[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] New: [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 Bug #: 55247 Summary: [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-09 02:36:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28644 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28644 A patch This patch prints SImode register names to force addr32 prefix

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-09 05:08:29 UTC --- [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ cat /export/gnu/import/delta-2006.08.03/x.c typedef unsigned int uint32_t; typedef unsigned int uintptr_t; typedef uint32_t Elf32_Word;

[Bug c++/55248] New: Segmentation Fault - instantiating template with partial specialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55248 Bug #: 55248 Summary: Segmentation Fault - instantiating template with partial specialization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug c++/55245] Compiler segfault when compiling the small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 --- Comment #2 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2012-11-09 06:05:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The problem actually exists in main line compiler too. This is another test case. Segfaults without option, but builds ok

[Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966 --- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-09 06:39:33 UTC --- Created attachment 28646 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28646 test case (preprocessed with gcc 4.7.2)

[Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?

in cycles 45998 size 6. v2: time in cycles 11128.1 size 6. v3: time in cycles 10383 gcc version 4.8.0 20121108 (experimental) [trunk revision 19] (GCC) [vocms123] ~/public/ctest/bugs48 $ c++ -O2 smatrix.ii ; ./a.out size 5. v1: time in cycles 14040.5 size 5. v2: time in cycles 3264.85

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #30 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch 2012-11-09 07:31:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) I committed the C-only version of the patch as the issues mentioned in comment #27 couldn't be addressed

<    1   2