http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl
2013-01-23 04:28:01 UTC ---
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:27:11AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Index: match.c
> ===
> --- match.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
--- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth 2013-01-23
04:01:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> BTW, the reason this works when forcing the instrumented path as Torvald
> suggested (comment #7) is because when f1() is instrumented, the call to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-23
02:48:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 23 02:48:00 2013
New Revision: 195397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195397
Log:
PR c++/53650
* call.c (type_ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-22 23:38:39 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 22 23:38:34 2013
New Revision: 195391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195391
Log:
/cp
2013-01-22 Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-22
23:15:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last
> week, whereas you fixed PR54494 months ago. Note that here the stores ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-22 23:13:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I thought I fixed this already via PR54494
Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last
week, whereas you fixed PR5449
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-22
22:51:33 UTC ---
I think you need to report this bug to Ubuntu/Linaro as I said I had fixed this
via bug 54494
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081
Bug #: 56081
Summary: Seg fault ICE on select with bad case
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-22 21:27:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> It would be simpler to simply type r1234 in Bugzilla instead of
> http://gcc.gnu.org/r1234 and have it linkified to point to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-01-22
21:24:25 UTC ---
It would be simpler to simply type r1234 in Bugzilla instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/r1234 and have it linkified to point to
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=1234. Is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|[4.6/4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080
Bug #: 56080
Summary: Incorrect code generated when changing lvalue of
pointer and using inline code and optimizations.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 20:58:45 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jan 22 20:58:37 2013
New Revision: 195386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195386
Log:
PR target/56028
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Sum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Bug #: 56079
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008
--- Comment #7 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 19:08:10 UTC
---
Unfortunately, I do not understand a thing about all the internals and the
actual implementations. I just wanted to let you know that I am totally
overwhelm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794
Janis Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794
Janis Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
--- Comment #7 from Stephen 2013-01-22 17:28:14 UTC
---
Thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078
Bug #: 56078
Summary: causes cc1 to crash
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
17:03:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 22 17:03:33 2013
New Revision: 195382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195382
Log:
PR middle-end/56074
* dumpfile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
16:41:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:41:30 2013
New Revision: 195381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195381
Log:
PR target/55686
* config/i386/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-22
16:29:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:28:58 2013
New Revision: 195380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195380
Log:
PR c++/53650
* call.c (type_has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29251|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-22
16:25:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:25:10 2013
New Revision: 195379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195379
Log:
PR c++/56071
* pt.c (maybe_inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-22
16:05:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:05:04 2013
New Revision: 195378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195378
Log:
PR c++/56071
* pt.c (maybe_inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29014|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Bug #: 56077
Summary: volatile ignored when function inlined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
Yuri Rumyantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #14 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-01-22
15:32:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 29250
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29250
testcase in F90
Reproducer for IPA_CP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos 2013-01-22 15:30:48
UTC ---
I have some further patches that replace the previously posted ones that I will
upload soon. Should these also be sent to gcc-patches or it's unnecessary since
they're being po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-22
15:22:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 15:22:16 2013
New Revision: 195377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195377
Log:
PR c++/56059
* tree.c (strip_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-22 15:09:50 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 22 15:09:45 2013
New Revision: 195375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195375
Log:
2013-01-22 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] SIGSEGV on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
13:35:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29249
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29249
gcc48-pr55374.patch
Untested fix. If -static-libasan is missing, it just moves -lasan ear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek 2013-01-22
13:24:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 29248
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29248
pr56035
Potential fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter 2013-01-22
12:56:26 UTC ---
Just for the fun of it, another confusing way this error message appears:
$ cat t3.f90
character c(5)
do c=2,3
end do
END
$ gfortran t3.f90
t3.f90:3.4:
do c=2,3
1
Error: Loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076
Bug #: 56076
Summary: [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in
read_line_header
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075
Bug #: 56075
Summary: [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of
code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-apple-darwin9,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55891
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-22
11:52:27 UTC ---
Form
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/E_ll5RFNL14
FX said:
Compiling shared libraries on Darwin is a bit more tricky than on your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra 2013-01-22 11:41:57
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Jan 22 11:41:53 2013
New Revision: 195370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195370
Log:
PR libgomp/51376
PR libgomp/56073
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2013-01-22 11:41:56
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Jan 22 11:41:53 2013
New Revision: 195370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195370
Log:
PR libgomp/51376
PR libgomp/56073
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
10:52:55 UTC ---
One way out of this would be for libasan.a to be an *.o object rather than *.a
archive:
mv libasan.a libasan_a.a
gcc -Wl,-r -nostdlib -o libasan.a -Wl,--whole-archive libasan_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
10:33:53 UTC ---
The patch isn't sufficient. For both -static-libasan -fsanitize=address
and just -fsanitize=address, we want -Bstatic -lasan -Bdynamic resp. -lasan
to go before all occurrence
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-01-22
10:22:21 UTC ---
The problem looks to be in fix_loop_structures:
/* If there was no latch, schedule the loop for removal. */
if (!first_latch)
loop->header = NULL;
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53609
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2013-01-22
10:05:13 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Jan 22 10:05:05 2013
New Revision: 195367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195367
Log:
PR c++/53609 - Wrong variadic template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074
Bug #: 56074
Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-22 08:46:48
UTC ---
I was thinking of removing (!o,n) alternative from movdi (together with
corresponding splitters). Splitter/peephole2 actually always generates movabs
$N,%reg; mov $reg,(mem) unle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073
Bug #: 56073
Summary: SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071
--- Comment #3 from Stephen 2013-01-22 08:41:02 UTC
---
clang has other issues relating to this. Something to maybe add unit tests for
if they don't exist already:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/27226
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-22
08:23:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 22 08:23:32 2013
New Revision: 195360
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195360
Log:
PR libquadmath/56072
* libquadm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
82 matches
Mail list logo
