch distances
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-03 16:44:14 UTC
---
> --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-11-03
> 15:23:25 UTC ---
> Also fails on powerpc, likely universal.
Yes, it fails for me too, I am looking into it.
Honza
) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
This is enough to trip the bug:
/home/joel/v850/tools/b-gcc-svn/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/v850/tools/b-gcc-svn/./gcc/ -c -O2 -g h8300_bug.c
Dropping the -g is sufficient to let it compile.
Test case is very basic:
int main(int argc
gnu
--target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-isl=/usr/local --with-cloog=/usr/local
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) (GCC)
I compile the attached test case with command line:
$ g++-4.8 -g -Og testcase2.i -c
which leads to the ICE below. The error only appears with both -Og and
ead, the compiler generates assembly
language that cannot be assembled by the binutils cvs head or 2.22
xgcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
Attached are the preprocessed C code and generated assembly.
This is sufficient to trip the issue:
/home/joel/v850/tool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #33 from François Dumont 2012-11-03
15:28:30 UTC ---
I fear that this performance issue is a normal drawback of the major
enhancement for PR 41975. Before this evolution the hashtable data model was
like a std::vector. During the ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|m68k-*-*|
--- Comment #1 from Andreas S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner 2012-11-03
14:02:20 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Sat Nov 3 14:02:13 2012
New Revision: 193121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193121
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn 2012-11-03 13:48:46
UTC ---
The New York area has experienced a major natural disaster. I am located near
NYC. GCC support is provided by volunteers. Repeatedly resending your message
will not elicit a f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|
Priority: P3
Component: translation
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
Hello !
The following testcase makes GCC 4.8.0 as of 20121103 ICE at -O2 and higher.
$ cat antic.c
int a, b;
void f(void)
{
b = a || b;
for(a = 0; a < 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55162
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-03 12:19:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I've created a new PR 55190 for this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55190
Bug #: 55190
Summary: [SH] ivopts causes loop setup bloat
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #57 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-03
12:01:05 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Nov 3 12:01:01 2012
New Revision: 193119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193119
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #2 from meanone 2012-11-03 11:11:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Compiled with MinGW port of g++, compiles without errors or warnings:
>
> It does warn if you ask it to: -Wall
I can unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55183
--- Comment #5 from Stephen 2012-11-03 10:48:02 UTC
---
Thanks for the information. The issue is indeed about use of reinterpret_cast
in a constexpr method.
The consensus, according to bug 55039, is that this should not be supported.
Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-03 10:40:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Compiled with MinGW port of g++, compiles without errors or warnings:
It does warn if you ask it to: -Wall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
Bug #: 55189
Summary: g++ compiler does not report missing return on
function with return type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188
Bug #: 55188
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c
scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests
v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into" 1
Classific
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187
Bug #: 55187
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr49960.c
scan-tree-dump-times parloops "SUCCESS: may be
parallelized" 0
Classification: Unclassified
54 matches
Mail list logo
