[Bug fortran/55591] strict-aliasing & Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele 2013-03-29 06:13:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Untested (but successfully compiled) patch: > > --- a/gcc/fortran/options.c > +++ b/gcc/fortran/options.c > @@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ gfc_init_opti

[Bug target/56726] i386: MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is too small (usually)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 --- Comment #6 from Chip Salzenberg 2013-03-29 06:05:19 UTC --- May I have this accepted?

[Bug lto/56775] New: -flto and -fprofile-generate together result in a link-time internal compiler error (in "add_symbol_to_partition")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56775 Bug #: 56775 Summary: -flto and -fprofile-generate together result in a link-time internal compiler error (in "add_symbol_to_partition") Classification: Unclassified

[Bug other/56755] Global symbol demangling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56755 --- Comment #3 from bryan 2013-03-29 02:32:20 UTC --- let me provide more details about this bug. I got all of my program's function names from compiler and wanted to demangle them. C++filt successfully demangled almost all of the names,

[Bug c++/56772] placement new operator does not work inside function template for array types.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56772 --- Comment #2 from meng at g dot clemson.edu 2013-03-29 00:45:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I see a sorry message thus the issue seems known. I agree. What confused me was that the feature is not unimplemented, it worked well for

[Bug c++/52748] [4.9 Regression][C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #13 from Michel Morin 2013-03-29 00:40:59 UTC --- Thanks Jason, Paolo. I'll enable N3276 decltype support in Boost.Config for gcc 4.8.1 and 4.9.0.

[Bug c++/56774] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774 --- Comment #4 from Shane 2013-03-29 00:21:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > We badly need a reduced testcase not using the whole (not to mention > of course) Here's a more reduced test case. template struct mytype {}; tem

[Bug c++/56774] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56774] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774 Daniel Frey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.frey at gmx dot de --- Comment

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-28 23:58:04 UTC --- I see.

[Bug c++/56774] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56772] placement new operator does not work inside function template for array types.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56772 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|meng at g dot clemson.edu | --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carl

[Bug c++/56728] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE using constexpr initialization and arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45159] Unnecessary temporaries

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/41115] Tree-vectorizer: VecCost tuning for X2: Without vectorization 30% faster

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/56765] [OOP] compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug gcov-profile/56773] Programs crash if compiled with --coverage, although they run correctly without --coverage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56773 peter.hans.froehlich at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.hans.

[Bug c++/56774] New: G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774 Bug #: 56774 Summary: G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/56773] Programs crash if compiled with --coverage, although they run correctly without --coverage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56773 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-28 21:14:28 UTC --- open is the name of the standard C function open. --coverage uses a library which calls the open function; this causes the crash. I think you are exposing undefined behavior.

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-28 21:13:15 UTC --- It isn't a library issue, in libstdc++ it is just ICE internal compiler error: in sra_ipa_reset_debug_stmts, at tree-sra.c:4681 in all the libstdc++ testcases that regressed be

[Bug gcov-profile/56773] New: Programs crash if compiled with --coverage, although they run correctly without --coverage

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56773 Bug #: 56773 Summary: Programs crash if compiled with --coverage, although they run correctly without --coverage Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c++/56772] New: placement new operator does not work inside function template.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56772 Bug #: 56772 Summary: placement new operator does not work inside function template. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/56679] [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-28 20:13:17 UTC --- Indeed. Thanks again!

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:12:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29748 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29748 Full build log In case there is something useful in the build log. Host: CentOS 6.4.

[Bug target/56771] Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:10:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29747 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29747 Preprocessed code that fails to build I don't think this code is in error. At least I don't

[Bug target/56771] New: Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771 Bug #: 56771 Summary: Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56710] Using reserved double underscore variable name in a lambda causes internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56710 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56701] [C++11] The *this* pointer fails to bind to rvalue reference to pointer type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56679] [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template parameter pack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/52748] [4.9 Regression][C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56770] New: Partial sums loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770 Bug #: 56770 Summary: Partial sums loop optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pri

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/56769] New: [4.7] ICE in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:2511

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56769 Bug #: 56769 Summary: [4.7] ICE in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:2511 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56765] [OOP] compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords

[Bug c++/56768] New: [4.7] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56768 Bug #: 56768 Summary: [4.7] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug plugins/56754] some missing plugin headers during installation in gcc 4.8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug c/56767] gcc does not generate correct code with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 17:39:38 UTC --- GCC clearly warns you about this: x.c: In function ‘round2’: x.c:10:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] This is why before creating the bug repor

[Bug c/56767] gcc does not generate correct code with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/56767] New: gcc does not generate correct code with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56767 Bug #: 56767 Summary: gcc does not generate correct code with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 17:19:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > But the function actually IS defined, No it isn't! Please read my answer again carefully. The function that gets called is template void

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #10 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 16:50:06 UTC --- But the function actually IS defined, because the call func(foo,b) works. Yes it is not defined early enough maybe. But the linker is run after the compiler. Ho

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-28 16:11:31 UTC --- Cool, thanks guys for working on this. I hope the library issues aren't too serious.

[Bug c++/56725] extra spaces in error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56725 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53631] [C++11] is unimplemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631 Balakrishnan B changed: What|Removed |Added CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail

[Bug c++/15672] local function causes weird warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npl at chello dot at --- Comm

[Bug c++/56762] too aggressive optimization or missing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/15672] local function causes weird warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 15:13:08 UTC --- Clang diagnoses the most vexing parse, comment 5 gets: sf.cc:7:7: warning: parentheses were disambiguated as a function declaration [-Wvexing-parse] g1 f(t(c)); ^

[Bug rtl-optimization/56766] New: Fails to combine (vec_select (vec_concat ...)) to (vec_merge ...)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56766 Bug #: 56766 Summary: Fails to combine (vec_select (vec_concat ...)) to (vec_merge ...) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNC

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-28 14:09:01 UTC --- Created attachment 29746 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29746 gcc49-pr34949-2.patch Another needed patch, without which DSE wouldn't really delete the u

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-28 14:07:42 UTC --- Created attachment 29745 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29745 gcc49-pr34949-1.patch Incremental patch, passed bootstrap together with the later jason's

[Bug c++/52748] [4.9 Regression][C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-28 13:46:02 UTC --- Thanks Jason. Looks like to be safe we should also add Nathan's testcase as-is to the testsuite.

[Bug fortran/56765] New: compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765 Bug #: 56765 Summary: compilation errors/ICE with unlimited polymorphic array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56762] too aggressive optimization or missing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762 --- Comment #2 from npl at chello dot at 2013-03-28 13:38:01 UTC --- Oh how I hate this rule. Thanks for the info and sorry for the invalid report.

[Bug c++/52748] [4.9 Regression][C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-28 13:36:07 UTC --- The implementation is complete. Unfortunately, my fixes for DRs 337 and 657 are interfering with the desired result; creating a function type returning an abstract class cause

[Bug c++/52748] [4.9 Regression][C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXE

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56764] vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list not smart enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52748] [C++11] N3276 changes to decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Michel Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mimomorin at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/56764] New: vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list not smart enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56764 Bug #: 56764 Summary: vect_prune_runtime_alias_test_list not smart enough Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: misse

[Bug c++/56763] New: "attribute ignored in declaration of " warning points to wrong place

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56763 Bug #: 56763 Summary: "attribute ignored in declaration of " warning points to wrong place Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status

[Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NE

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2013-03-28 12:42:17 UTC --- Created attachment 29744 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29744 patch This patch makes us not rely on a dominator walk to magically get us process stmts

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9 Regression] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #31 from Martin Jambor 2013-03-28 12:36:36 UTC --- The 4.8 workaround has been reverted yesterday with the commit below so the bug should be alive and kicking again. Author: jamborm Date: Wed Mar 27 14:06:58 2013 New Revisi

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2013-03-28 12:34:24 UTC --- Ok, so one reason is that we simply "ignore" dependencies when computing what stmts to move (which happens in the same processing order): static bool add_dependency (tree de

[Bug c++/56762] too aggressive optimization or missing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug tree-optimization/56695] [4.9 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:6751

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56695] [4.9 Regression] ICE in expand_vec_cond_expr, at optabs.c:6751

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56695 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28 11:15:20 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Mar 28 11:14:44 2013 New Revision: 197192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197192&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/56695 * tree-v

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 11:05:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I read the section on name lookup changes at > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html > > but it talks about a different kind of problem. Con

[Bug c++/56746] [4.8 regression] increased memory usage when compiling C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746 --- Comment #7 from Mathias Gaunard 2013-03-28 10:39:53 UTC --- Using either -save-temps or -ftrack-macro-expansion=0-ftrack-macro-expansion=0 removes the memory hog. Compiling the preprocessed source does not cause increased memory usage.

[Bug c++/56762] New: too aggressive optimization or missing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56762 Bug #: 56762 Summary: too aggressive optimization or missing warnings Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-28 10:26:48 UTC --- On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 > > --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28 10:11:55 UTC --- FWIW, started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=196769

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-28 10:07:29 UTC --- On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 > > --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28

[Bug libfortran/56737] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong I/O result with format cache for Hollerith strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #8 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 09:55:49 UTC --- I read the section on name lookup changes at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html but it talks about a different kind of problem. Consider that there the

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28 09:54:58 UTC --- It seems that move_computations_stmt firstly inserts into bb 11 # VUSE <.MEM_21> D__lsm.5 = *_17; and then # VUSE <.MEM_21> _17 = *q_8(D); move_computations then commits t

[Bug c++/56746] [4.8 regression] increased memory usage when compiling C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/56761] Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 09:16:52 UTC --- Read the section on name lookup changes at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

[Bug c++/56761] Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-28 09:12:15 UTC --- There is no header in standard C++, so any code written in the last 15 years should not try to use it.

[Bug c/19449] __builtin_constant_p cannot resolve to const when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-28 08:53:54 UTC --- Created attachment 29742 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29742 gcc49-pr19449.patch Untested patch. There is another case where we'd better fold __builti

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #6 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 08:27:34 UTC --- let me paste "v3 source code" that is also added as attachment: namespace nam { class binbuffer {}; } template void func (const T &a, nam::binbuffer &b);

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #5 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 08:22:19 UTC --- Created attachment 29741 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29741 v3 source code

[Bug c++/56761] Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-28 07:58:29 UTC --- Where did you grab the prebuilt binraries from? gcc.gnu.org does not support prebuilt binraries really.

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #4 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:58:00 UTC --- The example is reduced very much. Actually I have a module for "holder" and one for "contain" (separate compilation units). They do not know about each other. I

[Bug c++/56761] New: Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56761 Bug #: 56761 Summary: Error: CreateProcess: No such file or directory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28 07:38:04 UTC --- Something goes wrong in LIM.

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56756] ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block n follows the use !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56756 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #2 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:05:22 UTC --- You see attached two files. v1.cpp and v2.cpp g++ --version g++ (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free softwar

[Bug c++/56760] namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 --- Comment #1 from erik.thi...@thiele-hydraulik.de 2013-03-28 07:01:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29740 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29740 v2 source code

[Bug c++/56760] New: namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56760 Bug #: 56760 Summary: namespaces, templates and forwarding declarations. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal