http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309
icegood1980 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||icegood1980 at gmail dot co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58260
--- Comment #13 from anand.karanam at tcs dot com ---
Created attachment 30879
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30879&action=edit
libgcc_config.log
Please check this and help with your inputs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58260
--- Comment #12 from anand.karanam at tcs dot com ---
Hi,
Now, I have the glibc from Linux host copied to a common path. Able to build
the Solaris to Linux cross compiler but that doesn't work.
hello.c: In function 'main':
hello.c:10:1: interna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58496
Bug ID: 58496
Summary: bug in win64 calling standard
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There is no problem with having as many reductions as you need, if they are
separate variables; the only case that will prevent vectorization is if you
have a struct/class with multiple data members as reducti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58495
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|imzhuli at vi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58495
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You need to say:
xFromB.template f();
See http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#disambiguation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58495
Bug ID: 58495
Summary: member function template all of class template yield
'expected primary-expression'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I suspect this is just PR58473.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 21-Sep-13, at 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on
> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11?
Don't know. It looks like libquadmath has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58494
Bug ID: 58494
Summary: ICE (verify_ssa failed)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58482
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente ---
I see.
I have several use cases in which the reduction requires the access to two
variables
(minloc for instance: the minimum and its location)
btw tried
omp parallel for simd
got ICE
c++ -std=c++11 u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
Bug ID: 58493
Summary: loop is not correctly optimized with O3 and AVX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on
hppa64-hp-hpux11.11?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Causes following fails:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gf
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com
Hello ! The following testcase makes GCC 4.9.0 as of 20130921 crash.
$ cat vfi.c
void f(int p, short q)
{
f(0, 0);
}
$ xgcc -O3 -fipa-pta vfi.c
vfi.c: In function âfâ:
vfi.c:1:6: error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/parms.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/parms.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491
Bug ID: 58491
Summary: FAIL:
ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58490
Bug ID: 58490
Summary: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap sign bit failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
> The test gfortran.dg/defined_assignment_11.f90 fails on
> x86_64-apple-darwin10:
This is due to some patch I have in my working tree: the test pas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58456
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have signaled the failure at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg01317.html
and got the following answer
Thanks for reporting, I think this can be fixed by patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58489
Bug ID: 58489
Summary: ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at
postreload.c:411
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55914
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 55914, which changed state.
Bug 55914 Summary: [C++11] Pack expansion fails in lambda expressions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55914
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875
Martin Husemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
26 matches
Mail list logo
