http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479
--- Comment #3 from bccheng at android dot com ---
Here is my configuration:
--target=arm-linux-androideabi --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
--- Comment #10 from Sandra Loosemore ---
I'm working on a new patch that addresses the first problem, the failure in
test().
I think the second failure is not in test1() at all, and has nothing to do with
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields. Looks to m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #5 from asmwarrior ---
> p /r m_Headers
[debug]> p /r m_Headers
[debug]$5 = (StringSet &) @0x116d0bc4: {_M_t = {_M_impl =
{ >> =
{<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator >> = {}, }, _M_key_compare = {> = {}, }, _M_header = {_M_color
= std::_S_red,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #4 from asmwarrior ---
This is what I get when I enable the python stack print:
> set python print-stack full
[debug]> set python print-stack full
[debug]>>cb_gdb:
> p m_Headers
[debug]> p m_Headers
[debug]Traceback (most recen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
asmwarrior changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asmwarrior at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57419
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57506
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57506
Bug ID: 57506
Summary: [avr] Some devices are present twice in avr-mcus.def
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 30246
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30246&action=edit
cecky2.s: Addembler dump with -dP from 4.8.0 (experimental) 2013-03-06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 30245
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30245&action=edit
cecky2.c: More test case
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> I thought this was fixed for 4.8 by bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler ---
This is fixed in gcc 4.9 trunk and I believe it has already been fixed in gcc
4.8 due to bug #50043.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
--- Comment #1 from Frank Heckenbach ---
Created attachment 30244
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30244&action=edit
Test case for enable_shared_from_this
The same applies to std::enable_shared_from_this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I thought this was fixed for 4.8 by bug 54295.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57505
Bug ID: 57505
Summary: [C++11] destructor of std::function should be noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57502
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504
Bug ID: 57504
Summary: invalid this pointer passed in call to virtual
function that returns a struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1)
> Created attachment 30242 [details]
> .expand dump
>
> Notice that in rot(), long D.1484_5 is unused and instead the 32-bit value
> D.1482_3 is used.
16-bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Bug ID: 57503
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply
routine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Seems to have been fixed with the "Symtab cleanups 2/17 - merge alias code" fix
(r199577) or possibly with the same fix as for PR57467 (r199582).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51571
Guillaume Melquiond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillaume.melquiond at inria
dot f
26 matches
Mail list logo
