[Bug bootstrap/56258] Please upgrade doc/*.texi to the latest texinfo package(s)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258 --- Comment #11 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org 2013-03-10 08:06:54 UTC --- Please to find someone able to apply the above patches on branches 4.6 and 4.7?

[Bug target/56561] Miscompilation with -Os -arm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56561 Mike Hommey mh+gcc at glandium dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/48308] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Mike Hommey mh+gcc at glandium dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mh+gcc at

[Bug libstdc++/56587] New: [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56587 Bug #: 56587 Summary: [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c/56584] _int_free assertion failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-03-10 10:14:46 UTC --- I can't reproduce the error with vanilla gcc-4.7.2 running on Fedora 17/x86_64, either natively or in a cross to ARM Cortex-M3.

[Bug libstdc++/56587] [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56587 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-10 10:15:41 UTC --- This is before / after / irrespective of this change: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-03/msg00033.html ?

[Bug c++/56585] Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-10 10:25:27 UTC --- For the record, likewise current ICC. (by the way, you don't need a main in such a testcase, it's a dg-do compile anyway)

[Bug c++/56585] Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/56585] Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 --- Comment #3 from Fernando Pelliccioni fpelliccioni at gmail dot com 2013-03-10 11:21:59 UTC --- I don't see anything about diagnostic, I only see that the Standard says error I quote a relevant excerpt from the example. [ Example: /* ...

[Bug target/56508] [SH] Add support for rtv/n instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56508 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 12:08:24 UTC --- I've only looked briefly how this could be implemented. As far as I can see, there are two basic cases: 1) int test0 (int a, int b) { return a;

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 12:09:27 UTC --- I will apply this patch tomorrow, as obvious if nobody objects. The patch is also approved, with a test case. An annoying feature is that the

[Bug c++/56585] Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 12:41:42 UTC --- 1.3.6 [defns.diagnostic] and 1.4 [intro.compliance] p2

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 13:24:10 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 13:23:58 2013 New Revision: 196580 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196580 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An |[4.6/4.7

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/56293] Segfault when trying to access pass-by-reference value of a not-word-aligned REAL(16) / -fno-align-commons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56293 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug c/56572] GCC generates non-optimal transactional code when inlining nested transaction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572 Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/56560] [4.6/4.7 regression] vzeroupper clobbers argument with AVX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56560 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 15:51:03 UTC --- diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index c1f6c88..8005207 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++

[Bug ada/56588] New: gnatmake crash with incorrect SAL GPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56588 Bug #: 56588 Summary: gnatmake crash with incorrect SAL GPR Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug ada/56588] gnatmake crash with incorrect SAL GPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56588 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-03-10 16:03:19 UTC --- Created attachment 29635 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29635 Patch to fail build if the error is encountered

[Bug fortran/56581] seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 --- Comment #2 from Walt Brainerd walt.brainerd at gmail dot com 2013-03-10 16:03:37 UTC --- Sorry, I was trying lots of different experiments and apparently removed the ! before attaching the file. I put it back in and now cannot

[Bug c/56589] New: [4.8 regression] Array bounds violation is very end-user unfriendly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56589 Bug #: 56589 Summary: [4.8 regression] Array bounds violation is very end-user unfriendly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug fortran/56581] seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/56587] [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56587 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libstdc++/56587] [4.8 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check fails for powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56587 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56590] New: Replace auto-inc-dec pass with generic address mode selection pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56590 Bug #: 56590 Summary: Replace auto-inc-dec pass with generic address mode selection pass Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/56585] Cannot introduce a qualified type - Elaborated type specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585 --- Comment #5 from Fernando Pelliccioni fpelliccioni at gmail dot com 2013-03-10 17:17:58 UTC --- Maybe GCC behavior is correct. I thought, mistakenly, that the examples of the C++ Standard have normative meaning.

[Bug target/56546] Using the divide operator on unsigned int produces incorrect code on AVR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56546 --- Comment #2 from kpet at free dot fr 2013-03-10 17:23:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) AVR has no divide instruction and / 60 is performed by a multiplication and some adjustment. Thank you for this explanation. gcc-4.7.2,

[Bug target/54255] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-1.c (test for excess errors) fails on x86_64/i686 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54255 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug testsuite/54105] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-1.c (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54105 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/54407] FAIL: 30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc execution test program timed out on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-10 17:58:17 UTC --- Jack, I see at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-11/msg00331.html that you have tested a fix for this PR. I have tested that it

[Bug translation/56591] New: Missing space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56591 Bug #: 56591 Summary: Missing space Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 18:34:35 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 18:34:24 2013 New Revision: 196582 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196582 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul

[Bug fortran/56581] seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug fortran/56581] seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581 --- Comment #5 from Walt Brainerd walt.brainerd at gmail dot com 2013-03-10 19:39:42 UTC --- I think that is exactly what they were (wrote a little program to get rid of them). The files were produced by OCR and then edited (not by me),

[Bug target/53513] SH Target: Add support for fschg and fpchg insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 19:53:56 UTC --- Some related notes: According to the public documentation, the 'fschg' insn is only valid when FPSCR.PR = 0 on all FPU enabled cores (SH2A, SH4, SH4A).

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 20:14:57 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 20:14:48 2013 New Revision: 196583 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196583 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul

[Bug middle-end/56589] Array bounds violation is very end-user unfriendly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56589 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-10 21:02:52 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 21:02:44 2013 New Revision: 196584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196584 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul

[Bug tree-optimization/56576] wrong code for aliased union at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56576 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56577] wrong code for aliased union on gcc 4.7 only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56577 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56592] New: [SH] Add vector ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56592 Bug #: 56592 Summary: [SH] Add vector ABI Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/56293] Segfault when trying to access pass-by-reference value of a not-word-aligned REAL(16) / -fno-align-commons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56293 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 00:15:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) The question is also whether one can construct a fully standard-conform example which fails without -fno-align-commons – and

[Bug target/56347] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56347 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 00:44:33 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Mar 11 00:44:28 2013 New Revision: 196588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196588 Log: PR

[Bug target/40797] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4361

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40797 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 01:04:17 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Mar 11 01:04:13 2013 New Revision: 196590 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196590 Log: PR

[Bug debug/56307] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr55579.c scan-tree-dump esra Created a debug-only replacement for s

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 01:10:43 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Mar 11 01:10:38 2013 New Revision: 196591 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196591 Log: PR

[Bug testsuite/54119] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 01:18:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Mar 11 01:18:18 2013 New Revision: 196592 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196592 Log: PR

[Bug testsuite/54119] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-4.c scan-tree-dump-times gimple VEC_PERM_EXPR a, b, { 0, 4, 1, 5 }; 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54119 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56567] [4.8 Regression] ICE with lambda return type deduction and braced-init-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56567 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-11 03:21:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It's certainly legal to compile a function returning an std::initializer list, which is never called. So this fix is