[Bug tree-optimization/56635] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Target Miles

[Bug c/56635] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #9 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-17 04:42:39 UTC --- I have tried, but the small examples I've tried all work. And the code uses a library that I am not free to pass on. Probably you just have to call this unconfirmed and forget it

[Bug c++/54277] Template class member referred to with implicit this inside lambda is incorrectly const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:41:35 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:41:22 2013 New Revision: 196747 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196747 Log: PR c++/54277 * cp-tree.h (WILDC

[Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:40:06 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:39:51 2013 New Revision: 196746 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196746 Log: PR c++/55931 * parser.c (cp_par

[Bug c++/45917] inaccessible types allowed as template argument in nested-name-specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45917 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:39:39 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:39:22 2013 New Revision: 196744 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196744 Log: PR c++/45917 * parser.c (cp_par

[Bug c++/52374] [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into dependent base member access in lambda expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:39:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:39:04 2013 New Revision: 196743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196743 Log: PR c++/52374 * pt.c (tsubst_qua

[Bug c++/55972] cannot access private member from lambda used in NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55972 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:39:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:38:50 2013 New Revision: 196742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196742 Log: PR c++/54764 PR c++/55972

[Bug c++/54764] In class initialization of non-static lambda member can't be used in class with default template paramer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54764 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:39:05 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:38:50 2013 New Revision: 196742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196742 Log: PR c++/54764 PR c++/55972

[Bug c++/56039] ICE in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.c:1606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56039 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:38:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:38:35 2013 New Revision: 196741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196741 Log: PR c++/56039 * tree.c (strip_t

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:38:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:38:21 2013 New Revision: 196740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196740 Log: PR c++/54359 * parser.c (cp_par

[Bug c++/55357] -Wshadow warns about lambda function parameters matching variables in outer scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55357 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:38:16 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:38:01 2013 New Revision: 196739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196739 Log: PR c++/55357 * semantics.c (may

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:37:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:37:21 2013 New Revision: 196737 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196737 Log: PR c++/56481 * semantics.c (pot

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:37:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:37:09 2013 New Revision: 196736 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196736 Log: N3276 PR c++/52748 * cp-tr

[Bug c++/17232] classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232 --- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:36:54 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:36:40 2013 New Revision: 196734 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196734 Log: DR 337 PR c++/17232 * pt.

[Bug c++/54835] [C++11][DR 1518] Explicit default constructors not respected during copy-list-initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:36:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:36:08 2013 New Revision: 196732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196732 Log: DR 1518 PR c++/54835 * cal

[Bug c++/54946] ICE on template parameter from cast char-pointer in C++11 constexpr struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:36:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:35:50 2013 New Revision: 196731 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196731 Log: PR c++/54946 * pt.c (convert_no

[Bug c++/55532] Runtime segfault calling mutable lambda wrapped in a non-mutable lambda within a template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55532 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:35:35 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:35:18 2013 New Revision: 196729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196729 Log: PR c++/56447 PR c++/55532

[Bug c++/56447] [C++11] Lambda in template has conversion op it shouldn't have

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56447 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:35:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:35:18 2013 New Revision: 196729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196729 Log: PR c++/56447 PR c++/55532

[Bug c++/55017] [DR 1051] [C++11] Rvalue-reference member should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:35:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:35:01 2013 New Revision: 196728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196728 Log: PR c++/55017 * method.c (walk_f

[Bug c++/55240] [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:35:01 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:34:45 2013 New Revision: 196727 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196727 Log: PR c++/55240 * parser.c (parsin

[Bug c++/55241] [C++11] diagnostics show sizeof...(T) as sizeof(T...)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55241 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:34:45 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:34:31 2013 New Revision: 196726 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196726 Log: PR c++/55241 * error.c (dump_ex

[Bug c++/56238] [4.7 regression] ICE in tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_conversions, at cp/search.c:2515

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:34:17 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:34:03 2013 New Revision: 196724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196724 Log: PR c++/56238 * pt.c (fold_non_d

[Bug debug/49090] provide a way to recognize defaulted template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49090 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:33:59 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:33:50 2013 New Revision: 196723 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196723 Log: PR debug/49090 * dwarf2out.c (

[Bug c++/56095] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Crash casting function pointer as non-type template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56095 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 02:33:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 02:33:38 2013 New Revision: 196722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196722 Log: PR c++/56095 * class.c (resolv

[Bug c/56635] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2013-03-17 01:44:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29682 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29682 Preprocessed source Sorry, looks like it was too big. Here it is compressed.

[Bug fortran/56638] Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56638 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-16 23:46:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Fixed on trunk and 4.7 branch so far, the fix will also be done for 4.8.1 It's unusual for a bug to be fixed for a previous release and for trunk,

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-16 23:03:06 UTC --- > I was posting > in the hope that I might help someone in finding a compiler bug. And we do appreciate that very much. The problem is that without a self-contained examp

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #7 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-16 21:44:46 UTC --- As mentioned in my first post, I am compiling with -fcheck-bounds. The errors are occurring in a subroutine inside what at the moment is a main program. That subroutine has no ar

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-16 21:36:54 UTC --- > I don't mean to be argumentative, but I would like to ask: > Would an index out of bounds explain why single stepping over the statement > make it work, and would it ex

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #5 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-16 21:25:46 UTC --- I don't mean to be argumentative, but I would like to ask: Would an index out of bounds explain why single stepping over the statement make it work, and would it explain that a hig

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16 20:22:57 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Mar 16 20:22:40 2013 New Revision: 196711 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196711 Log: PR libstdc++/56468 * libsupc++

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [C++11] allow generic locks to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16 20:22:40 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Mar 16 20:22:30 2013 New Revision: 196710 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196710 Log: PR libstdc++/56002 * include/s

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16 20:01:27 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Mar 16 20:01:16 2013 New Revision: 196709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196709 Log: PR libstdc++/56468 * libsupc++

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [C++11] allow generic locks to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [C++11] allow generic locks to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16 19:46:07 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Mar 16 19:45:53 2013 New Revision: 196706 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196706 Log: PR libstdc++/56002 * include/s

[Bug fortran/56638] New: Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56638 Bug #: 56638 Summary: Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56607] [4.8/4.9 regression] GCC fails to warn on division by zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56607 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-16 19:35:48 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 16 19:35:41 2013 New Revision: 196704 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196704 Log: PR c++/56607 * typeck.c (cp_bui

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #3 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-16 18:46:06 UTC --- First some confusion. If I single step over the first statement it works properly. Once past that confusion, deleting both -floop-block and -floop-strip-mine from the make file it

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-16 18:16:10 UTC --- What happens if you don't use the graphite options '-floop-strip-mine -floop-block'? How big is your "small test case" and on which libraries does it depends?

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #1 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-16 18:02:49 UTC --- I realize this is not much help for a bug report. I can't get a small test case to fail, and if I change the optimization level it works. Also, I can't be sure whether the proble

[Bug c++/56633] Overload selection error for non-static data member initialization with initializer list in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Stat

[Bug c++/56636] strange interaction of dynamic_cast and unique_ptr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mingw --- Comment #1 from Jon

[Bug fortran/56637] New: Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 Bug #: 56637 Summary: Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1)) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/56636] New: strange interaction of dynamic_cast and unique_ptr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636 Bug #: 56636 Summary: strange interaction of dynamic_cast and unique_ptr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/56635] [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/56635] New: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635 Bug #: 56635 Summary: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in find_lattice_value, at tree-complex.c:15 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libgcc/56634] New: libgcc does not compile for 4.7.2: Yields internal compiler error: Bus error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56634 Bug #: 56634 Summary: libgcc does not compile for 4.7.2: Yields internal compiler error: Bus error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug c++/56633] New: Overload selection error for non-static data member initialization with initializer list in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633 Bug #: 56633 Summary: Overload selection error for non-static data member initialization with initializer list in template class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Versio

[Bug c/56569] When compiling the source insn does not satisfy its constraints:with CFlags as -mcfv4e

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56569 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/55943] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2013-03-16 13:19:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29680 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29680 Patch Oops, previous comment comment contained patch that I'm testing.

[Bug middle-end/55943] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ia64-*-*|ia64-*-*,hppa*64*-*-*

[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allocator64 at gmail dot

[Bug c++/56632] [C++0x] call mem func from lambda with captured "this" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from P

[Bug c++/56632] [C++0x] call mem func from lambda with captured "this" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56632 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/56632] [C++0x] call mem func from lambda with captured "this" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56632 --- Comment #1 from galuza 2013-03-16 12:18:40 UTC --- This bug is only in template class

[Bug libstdc++/56627] class hash instead of struct hash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627 --- Comment #6 from ahansson 2013-03-16 12:01:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm happy to fix things in libstdc++ that are broken and cause real problems > for clang users, but this is correct C++ and causes a spurious warning. Not

[Bug c++/56632] New: [C++0x] call mem func from lambda with captured "this" - internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56632 Bug #: 56632 Summary: [C++0x] call mem func from lambda with captured "this" - internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c/56600] loop goes indefinite when non-loop integer variable overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56600 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug sanitizer/56535] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/56631] duplicated sse code in switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56631 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Bilka 2013-03-16 11:36:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29678 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29678 testcase

[Bug other/56631] New: duplicated sse code in switch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56631 Bug #: 56631 Summary: duplicated sse code in switch Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

GCC needlessly saves Global Register Variables

I use Microchip's C30 compiler which, for all appearances, including Microchip's statements, is derived from the GCC. It does us the ld linker. Although, Microchip refuses to address my issue because they say that the following is a GCC issue. Using this syntax, I declare a global register variabl

[Bug sanitizer/56630] gcc's address-sanitizer uses 75% more memory than clang's on simple testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56630 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2013-03-16 10:30:51 UTC --- Looks like the sorting of a std::list container is mostly responsible: 168 list container(first, last); 169 container.sort(); When I run just with size 10 I

[Bug c++/56582] ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56582 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1

[Bug c++/56582] ICE on negative array index in C++11 constant expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56582 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-16 10:02:21 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Mar 16 10:02:11 2013 New Revision: 196701 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196701 Log: /cp 2013-03-16 Paolo Carlin

[Bug c++/55576] Fails to compile a call to template member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||talljimbo at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/56629] template struct confused with template member function of same name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56629 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/56627] class hash instead of struct hash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-16 09:40:02 UTC --- I agree. And we discussed it already somewhere.

[Bug target/56110] Sub-optimal code: unnecessary CMP after AND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56110 --- Comment #2 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2013-03-16 09:01:17 UTC --- Created attachment 29677 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29677 WIP patch I'm not really sure if this patch is good or bad. The discussion on the ML die

[Bug sanitizer/56630] gcc's address-sanitizer uses 75% more memory than clang's on simple testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56630 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2013-03-16 08:24:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29676 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29676 simple c++ std. container benchmark

[Bug sanitizer/56630] New: gcc's address-sanitizer uses 75% more memory than clang's on simple testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56630 Bug #: 56630 Summary: gcc's address-sanitizer uses 75% more memory than clang's on simple testcase Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/56628] "bootstrap-lto bootstrap-asan" / profiledbootstrap fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56628 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2013-03-16 08:08:09 UTC --- The "bootstrap-asan/profiledbootstrap" issue looks like dup of Bug 56535. And please ignore my remark about the huge size of SZ.

[Bug sanitizer/56535] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot