http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56798
--- Comment #3 from Vincent 2013-04-01 03:54:17 UTC
---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=197234
bash-4.1$ /home/slave/build/gcc/bld_gcc/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/slave/build/gcc/bld_gcc/./gcc -no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56798
--- Comment #2 from Vincent 2013-04-01 03:18:17 UTC
---
started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=197266
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56798
--- Comment #1 from Vincent 2013-04-01 00:35:55 UTC
---
Created attachment 29763
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29763
preprocessed sources
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-01
00:05:14 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 31 20:32:33 2013
New Revision: 197290
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-31 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56798
Bug #: 56798
Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1238
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
Bug #: 56797
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2150
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56796
Bug #: 56796
Summary: ‘TARGET_CYGWIN64’ was not declared in this scope
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56795
Bug #: 56795
Summary: gimple_seq_alloc and gimple_seq_free are still present
in gcc-4.8's gimple.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
--- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-31
21:51:44 UTC ---
> Was there a problem the other bug report about this?
Not that I can see. That other report was just a duplicate coming a
few days later.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56784
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-31
21:50:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 56784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754
--- Comment #4 from Magnus Granberg 2013-03-31
21:33:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29761
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29761
This patch readd TARGET_H to PLUGIN_HEADERS
This patch is posted on gcc-patch ml and on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56794
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-unknown-freebsd*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56794
Bug #: 56794
Summary: C++11 Error in range-based for with parameter pack
array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56731
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] ICE on |[4.7 Regression] [OOP] I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55487
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2013-03-31
20:13:43 UTC ---
Think this must be a RTL sharing problem. The note kind changes somewhere
in the jump pass from NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL to NOTE_INSN_DELETED_DEBUG_LABEL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-31
20:08:22 UTC ---
I guess it is really complaining about the lack of inline modifier.
__attribute__((__always_inline__)) bool
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag* __a,
memory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56731
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on (wrongly)|[4.7 Regression] ICE on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.l.cantrell at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-31 17:35:13 UTC ---
Btw, this bug does not require unlimited polymorphism, but also shows up with
normal ('limited'?) CLASS definitions:
program t_limited
implicit none
type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55487
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2013-03-31
16:41:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29760
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29760
Preprocessed source
Can be reproduced on i686-apple-darwin9:
-fpreprocessed pr51447.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55487
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2013-03-31
15:43:31 UTC ---
Problem is note kind is NOTE_INSN_DELETED_DEBUG_LABEL. It probably should be
NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56793
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56793
Bug #: 56793
Summary: gcc -std=c++11 craps out with enum class syntax.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56792
Bug #: 56792
Summary: AVR, internal compiler error on build avr-libc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Jordan Ads jordanads2...@gmail.com has added you to the jordanads2029 group
with this message:
The group's name, description, and address will automatically be included in
the email.
Here is the group's description:
Jordan Ads for Advertising And Marketing
Email: jordanads2...@gmail.com
Mo
28 matches
Mail list logo