http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57131
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57131
Bug #: 57131
Summary: Wong register assignment?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law 2013-05-01 05:13:38
UTC ---
__attribute__ ((noinline))
foo(short unsigned int *p1, short unsigned int *p2)
{
short unsigned int x1, x4;
int x2, x3, x5, x6;
unsigned int x7;
x1 = *p1;
x2 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Bug #: 57130
Summary: Incorrect "and --> extract" conversion in combine
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|VERI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
jb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #8 from jb 2013-04-3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #7 from jb 2013-04-30 22:22:44 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > It seems to me that the option "free-nonheap-object" does not work in gcc.
>
> You need to add -O2 (maybe -O1 is enough, sometimes you ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-30 22:07:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It seems to me that the option "free-nonheap-object" does not work in gcc.
You need to add -O2 (maybe -O1 is enough, sometimes you need -O3), otherwis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-30
21:57:28 UTC ---
For the test case in comment 0:
__builtin_memset (y._data.base_addr, 0, 4);
y._data.rank = 1;
y._data.type = -1;
y._data.dim[0].lower_bound = 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #5 from jb 2013-04-30 21:57:00 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> gcc has -Wfree-nonheap-object, which works for free but not for delete or
> delete[]. Extending it to these functions seems like a reasonable RFE.
I agree wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
Bug #: 57129
Summary: ICE (segfault) in check_extended_derived_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-30
21:46:11 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Apr 30 21:45:13 2013
New Revision: 198476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-30 Thomas Koenig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-30
21:44:37 UTC ---
I thought the following would work. While it does so for the test cases, it
causes new failures. In principle, not elem_len but "dim[0].sm" is the correct
value - assuming, it i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57128
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-30 21:10:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Removing the -std=f2003 or putting the module into the same file as the
> subroutine makes the auto-deallocation (and nullification) go away.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57127
--- Comment #2 from AstroFloyd 2013-04-30
20:57:55 UTC ---
Hmmm, this looks very strongly like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370 but is not identical(?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57128
Bug #: 57128
Summary: gcc-gnat problem halts gcc build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law 2013-04-30 19:20:19
UTC ---
It looks like range_fits_type_p may not be handling overflows correctly.
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-30 18:37:41
UTC ---
gcc has -Wfree-nonheap-object, which works for free but not for delete or
delete[]. Extending it to these functions seems like a reasonable RFE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57127
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57127
Bug #: 57127
Summary: gfortran gives unintended warning on uninitialized
optional dummy array of undetermined size
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-30
16:51:05 UTC ---
Fortran 2008, "16.5.1.4 Host association" has:
"If an entity that is accessed by use association has the same nongeneric name
as a host entity, the host entity is inaccessible
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-30
16:39:38 UTC ---
Reduced test for RESHAPE:
implicit none
type :: ti
end type
class(ti), allocatable :: x(:,:), z(:)
allocate(z(9), source=reshape(x, (/ 9 /)))
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57126
Bug #: 57126
Summary: Wrongly rejects a generic call because it doesn't
match the intrinsic while another specific matches
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57091
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #13 from Dongsheng Song
2013-04-30 14:46:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hmm, I don't see in config.log any difference to the variant I have built on
> my
> box. Shared is actual enabled in you config.log for libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-30 13:49:25
UTC ---
Hmm, I don't see in config.log any difference to the variant I have built on my
box. Shared is actual enabled in you config.log for libstdc++-v3. So DLL
should be built, if you d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-30
13:40:27 UTC ---
Reduced test for gfortran.dg/proc_decl_23.f90
module m_string
type t_string
procedure(string_to_char), pointer, nopass :: char3 ! segfault
end type t_string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-30 13:34:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll export the following symbos:
>
> [Ordinal/Name Pointer] Table
> [ 0] _Unwind_Backtrace
> [ 1] _Unwind_DeleteEx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-30
12:35:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > Currently, we do not support assigning values to variables
> > and then later using the values for dependency analysis.
> > ...
Well, as I wrote
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
Bug #: 57125
Summary: Build not SMP safe; fails to build bconfig.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
brett davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dparker1324 at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
Bug #: 57124
Summary: 254.gap@spec2000 got miscompare after r198413
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57117
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-30
12:15:00 UTC ---
> Currently, we do not support assigning values to variables
> and then later using the values for dependency analysis.
> ...
What about
integer :: r(10)
r = [(i+1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57116
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57123
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56732
enrico.scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57122
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-30
12:05:15 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=198333 aka
loops preservation patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
--- Comment #4 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
11:53:35 UTC ---
libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll export the following symbos:
[Ordinal/Name Pointer] Table
[ 0] _Unwind_Backtrace
[ 1] _Unwind_DeleteException
[ 2] _Unwind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57122
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57123
Bug #: 57123
Summary: code compiled and linked with -fopenmp does not load
the correct omp library at run-time
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #11 from Dongsheng Song
2013-04-30 11:43:42 UTC ---
Please see gcc/config-v2.log and i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config-v2.log,
still not build libstdc++-6.dll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-30
11:42:49 UTC ---
Reduced test for gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90
module m
implicit none
contains
pure function str_vs(vs) result(s)
character, dimension(:), intent(in)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #10 from Dongsheng Song
2013-04-30 11:42:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 29982
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29982
i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config-v2.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #9 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
11:41:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29981
gcc/config-v2.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57090
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57090
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-30
11:35:06 UTC ---
*** Bug 57095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57095
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #8 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
11:29:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hmm, only issue I see is the use of '--disable-nls' option, which is known to
> cause issue. See here PR 54659.
>
> Another question I have is, wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57105
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
Dongsheng Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
Dongsheng Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #5 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
10:46:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, I can't reproduce that. I just built things myself again for 4.8.1 gcc.
> I am a bit curious to read that due distributions like Fedora seem to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #4 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
10:44:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 29980
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29980
gcc/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57120
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
--- Comment #3 from Dongsheng Song 2013-04-30
10:42:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 29979
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29979
x86_64-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-04-30
09:54:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 29978
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29978
Override @smallexample attributes
The attached patch overrides the default @smallexample a
: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
Using GCC 4.9.0 as of 20130430 :
$ cat latch.c
unsigned a;
int b, c;
void f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57119
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
--- Comment #1 from Netra
2013-04-30 08:35:07 UTC ---
adding on to my previous comment,
running on RHEL 5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
Netra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
Bug #: 57121
Summary: undefined reference to gcov_merge_init and
gcov_merge_add
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
85 matches
Mail list logo
