[Bug middle-end/54582] gap in FORTIFY checking of buffer lengths

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582 --- Comment #16 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 30287 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30287&action=edit C++ source code Latest version understands NUM1.NUM2, 53 formatting specifiers and a bunch of prefixes like %#

[Bug target/56739] FreeBSD ia64: gcc49/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/include/mutex:781:41: internl compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56739 Anton Shterenlikht changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Good to be assigned. I posted the patch Jason, can you please look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00433.html Honza

[Bug target/57578] SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57578 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/57578] SPE detection broken on Linux (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57578 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57579] Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/57582] New: clone is effectively reserved by and should not be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57582 Bug ID: 57582 Summary: clone is effectively reserved by and should not be Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/57579] Problem with vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57579 --- Comment #3 from Federico Carminati --- Hello Richard, thanks a lot!! I would have never figured this out by myself. However let me repeat my question, is there a place where this can be learnt without relying on kind (and knowledgeable) sou

[Bug libstdc++/57582] clone is effectively reserved by and should not be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57582 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nmm1 at cam dot ac.uk --- Comment #16 fro

[Bug libstdc++/57049] std::swap does self move assignment, which is illegal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57049 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/56677] [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results doesnt verify as __is_ratio

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/56430] In __airy: return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56430 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- What happened to this issue?

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8 at revision 199935, I get the following failures for the tests added at revision 199898: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr56564-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "&s" 1 FAIL: gcc.ta

[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #16) > On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8 at revision 199935, I get the following failures > for the tests added at revision 199898: > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr56564-1

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #17 from Nick Maclaren --- I will just add to comment 8 that dumping large chunks of the POSIX namespace in isn't legal, unless WG21 have completely lost their marbles :-) But, as people have said, this isn't fixable by hacking - not

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- Comment 8 is only referring to et al putting standard C names in the global namespace as well as in namespace std, which is legal. We all agree it's not legal to also put names that aren't from ISO C (e.g.

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18) > Comment 8 is only referring to et al putting standard C names in > the global namespace as well as in namespace std, which is legal. We all > agree it's not l

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > Has anyone checked recently what exactly we still need -D_GNU_SOURCE for in > the public headers (as opposed to just the libstdc++ code), as compared to > say

[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57583] New: large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 Bug ID: 57583 Summary: large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Prio

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > > Has anyone checked recently what exactly we still need -D_GNU_SOURCE for in > > the public headers (as opposed

[Bug c/57584] New: ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Bug ID: 57584 Summary: ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/30604] Unable to coalesce ssa_names and which are marked as MUST COALESCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 --- Comment #17 from David Binderman --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16) > Can you open a new bugreport please? It's very likely a different > reason than this one. After a lot of fiddling about, please see #57584 Redhat packag

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini --- If I remember correctly, the gthr.h included by ext/atomicity.h is also a big issue. If we switch to a non-reference-counted basic_string we can make progress but another usage is in , global locale & co.

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Apparently GAS has lost its BROKEN_DOT_WORD handing.

[Bug libstdc++/57585] New: New --enable-clocale model using POSIX 2008

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57585 Bug ID: 57585 Summary: New --enable-clocale model using POSIX 2008 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: l

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, perhaps this is solveable only through cooperation with glibc folks. I guess a start for that would be to do an audit of the libstdc++ headers, what symbols does it need from the glibc headers, and catego

[Bug c++/53096] [DR 1333] [c++11] should be possible to default a copy ctor that takes non-const arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53096 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > changed, the question would be what should be the new G++ feature test macro > defaults, for -std=gnu++{98,11,1y} I guess it should include the POSIX etc. > st

[Bug rtl-optimization/57430] Redundant move instruction is produced after function inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57430 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- I have not seen any comments about my latest note - have you any ideas about this issue? Thanks ahead.

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #25 from Nick Maclaren --- Strictly, don't you mean feature selection macros? It isn't worth being too perfectionist on this, as the standards (both de jure and de facto) are an ungodly mess, and it is getting steadily harder to write

[Bug libstdc++/51749] Including pollutes global namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- No, I mean what I wrote, see http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html info libc 'Feature Test Macros' etc.

[Bug target/50807] [avr] Constructor writing to RAM for variable in Flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann L

[Bug preprocessor/57580] Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/57358] segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug tree-optimization/57358] segmentation fault with attribute(optimize(O0))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57358 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson --- is the corresponding binutils/gas bug.

[Bug c/57584] ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |c++ --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann L

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > Jason, can you please look at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00433.html I approved it the same day you posted it. :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/57569] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code for struct copy at -O3 on x86_64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57569 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz --- It's cse, and it's because it indeed uses the wrong dependence test. The CSE tables holds values read from memory which are supposed to be clobbered by following writes, i.e. write-after-read, which has to use

[Bug target/57586] New: ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 Bug ID: 57586 Summary: ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #1 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- A bisect shows that this bug first occurs after r197095: 2013-03-26 Richard Biener * emit-rtl.c (set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos): Remove alignment computations and rel

[Bug c/57587] New: RFE: 'maybenull' attribute.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57587 Bug ID: 57587 Summary: RFE: 'maybenull' attribute. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug c/57584] ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57581] abi_tag vs. demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57581 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to comment #17) > Yeah, MachO is broken by design, guess the tests need to be restricted > to non-darwin non-PE. Questions: (1) What is PE? (2) Is the second "return 0;" wrong code or valid

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30293 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30293&action=edit Less reduced failing testcase Yes, the same thing happens for packed versions of those structs. P

[Bug fortran/43412] [OOP] BT_CLASS does not does not set array spec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43412 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 Bug 18918 depends on bug 43412, which changed state. Bug 43412 Summary: [OOP] BT_CLASS does not does not set array spec http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43412 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jun 11 14:58:55 2013 New Revision: 199958 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199958&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-06-11 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/57535 * trans-array

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- The mingw/cygwin stuff. The testcases assume that the symbols have decl_binds_to_current_def_p false, if that isn't the case (because darwin/mingw apparently don't allow symbol interposition), then the testc

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 > > --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Created attachment 30293

[Bug c++/50390] gcc hangs while compiling invalid c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/50436] Crash or hang on invalid template code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52143] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic function result in gfc_class_vptr_get

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52143 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- It looks like a duplicate of pr57535.

[Bug fortran/57305] ICE with warnings and unlimited polymorphic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49074] [OOP] Defined assignment w/ CLASS arrays: Incomplete error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Jun 11 16:18:13 2013 New Revision: 199961 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199961&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-06-11 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/57508 * resolve.c (

[Bug fortran/57508] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Intrinsic assignment+defined-assignment for comps: PROCEDURE attribute of '_F.DA0' conflicts with VARIABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57508 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Fixed on the GCC 4.8 branch. Patch pending for the trunk, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00064.html

[Bug c++/57588] New: [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 Bug ID: 57588 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Isn't this just http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition ?

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Although shouldn't it fail to compile, due to private destructor and copy constructor?

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug fortran/56939] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used before it is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/52143] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic function result in gfc_class_vptr_get

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52143 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57535] [OOP] ICE when allocating a CLASS function-result variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57535 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 52143 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/56939] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used before it is defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57588] [C++11][constexpr] static constexpr in class fails to link

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57588 --- Comment #3 from Matt Clarkson --- Thanks for that link, its very informative :) I can see why it fails to link now. About the private destructor, I'd expect it to not compile, but it does. I actually didn't even realise I'd made it private a

[Bug target/57589] New: Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Bug ID: 57589 Summary: Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 30294 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30294&action=edit Proposed patch to fix problem

[Bug fortran/55057] [OOP] wrong result with abstract type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55057 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- It has been fixed between revisions 194721 and 195140.

[Bug fortran/57590] New: [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 Bug ID: 57590 Summary: [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/42021] Misleading error message when inherited typedefs cause ambiguity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42021 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] class containers are recycled between symbols more than they should be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #0) > This bug was found while trying to fix pr57297. By the way pr57297 is the reverse problem (not enough sharing instead of too much).

[Bug fortran/52392] internal compiler error occurs when compilin files separately but not when all is in one file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52392 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- It seems to have been fixed at revision 171654. It works with 4.7.3, 4.8.1, and trunk. The 4.6 version is no longer supported. I think this PR could be closed as fixed.

[Bug fortran/52227] [OOP] TARGET attribute mishandled in polymorphic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51610] [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53951] [OOP] Later TARGET statement ignored for CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53951 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52392] internal compiler error occurs when compilin files separately but not when all is in one file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52392 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30294|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30295|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/44604] Wrong run-time checks with VALUE dummies and pointer/allocatable actuals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44604 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57589] Linux powerpc -mcpu=native returns pointer to variable on stack in driver-rs6000.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/57591] New: gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 Bug ID: 57591 Summary: gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug tree-optimization/57592] New: ICE in tree_unroll_loops_completely at -O3

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dhazeghi at yahoo dot com With current gcc trunk on x86_64-linux, the following code causes an ICE when compiled at -O3. This is a regression from 4.8.x. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 4.9.0 20130611 (experimental

[Bug c++/57593] New: Friendship not extended into friend member-declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57593 Bug ID: 57593 Summary: Friendship not extended into friend member-declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 12 06:43:05 2013 New Revision: 199984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199984&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/56564 * varasm.c (decl_binds_to_current_def_p): Call bind