[Bug c++/56671] Gcc uses large amounts of memory and processor power with large C++11 bitsets

2013-03-21 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2013-03-21 08:31:57 UTC --- Created attachment 29703 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29703 callgraph Looks like a bug in constant expression

[Bug c++/56672] New: Bad optimization

2013-03-21 Thread nroets at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672 Bug #: 56672 Summary: Bad optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56673] New: multi-versioning not GC safe

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673 Bug #: 56673 Summary: multi-versioning not GC safe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/56672] Bad optimization

2013-03-21 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-03-21 09:21:59 UTC --- A program that depends on undefined behaviour cannot be correct.

[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'

2013-03-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'

2013-03-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-21 09:40:13 UTC --- Fixed for good.

[Bug c++/56672] Bad optimization

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/36996] Bad optimization

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36996 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 09:59:24 UTC --- *** Bug 56672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/56674] New: ICE in check_sym_interfaces

2013-03-21 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
/install --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins --enable-lto --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /data/vjoost/gnu

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

2013-03-21 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/56675] New: I/O: Check edit descriptors with READ/WRITE used in FORMAT statements

2013-03-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56675 Bug #: 56675 Summary: I/O: Check edit descriptors with READ/WRITE used in FORMAT statements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3

[Bug target/56676] New: unnecesary splitted load when using avx2

2013-03-21 Thread neleai at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 Bug #: 56676 Summary: unnecesary splitted load when using avx2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/56677] New: [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

2013-03-21 Thread npl at chello dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 Bug #: 56677 Summary: [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

2013-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 13:17:15 UTC --- This is because ratio_divide is a struct, as required by earlier C++0x drafts, not an alias template as required by the final standard. It's already

[Bug target/56676] unnecesary splitted load when using avx2

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 13:30:42 UTC --- I believe we split unaligned loads by default because that's faster for generic tuning.

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

2013-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

2013-03-21 Thread npl at chello dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 --- Comment #3 from npl at chello dot at 2013-03-21 14:38:48 UTC --- Thanks, this did not occur to me. Still, wouldnt it be relatively easy to adopt the __is_ratio function to check for the ::type instead?

[Bug fortran/56674] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in check_sym_interfaces

2013-03-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/56676] unnecesary splitted load when using avx2

2013-03-21 Thread neleai at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Bilka neleai at seznam dot cz 2013-03-21 14:53:26 UTC --- On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:30:42PM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 --- Comment

[Bug target/56676] unnecesary splitted load when using avx2

2013-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 15:11:14 UTC --- Well, while true we don't adjust tuning based on that. Use -march=core-avx2 instead.

[Bug libstdc++/56678] New: [c++11] non-uglified name in chrono

2013-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56678 Bug #: 56678 Summary: [c++11] non-uglified name in chrono Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug target/56676] unnecesary splitted load when using avx2

2013-03-21 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56679] New: [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template parameter pack

2013-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679 Bug #: 56679 Summary: [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template parameter pack Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status:

[Bug middle-end/56680] New: ICE for spec2K's 178.galgel and 200.sixtrack for x86_64 at O3

2013-03-21 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56680 Bug #: 56680 Summary: ICE for spec2K's 178.galgel and 200.sixtrack for x86_64 at O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

2013-03-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 15:35:46 UTC --- That wouldn't help. The requirement is that the Period template argument is a ratio. In GCC 4.7 ratio_divide is not a ratio. Whether ratio_divide::type

[Bug middle-end/56681] New: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1008

2013-03-21 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O3' '-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/f951 bug.f90 -quiet -dumpbase bug.f90 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase bug -O3

[Bug fortran/49802] [F2003, F2008] Wrong code with VALUE, F2008: VALUE with arrays/DIMENSION

2013-03-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49802 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/56681] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1008

2013-03-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/56682] New: -fsanitize documentation

2013-03-21 Thread edwin+gccbugs at etorok dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 Bug #: 56682 Summary: -fsanitize documentation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/56681] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1008

2013-03-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-21 17:56:41 UTC --- If I am not mistaken, this PR seems to have been fixed between revisions 196859 (broken) and 196877 (OK).

[Bug fortran/35203] OPTIONAL, VALUE actual argument cannot be an INTEGER 0

2013-03-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug middle-end/36282] Spurious warning asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

2013-03-21 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36282 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/56683] New: Function types with different language linkages not distinct

2013-03-21 Thread jed at 59A2 dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683 Bug #: 56683 Summary: Function types with different language linkages not distinct Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56683] Function types with different language linkages not distinct

2013-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

2013-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jed at

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

2013-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 20:02:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 21 17:36:47 2013 New Revision: 196887 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196887root=gccview=rev Log: PR

[Bug debug/55608] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Debug info quality regressions with file scope vars

2013-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-21 20:03:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 21 17:35:39 2013 New Revision: 196886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196886root=gccview=rev Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/39326] Segmentation fault with -O1, out of memory with -O2

2013-03-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/56684] New: [4.8 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'T' of kind template_parm_index

2013-03-21 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684 Bug #: 56684 Summary: [4.8 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'T' of kind template_parm_index Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/56684] [4.9 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'T' of kind template_parm_index

2013-03-21 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/56305] passing array of character with len1 to c_loc

2013-03-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56685] New: default template parameter cannot precede a non-default template parameter in a function

2013-03-21 Thread gessos.paul at yahoo dot gr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56685 Bug #: 56685 Summary: default template parameter cannot precede a non-default template parameter in a function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c/56686] New: gcc cannot find include header file

2013-03-21 Thread panruochen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 Bug #: 56686 Summary: gcc cannot find include header file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/56686] gcc cannot find include header file

2013-03-21 Thread panruochen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 --- Comment #1 from Pan Ruochen panruochen at gmail dot com 2013-03-22 02:18:58 UTC --- Created attachment 29706 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29706 testcase Testcase for this bug

[Bug preprocessor/56686] gcc cannot find include header file

2013-03-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c