http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
int main() {}
#define A(n) __attribute__ ((used, externally_visible)) int \
tti \
##
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
--- Comment #8 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu ---
Hi!
In the meanwhile I'v successfully compiled uClibc 0.9.33.2 with LTO.
It required to patch only a few (2-3) lines to mark these sections as used.
We are running
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57653
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Allan McRae from comment #6)
I have also confirmed this issue on Fedora rawhide.
gcc 4.8.1 20130603 (Red Hat 4.8.1-1)
What I would do to investigate this issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53126
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
niter analysis computes
(((unsigned long) sp_35(ab) - (unsigned long) (sp_3(ab) + 8)) + 7) / 8))
which the vectorizer inserts, obviously breaking coalescing of sp_35 and sp_3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57633
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem seems to be
2012finish_list_read (st_parameter_dt *dtp)
...
2019 if (dtp-u.p.at_eol)
2020{
2021 dtp-u.p.at_eol = 0;
2022 return;
2023
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57655
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57633
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00109.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55867
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56169
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Any progress?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54096
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57292
--- Comment #1 from Ellis N. Thomas ExtraLeveLInSoftware at ntlworld dot com
---
It also failed during installation with errors for libitm.la, equivalent
to the failures during build runtime libraries:
bash make install
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
No activity for over three years. I'll close it as WONTFIX in a few days if
nobody care anymore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
Bug 56982 depends on bug 57584, which changed state.
Bug 57584 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ice: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce
ssa_names
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57584
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57639
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51790
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57639
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, the following variant ...
implicit none
class(*) :: t1, t2
print *, SAME_TYPE_AS (t1, t2)
end
... gives a different backtrace:
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org
---
-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/local --program-suffix=-4.9
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130620 (experimental) (GCC)
$ g++-4.9 -std=c++11 src/parser.cpp.1.ii
../../src/parser.cpp: In instantiation of
'pomdp::parsed_POMDP_POMDP_traits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40756
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658
--- Comment #1 from Takaki Makino t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com ---
It seems that the attachment file size was 1000.3KB and rejected by bugzilla.
Anyway please download preprocessed source from the URL above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57633
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jun 20 10:55:03 2013
New Revision: 200238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200238root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-06-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57633
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57639
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57488
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fno-tree-partial-pre fixes this, partial PRE figures that v on entry to the
l loop is invariant in the outer loop. Thus it does
tem = v;
for (k = 1; k = 0; k--)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659
Bug ID: 57659
Summary: Failure in installing documentation of gcc-4.7.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ellis N. Thomas from comment #0)
4 Information about the build state
[...]
6 Summary of Bugs
What happened to chapter 5? :)
6.2 Extra Information
If extra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602
--- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
For both cases we have calls of static routines where address of some static
variable is being passed.
Since all this could be seen only for 32 bits, problem looks like some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57488
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fun thing is that this is a regular partial redundancy but requires
an earlier partial partial redundancy elimination to be performed.
So what happens is that
int v;
void foo
/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30325action=edit
forwprop-28.c.022t.forwprop1
Executing on host: /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130620/Build/gcc/xgcc
-B/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130620/Build/gcc/
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130620/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661
Bug ID: 57661
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in verify_ssa
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
Bug ID: 57662
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
code_motion_process_successors with -fschedule-insns2
-fselective-scheduling2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40756
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Let's reopen. I want to add a TREE_BLOCK for (module) global variables
for namelists, cf. PR37132. Those would be used by the BE/LTO.
I don't this is related to this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35707
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to Daniel Franke from comment #13)
Yes, I think that this text needs an update.
I concur that we - still - need a better documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43899
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #15)
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12)
Remaining [...] is to warn on an unused namelist. I think this will involve
/powerpc64-bgq-linux//bin
--with-sbin=/bgsys/drivers/ppcfloor//gnu-linux/powerpc64-bgq-linux//sbin
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130620 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57660
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
wmi at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57660
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
We've got two choices here.
First is to somehow make the number of replacements we look for be conditional
on the target. For targets with an appropriate branch cost (such as m68K)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663
Bug ID: 57663
Summary: Arithmetic error with -fPIC -O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57660
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52351
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57307
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56806
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
I did a small workaround for ELF overflow: --param lto-partitions=64.
Following errors were met:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
Looks like ld.gold has a problem with large amount of files:
FAILED: flock linker.lock g++ -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -pthread
-Wl,-z,noexecstack -fPIC -pie -L. -flto=9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
I created a bug for gold linker in binutils bugzilla:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15660
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57664
Bug ID: 57664
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in
should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6750 with
-fdebug-types-section and lambda
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This is the case up to revision 197010 (2013-03-23), but the code is
accepted after revision 197550 (2013-04-07). Can this PR be closed as FIXED?
Likely revision 197053.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50536
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45824
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #3 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org ---
Created attachment 30330
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30330action=edit
pr57637.patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #4 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org ---
Root cause:
For ARM, gcc might generate cond_exec insns before shrink-wrapping. But
DF_LR_BB_INFO (bb)-def does not include def info from cond_exec insns. So the
check in function
72 matches
Mail list logo
