http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58626
Bug ID: 58626
Summary: possible array wrong code bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58608
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993
--- Comment #1 from Carrot ---
I did some more experimentation on this benchmark.
O0/O1 generates correct result, but O2/Os generates wrong result. So the
problem should be in some optimization pass that is enabled in O2/Os while
disabled in O1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58560
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58560
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 4 23:48:29 2013
New Revision: 203220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58560
* typeck2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> Weird that nobody noticed for so much time. Are there actual testcases for
> this? Or in practice it's just an optimization issue, not a correctness
> issue?
In s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58503
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58503
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 4 23:17:51 2013
New Revision: 203219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58503
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58448
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58448
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 4 23:13:59 2013
New Revision: 203218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58448
* pt.c (tsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58608
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen ---
Current trunk bootstraps now (r203154). Bisecting to see revision that fixed
it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58625
Bug ID: 58625
Summary: std::signbit always converts to double
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58603
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
KDE added a trailing underscore to work around this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
--- Comment #1 from dimitry ---
Created attachment 30956
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30956&action=edit
source file
Added small source file that reproduces the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58591
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
Bug ID: 58624
Summary: gcc internal compiler error: Segmentaion fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58591
--- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ---
I think the template argument descriptors should be "I1AJiiEE". This produces a
demangling that looks right:
$ c++filt _Z9ConstructI1AJiiEEvPT_DpOT0_
void Construct(A*, int&&, int&&)
And running this test cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55747
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623
Bug ID: 58623
Summary: lack of ldp/stp optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55747
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-* arm*-*-* cris*-*-*
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58622
Bug ID: 58622
Summary: With -fomit-frame-pointer, A64 does not generate
post-decrement stores
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 16:54:55 2013
New Revision: 203208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203208&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Correct ChangeLog for PR fortran/57697
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-bra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58621
Bug ID: 58621
Summary: With -fsection-anchors, a superfluous 'add' is
performed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58620
Bug ID: 58620
Summary: [OOP] Defined assignment not called for TYPE when the
type's extension is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 16:25:55 2013
New Revision: 203207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-04 Tobias Burnus
Backport from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 16:25:55 2013
New Revision: 203207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-04 Tobias Burnus
Backport from mainline
2013-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
The ICE is caused by *n being NULL, so it seems we did not remap the block.
This perhaps means that we have stale block in the edge location?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58460
mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58460
--- Comment #2 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mshawcroft
Date: Fri Oct 4 14:57:04 2013
New Revision: 203204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix PR58460.
2013-10-04 Marcus Shawcroft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-linux-gnueabi,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Bug ID: 58619
Summary: ICE building libstdc++-v3 on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
in gen_combined_adhoc_loc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58617
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko.abraham@hella-gutmann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
Bug ID: 58618
Summary: ICE with character array and ASSOCIATE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58617
Bug ID: 58617
Summary: gcc crashed on compile arithmetic (or) expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
Anatoly Sinyavin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.sinyavin at samsung dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini ---
Dodji, any progress on this? Looks like Part 1 of the latest patch set still
needs work? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00728.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58448
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Ah, right. We don't have an A binfo in C's base list.
>
> I believe you can distinguish this case by looking at the
> BINFO_INHERITANCE_CHAIN of the A binfo; in this case, it should point back to
> C
> rath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58560
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 10:08:57 2013
New Revision: 203202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203202&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing changelog entry for Rev. 203201:
2013-10-04 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55469
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Oct 4 10:06:23 2013
New Revision: 203201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/55469
* io/list_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug ID: 58616
Summary: [meta-bug] nsdmi
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, indeed :(. As it's too old, I don't have enough cc1plus binaries to
really bisect it. Sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Gah, sorry, you're right. In fact, started with r179156:
$ ./cc1plus-179156 -quiet -std=c++0x ~/x.C
/home/polacek/x.C: In substitution of ‘template
template int A<0>::B::foo() [with = ,
= int, = ]’:
/home
56 matches
Mail list logo
