http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #43 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-22
07:11:06 UTC ---
gcc r196201: -O2 -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations
clang 175735: -O2
x86_64 linux, both are using the new 7fff8000 shadow offset
400.perlbench, 1136.00,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #19 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-22
07:01:51 UTC ---
In clang, static asan-rt is the default and the only option on Linux.
(On Mac, the only option is dynamic, but that's a quite unfortunate limitation
of the platform, it c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-22
06:55:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> It works for me, thank you very much for your efforts.
> Why don't you set -static-libasan as default?
> Because I still don't understand in which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #17 from Takaki Makino
2013-02-22 06:38:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> r196201 landed the fresh asan run-time into gcc.
> -static-libasan should work well now, please try.
It works for me, thank you very much for you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29521|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Hill 2013-02-22 02:31:03
UTC ---
Well, the trouble is nowadays that many CPUs are exactly "this, except without
that". But anyways, the test is fragile. There is no reason something like
-march=core2 -mno-sse3 sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-22
02:03:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29521
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29521
backport of gcc-4_7-branch fixes to gcc-4_6-branch
The attached patch backports the addition
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2013-02-22
02:01:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 29520
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29520
patch to fix gcc-4_7-branch bootstrap against texinfo 5.0
Current gcc-4_7-branch still fails
2013/2/21 Dmitry Marakasov :
> Hi!
>
> I'm not really sure which (g++ or libstdc++) problem this really is, so
> posting into both lists.
It doesn't look like a problem of libstdc++ to me (see below why).
> The problem is described here:
> http://cpp-next.com/archive/2009/10/exceptionally-moving/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
--- Comment #5 from Stephan Tolksdorf 2013-02-21
21:38:27 UTC ---
That was fast, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression] suboptimal |suboptimal register
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
21:29:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 21:29:29 2013
New Revision: 196215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196215
Log:
PR middle-end/56420
* expmed.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
21:28:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 21:28:03 2013
New Revision: 196214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196214
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/50339
* low
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56423
Bug #: 56423
Summary: F08/0071: Shall reject invalid Vector subscript target
with Pointer assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56422
Bug #: 56422
Summary: IR F08/0086: gfortran rejects valid implied-shape
arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #54 from Janne Blomqvist 2013-02-21
20:39:58 UTC ---
I'd suggest to close the unformatted sequential part of this PR as WONTFIX.
Maybe it worked sometime in the past for small record sizes when buffered IO
was used for pipes, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56140
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56418
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56108
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-21
20:16:34 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Feb 21 20:16:26 2013
New Revision: 196213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196213
Log:
PR middle-end/56108
* trans-me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #53 from Janne Blomqvist 2013-02-21
20:13:12 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Feb 21 20:13:04 2013
New Revision: 196212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196212
Log:
Fix regression when writing formatted se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56421
Bug #: 56421
Summary: Non-matching overload produces template substitution
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #52 from Janne Blomqvist 2013-02-21
19:03:19 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Feb 21 19:03:10 2013
New Revision: 196210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196210
Log:
Fix regression when writing formatted se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #8 from koraq at xs4all dot nl 2013-02-21 18:56:06 UTC ---
I can confirm it is fixed in Debian Experimental 4.8-20130217-1. Thanks for the
fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Jan
Hi!
I'm not really sure which (g++ or libstdc++) problem this really is, so
posting into both lists.
The problem is described here:
http://cpp-next.com/archive/2009/10/exceptionally-moving/
- You have two classes:
A, which has a proper move constructor which doesn't throw
B, which which only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #13 from Sérgio Basto 2013-02-21
17:45:53 UTC ---
Hi, it see that was applied on gcc-4.8.0-0.12
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56320
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-21 16:23:52 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-20
> 19:46:42 UTC ---
> Should be fixed now, I hope.
Unfortunately, this is not enough. I had the equival
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56310
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-21
16:08:58 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Feb 21 16:08:51 2013
New Revision: 196207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196207
Log:
2013-02-21 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56420
Bug #: 56420
Summary: Arithmetic error in computation with compile time
unsigned __int128 constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
14:51:49 UTC ---
Broken by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186546
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56419
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRM
tive
to which C++ standard is requested.
Originally reported by Mike Spear. Mike says this works with 4.7.2, but
doesn't with g++ (GCC) 4.8.0 20130221 (experimental) (revision
196192). I've confirmed with an early-December build.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
Summary|Issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56418
Bug #: 56418
Summary: errors do not show
the types (makes it hard to debug)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
12:57:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 29517
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29517
gcc48-pr50339.patch
Patch that improves 4.8 generated code to one insn better than what 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55996
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-21
12:36:46 UTC ---
Patch to make DF-scan dumps cleaner and speed up complete re-scanning
and deferred rescanning:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00961.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 12:26:54 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Feb 21 12:26:44 2013
New Revision: 196202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196202
Log:
2013-02-21 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56416
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #16 from Evgeniy Stepanov
2013-02-21 11:51:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > We've got this problem on Android, where an instrumented JNI library is
> > loaded
> > into Dalvik VM, which is o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #15 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-21
11:35:51 UTC ---
r196201 landed the fresh asan run-time into gcc.
-static-libasan should work well now, please try.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Version|unk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731
Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.1 |4.7.2
--- Comment #2 from Martin 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-21
10:52:44 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 21 10:52:39 2013
New Revision: 196200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196200
Log:
2013-02-21 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2013-02-21
10:52:44 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 21 10:52:39 2013
New Revision: 196200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196200
Log:
2013-02-21 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.7.2
--- Comment #7 from Martin 2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|Perfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||56131
--- Comment #12 from St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56398
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-21
10:28:57 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Feb 21 10:21:19 2013
New Revision: 196199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196199
Log:
New test for PR56398.
Added:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Bug #: 56417
Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
09:56:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:56:01 2013
New Revision: 196198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196198
Log:
PR bootstrap/56258
* doc/invoke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
09:43:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:42:39 2013
New Revision: 196197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196197
Log:
PR bootstrap/56258
* doc/invoke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
09:41:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:40:44 2013
New Revision: 196196
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196196
Log:
PR bootstrap/56258
* doc/invoke
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56405
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-21
09:33:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:33:49 2013
New Revision: 196195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196195
Log:
PR inline-asm/56405
* expr.c (e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56416
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-21
09:23:38 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:23:31 2013
New Revision: 196194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196194
Log:
2012-02-21 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-02-21
09:11:21 UTC ---
This bug was introduced by the following fix:
r195940 is guilty:
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 11 13:33:19 2013
New Revision: 195940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56416
Bug #: 56416
Summary: texinfo 5: Many warnings for gfortran's *.texi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-02-21
08:59:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29515
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29515
testcase
Test must be compiled with "-O3 -funroll-loops" options.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56398
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de
2013-02-21 08:58:11 UTC ---
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56398
>
> --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
Bug #: 56415
Summary: Performance regression after fix for 56273
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56362
--- Comment #2 from Jay 2013-02-21 08:07:15 UTC
---
Looking back at other data I have..this has something to do with configure
-enable-checking..but I don't know exactly what.
I am *guessing* that the signedness of the bitfield ref and t
79 matches
Mail list logo