[Bug tree-optimization/58248] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 Bug ID: 58248 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Christian Widmer from comment #4) Here is a short patch adding Ivy Bridge and Haswell detection. Because Ivy Bridge does not support AVX2 it differs a bit from the

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- (In reply to Easwaran Raman from comment #21) Created attachment 30690 [details] Proposed patch I tested this patch on top of the one posted to the mailing list

[Bug tree-optimization/58246] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #24 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- Also the other 'dup' PRs still fail (gcc -O3) . Collecting testcases here: cat PR58018.c int a, b, c, d, e; void bar (int p) { int f = b; e = p = (f ^= 0);

[Bug tree-optimization/58246] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/58247] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_unroll_loops_completely at -O3 (both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58247 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Jakub, perhaps you used the testcase from 58247, not the one below? I double checked and still get wrong code on this one.

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) I get ICE instead, starting with r199048 . This means that 58247 is probably indeed a dup of 57592, which also started with r199048

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- No, the only change I've made to this testcase was instead of using printf use if (c != 1) __builtin_abort ();. If you can, next time please try to adjust the testcases such that they

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) No, the only change I've made to this testcase was instead of using printf use if (c != 1) __builtin_abort ();. I checked the modified test

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Are you sure your gcc isn't configured with --enable-checking=release ? I really get: pr58248.c: In function ‘main’: pr58248.c:14:1: error: definition in block 2 follows the use main

[Bug c++/58249] New: [C++11] internal compiler error with std::vector and deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249 Bug ID: 58249 Summary: [C++11] internal compiler error with std::vector and deleted copy constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/58249] [C++11] internal compiler error with std::vector and deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249 Jan Vidar Krey janvidar at extatic dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janvidar at

[Bug c++/57086] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janvidar

[Bug c++/58249] [C++11] internal compiler error with std::vector and deleted copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58249 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57763] [4.9 Regression]: comp-goto-1.c: ICE verify_flow_info failed, error: EDGE_CROSSING missing across section boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Steven, is there anything else you are expecting from me to solve this problem?

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #25 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- *** Bug 58248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57877] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57877 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57876] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57876 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57875] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57861] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57861 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57860] wrong code for bitwise ops with long long literal on x86_64-linux (32-bit mode)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57860 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57718] [4.9 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, passes.c:2002 at -O3 (both -m32 -m64)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57718 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 57718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/57860] wrong code for bitwise ops with long long literal on x86_64-linux (32-bit mode)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57860 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013 New Revision: 202018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57860 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/57861] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57861 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013 New Revision: 202018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57860 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/57877] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57877 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013 New Revision: 202018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57860 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/57875] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57875 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013 New Revision: 202018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57860 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/57876] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57876 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 27 09:24:52 2013 New Revision: 202018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202018root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/57860 PR

[Bug gcov-profile/58250] New: -fprofile-use causes: warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays is not supported with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58250 Bug ID: 58250 Summary: -fprofile-use causes: warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays is not supported with -Os Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/58146] Array slice bounds checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch committed: Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Aug 25 22:55:12 2013 New Revision: 201981 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201981root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-08-26 Thomas Koenig

[Bug c++/19817] C++ front-end produces a cast instead of just a.b (when call the destructor)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19817 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|

[Bug fortran/53945] Scalar element of assumed-shape dummy array not recognized as C interoperable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53945 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57521] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code for expressions in loop at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57521 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug fortran/49076] [F03] ASSOCIATE: Array descriptor passed to explicit-shaped dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49076 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48959] Dummy procedure: Argument mismatch not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48959 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/58146] Array slice bounds checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Related bugs: PR 50548, PR 33906

[Bug c++/13981] Give message about incomplete class that might be implicitly upcasted.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13981 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/58227] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (hangs) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58227 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/58251] New: -flto causes ICE lto1: internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4706

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58251 Bug ID: 58251 Summary: -flto causes ICE lto1: internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4706 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/57219] __builtin_isinf_sign source comments more restrictive than documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/57776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr56297 c_lto_pr56297_0.o-c_lto_pr56297_1.o link, -flto -fno-common (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57776 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/57864] [4.7 Regression] ICE in bitmap_set_replace_value, at tree-ssa-pre.c:862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57864 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/52402] IPA-SRA creates aligned loads from unaligned memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57850] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Option -fdump-translation-unit not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/58252] New: ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252 Bug ID: 58252 Summary: ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/58252] ice in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug tree-optimization/58253] New: IPA-SRA creates aligned loads from unaligned memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58253 Bug ID: 58253 Summary: IPA-SRA creates aligned loads from unaligned memory Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||areg.melikadamyan at

[Bug middle-end/58096] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-alias.c fails with r201439

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56933] [4.9 Regression] Vectorizer missing read-write dependency for interleaved accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/56933] [4.9 Regression] Vectorizer missing read-write dependency for interleaved accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/58146] Array slice bounds checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58146 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/57994] Constant folding of infinity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57994 --- Comment #15 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net --- If GCC intends to handle Bessel functions j0, j1, jn, y0, y1, yn (POSIX), there may be differences with GNU MPFR. See my messages and bug report:

[Bug tree-optimization/56933] [4.9 Regression] Vectorizer missing read-write dependency for interleaved accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4) The test case gcc.dg/vect/pr56933.c fails on a pentium II, because of invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #8 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) Are you sure your gcc isn't configured with --enable-checking=release ? Jakub, below is my gcc configure: Configured with:

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Now that Aldy's/Jakub's OMP_SIMD patch (backend only) is in, r202029, - we can use it to annotate DO CONCURRENT loops. (The semantics should be the same - and match vector length of

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #10 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) For testing bugs against trunk it is better to omit both --disable-checking and --enable-checking=release and just use the default.

[Bug tree-optimization/58248] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58248 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- For testing bugs against trunk it is better to omit both --disable-checking and --enable-checking=release and just use the default. Because otherwise the compiler doesn't perform

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 --- Comment #7 from Christian Widmer shadow at umbrox dot de --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) (In reply to Christian Widmer from comment #4) Created attachment 30703 [details] Patch to add Ivy Bridge/Haswell detection Here is a

[Bug c++/58254] New: ICE when using PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58254 Bug ID: 58254 Summary: ICE when using PGO Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/58254] ICE when using PGO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58254 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue.

[Bug target/57927] -march=core-avx2 different than -march=native on INTEL Haswell (i7-4700K)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58255] New: [C++11] explicit delegating constructor with no arguments wrongly rejected

. Fails using g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20130827 (experimental): g++ -c -std=c++11 /tmp/t1.cc -o /tmp/t.o /tmp/t1.cc: In constructor 'A::A(int)': /tmp/t1.cc:3:16: error: no matching function for call to 'A::A()' A(int x) : A() { } ^ /tmp/t1.cc:3:16: note: candidates are: /tmp/t1.cc:3:3: note

[Bug c/58256] New: gcc for h8300 internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start

/local/libexec/gcc/h8300-gchen-elf/4.9.0/lto-wrapper Target: h8300-gchen-elf Configured with: ../gcc-4.9.0/configure --target=h8300-gchen-elf --without-header --disable-nls --enable-language=c --disable-threads --disable-shared --enable-werror=no Thread model: single gcc version 4.9.0 20130827