[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56576] wrong code for aliased union at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56576 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug tree-optimization/56577] wrong code for aliased union on gcc 4.7 only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56577 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug lto/56578] New: Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56578 Bug #: 56578 Summary: Testcase behaves differently when compiled with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/55628] Segmentation fault (segfault) on invalid template oneliner

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55628 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56493] Performance regression in google dense hashmap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 11:49:02 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Mar 9 11:48:53 2013 New Revision: 196573 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196573 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56529] [SH] Calls to __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i are generated on SH2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54760] [SH] Add __builtin_thread_pointer, __builtin_set_thread_pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54760 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/55146] jumptables with byte entries produce wrong code with -Os/-O2 for SH-1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55146 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 13:00:33 UTC --- Kaz, do you have any suggestion what to do with this issue on 4.8 ? Although I haven't looked deeper into the problem, I'm afraid the actual bug is not

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug target/51708] SH Target: SHAD / SHLD constant not CSE-ed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51708 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 14:43:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) In order to 'force' the constant load to be CSE-ed the constant load and dynamic shift patterns have to be emitted in the

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at

[Bug c++/52819] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:3136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #43 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 14:57:52 UTC --- The problem with combine is only collateral damage from what dse1 is doing to this function. It's loading stored values into registers and

[Bug target/13423] sh-elf: V4SFmode passed in integer registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo

[Bug other/56579] New: 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 Bug #: 56579 Summary: 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug other/56579] 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 dacrick at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dacrick at gmail dot

[Bug other/56579] 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/56579] 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 --- Comment #3 from dacrick at gmail dot com 2013-03-09 16:48:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) That most likely means that the programm is invoking undefined behaviour and thus invalid. A quick check with clang++

[Bug other/56579] 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2013-03-09 16:51:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) That most likely means that the programm is invoking undefined behaviour and thus

[Bug other/56579] 4.8.0-20130303 g++ optimisation flags cause segfault or different program output

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56579 dacrick at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 --- Comment #44 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 17:25:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29628 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29628 Re-use store register if possible This patch resolves the issue

[Bug c/56580] New: Internal compiler error when trying to compile a sequence of NOPs inside a loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56580 Bug #: 56580 Summary: Internal compiler error when trying to compile a sequence of NOPs inside a loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c/56580] Internal compiler error when trying to compile a sequence of NOPs inside a loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56580 --- Comment #1 from Yi Yang ahyangyi at gmail dot com 2013-03-09 17:37:11 UTC --- Oops, perhaps I should report this to the Gentoo Bugzilla? However, I don't see an option to delete this. I will apologize if you think it's not

build error for gcc 4.7.2 on Solaris 10

Hello, I get the following error in building gcc 4.7.2 on Solaris 10: gcc tail nohup.out.3 chmod a+r ${fix_dir}/limits.h; \ done cp: preserving permissions for 'include-fixed/limits.h': Operation not applicable make[3]: *** [stmp-int-hdrs] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory

[Bug middle-end/51544] uninitialized variable false positive prevents bootstrap with -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-03-09 20:07:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I've been trying to bootstrap using -g -O3 in BOOT_CFLAGS. That doesn't work, but -g -O2 of course does. I am pleased

[Bug fortran/56581] New: seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 Bug #: 56581 Summary: seg fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56582] New: ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56582 Bug #: 56582 Summary: ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/56346] FAIL: g++.dg/tls/thread_local3.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56346 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 21:30:13 UTC --- Created attachment 29631 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29631 .s file Target doesn't have __cxa_thread_atexit or

[Bug c++/56583] New: ICE with constexpr ctor and nested structs and unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56583 Bug #: 56583 Summary: ICE with constexpr ctor and nested structs and unions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/56583] ICE with constexpr ctor and nested structs and unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56583 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54922] [C++11][DR 1359] constexpr constructors require initialization of all union members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56582] ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56582 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/56307] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra Created a debug-only replacement for s

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-09 22:49:13 UTC --- So, this is probably a debug format issue. Will xfail.

[Bug c++/56582] ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56582 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/56551] A faster implementation of std::function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56551 malteskarupke at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||malteskarupke at web

[Bug c/56584] New: _int_free assertion failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584 Bug #: 56584 Summary: _int_free assertion failed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56585] New: Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 Bug #: 56585 Summary: Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/55146] jumptables with byte entries produce wrong code with -Os/-O2 for SH-1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55146 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 00:23:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) I think that your observation is correct. It looks the offset_unsigned field is handled wrongly somewhere on 4.7 and

[Bug c++/56567] [4.8 Regression] ICE with lambda return type deduction and braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56567 --- Comment #4 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2013-03-10 02:18:18 UTC --- Note, there is nothing in the Standard to prohibit return of an initializer_list value, so this rejects programs which are conformant. Unless/until #56568

[Bug target/56586] New: ARM vfpv3: Not using FPU (vsqrt op) for sqrt() / sqrtf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56586 Bug #: 56586 Summary: ARM vfpv3: Not using FPU (vsqrt op) for sqrt() / sqrtf() Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED