http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58173
Bug ID: 58173
Summary: [C++11] Bad interaction between sizeof... and
remainder (%) operators
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58113
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Quoting round_4.f90, which somehow no one seems to read ...
! Test whether I/O rounding works. Uses internally (libgfortran) strtod
! for the conversion - and sets the CPU rounding mode accordingly.
!
! If it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am running into a similar situation with a modified 4.7 on mips64-linux-gnu
(configured to use the Octeon2 instructions which has a load instruction which
does base+index [or rather reg+reg]).
:
D.14164_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58172
Bug ID: 58172
Summary: ifcvt test failures for armv8-a
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-*-*, crisv32-*-* |
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nils
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58171
Bug ID: 58171
Summary: Incorrect error message on invalid code when using
class constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58113
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58170
Bug ID: 58170
Summary: Crash when aliasing a template class that is a member
of its template base class.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58128
--- Comment #4 from Ellis N. Thomas
---
The decision to close this without any action seems unjustified. The problem
is being rejected on the basis that the handling of the exception is faulty in
the older Darwin. However, the fundamental probl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58169
Bug ID: 58169
Summary: missed load PRE related to array index truncation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58158
--- Comment #1 from Aaro Koskinen ---
A simplified reproducer:
$ cat bar.c
extern void foo(void);
static inline double max(const double x, const double y)
{
return (x > y) ? x : y;
}
void bar(int d)
{
int i;
for (i = 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58168
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58168
Bug ID: 58168
Summary: Installation of GCC 4.8.1 (libstdc++) hangs in
make_sunver.pl on Solaris10/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
--- Comment #1 from leanid ---
file can't compile: http://ubuntuone.com/1Pwt7bzCgPDFgaR90gchRy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58167
Bug ID: 58167
Summary: compile crush
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51559
Ganton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kubry at terra dot com
--- Comment #3 from Ganto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58164
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
> Well, that wouldn't be sufficient, you'd need to also remove the EH edges
> from the other bb. But not splitting the block means you don't have to
> bother with that.
Well, that's true. We could do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30661|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Alexander Ivchenko from comment #4)
> I firstly did something like that:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
> index 9b6186e..5862ebf 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
I firstly did something like that:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
index 9b6186e..5862ebf 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c
@@ -771,6 +771,9 @@ shrink_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58166
Bug ID: 58166
Summary: ARMv5: poor register allocation in function containing
smull instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58105
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Hello!
I am away from my keyboard for a couple of days, but I will take care
of your patch.
Thanks,
Uros.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:01 PM, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58163
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is a debug-mode test: check-debug itself passes -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG. Just
browse the log, if you aren't a believer ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>The guilty revision is:
No that just exposed the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58165
Bug ID: 58165
Summary: [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error:
verify_flow_info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
30 matches
Mail list logo
