http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|sgk at troutmask dot apl.washingto |
|n.ed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
Sean Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Spurious error when using |[F2008] BOZ literals in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #4 from Brooks Moses ---
It turns out that we do need these symbols in libssp despite having a nice
plain x86-Linux environment. We've got some precompiled blobs from
who-knows-where that want the "LIBSSP_1.0" version of the __vsnprin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
This is fixed for cris-elf in (201978:202144] apparently r202111 as also
obvious from the message at gcc-patches. It's probably fixed everywhere. Can
Pat the reporter or Jan the fixer please verify and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
Bug ID: 58312
Summary: libssp configure check for "usable vsnprintf" is
broken on cross-compilers.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid, diagnostic |wrong-code
Summary|Missing dia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #1 from Brooks Moses ---
Jakub, I added you to the cc list in hopes that you may be able to comment on
the original reasoning for this being a runtime check rather than simply a
check for the ability to link a program calling vsnprintf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #4 from Caroline Tice ---
I am looking into this now. I will update this bug when I know more.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #3 from Brooks Moses ---
Thanks, Joseph. This is a straightforward Linux target using glibc, so I'll
investigate to see why the binary in question is relying on libssp rather than
glibc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58312
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If your target uses glibc, you don't need libssp anyway.
libssp is used by LINK_SSP_SPEC if TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP is not
defined. TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP is defined when glibc headers a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
rogerio.araujo at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerio.araujo at gmail d
re --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran
--prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-202196-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/
--without-cloog --without-ppl
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130903 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
As James had already pointed out - and as Richard Maine confirmed in a follow
up, the code violates the following constraint of Fortran 2003:
"C614 (R612) There shall not be more than one part-ref with nonz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58310
Bug ID: 58310
Summary: Allocatable component arrays: Wrong code after calling
a subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
Bug ID: 58308
Summary: Segmentation fault: internal compiler error: in
make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1147
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58309
Bug ID: 58309
Summary: spurious "parameter set but not used" warning in cilk
plus array code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58308
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry ---
c++11 mode is used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #194 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #193)
> I am building firefox with -O3 and get no undefined symbols. Can you,
> please, relink with -Wl,--no-demangle --save-temps -fdump-ipa-all and try to
> loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51629
rob.desbois at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob.desbois at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57616
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
> Mark's patch is in binutils 2.23.x, but the testcase is still failing on
> x86_64
> linux.
Right, same problem with binutils 2.23.1 addr2line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54072
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #193 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am building firefox with -O3 and get no undefined symbols. Can you, please,
relink with -Wl,--no-demangle --save-temps -fdump-ipa-all and try to look up
the missing symbol in -lm.res file and if it not UNDE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> 4.6.4 gives
>
> Error: Syntax error in structure constructor at (1)
>
> and 4.7.3
>
> Error: Function 'point' requires an argument list at (1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #0)
> produces (with 4.7, 4.8 and trunk) the error message
>
> real(point) :: this
> 1
> Error: Function 'point' requires an argument list at (1)
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50548
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33906
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
--- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> Doesn't look like a C++ front-end issue.
Surely, but I had to choose something not knowing what to choose.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58307
Bug ID: 58307
Summary: Bogus error 'Function requires an argument list'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58076
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Wienke ---
class ToBeDeprecated {
} __attribute__ ((deprecated ("deprecated!")));
int main() {
ToBeDeprecated();
ToBeDeprecated x;
return 0;
}
The first use does not issue the warning, the second does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:18:34 2013
New Revision: 202217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-08-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:16:28 2013
New Revision: 202216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-08-30
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:14:58 2013
New Revision: 202215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202215&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-08-30
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
Bug ID: 58306
Summary: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter
(X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58305
Bug ID: 58305
Summary: Deprecation warning for class not raised when not
assigning to a variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #26 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #25)
> I think that
>
> tem = get_inner_reference (to, &bitsize, &bitpos, &offset, &mode1,
> &unsignedp, &volatilep, true);
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58304
Bug ID: 58304
Summary: gcc dev branch compilation Failed at libstdc++-v3
(used gcc 4.7.3 to compile)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This has been fixed between r199406 (ICE) and r199412 (OK). r199409 seems the
most likely candidate.
If nobody care to understand why, I'll close this PR as fixed in the coming
week.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH, ice-on-valid-code,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:19:16 2013
New Revision: 202210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/58302
* include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:12:44 2013
New Revision: 202209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202209&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/58302
* include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:12:19 2013
New Revision: 202208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202208&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/58302
* include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
I think that
tem = get_inner_reference (to, &bitsize, &bitpos, &offset, &mode1,
&unsignedp, &volatilep, true);
if (TREE_CODE (to) == COMPONENT_REF
&&
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57656
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 10:00:06 2013
New Revision: 202204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/57656
* fold-const.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 09:48:27 2013
New Revision: 202202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202202&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
PR lto/58285
* tree-streamer-out.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Duplicate of pr53086 also.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This looks like a duplicate of pr50463 (and may be more).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips-vxworks
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-linux |
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58302
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56805
--- Comment #7 from Jan Smets ---
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets ---
vxworks target : . vs $ in asm names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58298
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58270
--- Comment #18 from Krzysztof Strasburger ---
I have found that tree-fre, tree-pre and tree-dse have to be disabled in order
to generate correctly working code at all optimization levels (both C and
FORTRAN).
I'm happy with this workaround, so th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 07:53:05 2013
New Revision: 202197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202197&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/57287
* gcc.dg/pr572
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287
>
> Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
decide_is_symbol_needed has
/* Double check that no one output the function into assembly file early. */
but it gets
>
QI
size
unit size
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 cano
81 matches
Mail list logo
