http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
--- Comment #28 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-14
06:11:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > You are right, your suggestions is what I sketched in comment #21 as
> > choices 1
> > or 2. Sorry for my uncl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55670
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-14
04:31:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 14 04:31:03 2013
New Revision: 196043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196043
Log:
PR c++/55670
* parser.c (cp_par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-14
04:30:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 14 04:30:26 2013
New Revision: 196042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196042
Log:
PR c++/55680
* pt.c (maybe_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #36 from Andris Pavenis 2013-02-14
04:25:17 UTC ---
This way does not work for DJGPP v2.03 (version v2.04pre is OK).
For DJGPP v2.03:
AC_PROG_LN_S tries 'ln -s', which do not work, after that it falls back to
simple
'ln'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55582
--- Comment #6 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 02:55:48 UTC ---
Author: emsr
Date: Thu Feb 14 02:55:42 2013
New Revision: 196041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196041
Log:
gcc/libcpp/
2013-02-13 Ed Smi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56314
--- Comment #2 from H. Peter Anvin 2013-02-14 02:23:53
UTC ---
Consider the following syntax:
__attribute__((saved(...),used(...),fixed(...)))
... as the equivalent to -fcall-saved-*, -fcall-used-*, and -ffixed-*
respectively.
In L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Andre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56315
Bug #: 56315
Summary: ARM: Improve use of 64-bit constants in logical
operations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56314
Bug #: 56314
Summary: Please allow per-function specification of register
conventions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56313
--- Comment #1 from Joshua Conner 2013-02-14
01:39:55 UTC ---
In case it helps, the pattern for aarch64_vmls is written as:
(set (op0)
(minus (op1)
(mult (op2)
(op3
Restructuring this to:
(set (op0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56313
Bug #: 56313
Summary: aarch64 backend not using fmls instruction
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner 2013-02-13
22:38:12 UTC ---
The patch does align the .rodata section to 16 byte alignment, but the code to
load up the auto vector from constant memory does not do vectorization.
If I use -fno-sectio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886
--- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-13 22:33:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29447
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29447
gcc-4.7.2-define-have_gas_aligned_comm.patch
(In reply to comment #0)
> case $target_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312
Bug #: 56312
Summary: Firefox 20.0a1 compilation with enabled LTO fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311
--- Comment #1 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2013-02-13 22:31:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29446
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29446
cross-x86_64-pc-mingw64-gcc-stage1.log.xz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56311
Bug #: 56311
Summary: gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h: In function ‘_func’:
gcc/include-fixed/stdio.h:135:3: error: expected
declaration specifiers before ‘__extension__’
Classification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2013-02-13
22:13:42 UTC ---
> In LTO:
>
> /* If this variable belongs to the global constant pool, retrieve the
> pre-computed RTL or recompute it in LTO mode. */
> if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
Bug #: 56310
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in decide_about_value, at
ipa-cp.c:3310 with -fipa-cp -fno-early-inlining
-fipa-cp-clone --param=ipa-cp-eval-threshold=1
Classif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-13
21:58:57 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Feb 13 21:58:53 2013
New Revision: 196034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196034
Log:
2013-02-13 Marc Glisse
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56185
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Starke
2013-02-13 21:08:40 UTC ---
This issue does not occur with checking enabled. See below a working
configuration.
COLLECT_GCC=D:\Programme\msys\mingw64\bin\x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc.exe
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #3 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-13 20:29:12 UTC ---
Intel Xeon X5570 @ 2.93GHz
(In reply to comment #2)
> Which target is this on? On some (most non x86 targets) conditional moves are
> faster than compare and bran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #2 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56181
--- Comment #18 from Jan-Benedict Glaw 2013-02-13 20:23:17
UTC ---
Confirmed to build again, thanks. (Though I didn't test the resulting
compiler.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
--- Comment #1 from arturomdn at gmail dot com 2013-02-13 20:22:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 29443
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29443
Self contained source file with parameter x passed by reference (fast)
This sour
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
Bug #: 56309
Summary: -O3 optimizer generates conditional moves instead of
compare and branch resulting in almost 2x slower code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #16 from A. Kasahara
2013-02-13 19:21:33 UTC ---
Thank you for the fix!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55526
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55581
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:18:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 18:17:39 2013
New Revision: 196025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196025
Log:
PR c++/55710
* semantics.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:15:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 55720 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55720
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56308
Bug #: 56308
Summary: GCC 4.8 segfaults when building GCC 4.7
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:38 2013
New Revision: 196024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196024
Log:
PR c++/55879
* semantics.c (cxx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:28 2013
New Revision: 196023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196023
Log:
PR c++/55993
* semantics.c (cxx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56155
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:16 2013
New Revision: 196022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196022
Log:
PR c++/56155
* decl.c (build_en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:05 2013
New Revision: 196021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196021
Log:
PR c++/56135
* pt.c (tsubst_cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-13
17:51:17 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:51:11 2013
New Revision: 196020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196020
Log:
2013-02-13 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-13
17:40:33 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:40:22 2013
New Revision: 196019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196019
Log:
2013-02-13 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-13
17:14:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29441
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29441
testcase
Preprocessed testcase reproducible with ./cc1plus -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56302
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56302
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-13
16:09:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 13 16:09:27 2013
New Revision: 196018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196018
Log:
PR c++/56302
* semantics.c (fin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37021
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener 2013-02-13
15:58:31 UTC ---
The following testcase shows the issue well:
_Complex double self[1024];
_Complex double a[1024][1024];
_Complex double b[1024];
void foo (void)
{
int i, j;
for (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 15:44:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 29440
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29440
delete-insn-tentative-fix-PR56242.patch
> I'll give your patch a try later today w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56184
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-02-13
15:15:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Unfortunately I'm not really familiar with the live range splitting code;
> maybe
> Vladimir can help with this?
Yes, Ulrich. I've started
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-13
15:09:06 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 13 15:08:59 2013
New Revision: 196016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196016
Log:
2012-02-13 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29428|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 14:44:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Should be fixed - for the the trunk only - since 2012-01-09
Ok, so can we close this guy? Or is there need for a backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-13
14:38:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> The test case fails because the match is too strict.
Should be fixed - for the the trunk only - since 2012-01-09 via
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
Bug #: 56307
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra
"Created a debug-only replacement for s"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-02-13 14:09:26 UTC ---
On 2013-02-12 6:03 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I've tried to reproduce this bug by building a cross compiler using the
> hppa2.0w-unknown-linux-gnu target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener 2013-02-13
13:31:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 13 13:31:18 2013
New Revision: 196013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196013
Log:
2013-02-13 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56181
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener 2013-02-13
13:03:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > The fix causes a build regression for mn10300:
> >
> > g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56306
--- Comment #3 from Uwe Seidler 2013-02-13
12:35:34 UTC ---
enhacemant is ok
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56306
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-13
12:22:19 UTC ---
GCC can obviously alter its internal include paths to its own headers because
it knows what they contain and how to find the contents. It can't possibly know
about arbitrary n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54126
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Mikhaltsou 2013-02-13
12:20:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 29430 [details]
> simple fail case
>
> I think I have an even simplier test case, I guess it's the same problem (at
> least t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56306
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-13
12:03:27 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 13 12:03:18 2013
New Revision: 196011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196011
Log:
2013-02-13 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56295
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-02-13
11:51:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 29425 [details]
> Modified testcase
>
> This slightly modified testcase still shows some strange difference between
> LTO
> /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56306
Bug #: 56306
Summary: -m32 does not support all includes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
Bug #: 56305
Summary: passing array of character with len>1 to c_loc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-13 11:19:37 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-12
> 19:27:16 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #0)
>> The test is l.34:
>>
>> 34 if (fp2 /= fp4) call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-13
10:56:15 UTC ---
With the debug counters I have identified the first function where the
difference in behavior of intra-SRA behavior with -g vs -g0 caused the
comparison failure but could not sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56128
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener 2013-02-13
10:55:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 29436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29436
patch
-fsection-anchors enables pass_ipa_increase_alignment (the vectorizer can
not alig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13
10:44:11 UTC ---
The problem is already fixed in mainline and 4_7-branch, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
--- Comment #4 from crillion at tiscali dot it 2013-02-13 10:41:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 29435
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29435
the ii file generated by the compiler (compressed with 7zip because bugzilla
doens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crillion at tiscali dot it
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-13
10:40:03 UTC ---
Oops, fixed reference Bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53137 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crillion at tiscali dot it
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|MinGW |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56303
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
--- Comment #1 from crillion at tiscali dot it 2013-02-13 10:36:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 29434
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29434
the source code which generates the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56304
Bug #: 56304
Summary: [C++1] ICE in get_expr_operands, at
tree-ssa-operands.c for template class, using lambda
with closure on member variable, also called by the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #35 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:25:21 UTC ---
Kai,
> * Makefile.in (LN_S_RECUSIVE): New.
please fix up the log messages.
Thanks,
- Tom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56303
--- Comment #1 from crillion at tiscali dot it 2013-02-13 10:22:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 29433
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29433
the source code which generates the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #34 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-13 10:21:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:21:25 2013
New Revision: 196004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196004
Log:
PR target/52122
* Makefile.in (LN_S_RECUS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #33 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-13 10:20:49
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:20:30 2013
New Revision: 196003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196003
Log:
PR target/52122
* Makefile.in (LN_S_RECUS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #32 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-13 10:19:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Feb 13 10:19:26 2013
New Revision: 196002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196002
Log:
PR target/52122
* Makefile.in (LN_S_RECUS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56303
Bug #: 56303
Summary: [C++11] ICE in lambda with closure on member variable
of a template class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-13
10:09:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> --- Makefile.in (revision 195997)
> +++ Makefile.in (working copy)
> @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@
> && touch stamp-libada
> -rm -rf adainclude
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #30 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 10:06:11 UTC ---
This will probably fix it:
...
Index: Makefile.in
===
--- Makefile.in (revision 195997)
+++ Makefile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P2
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
