http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063
--- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Evgeniy Stepanov from comment #17)
> Sorry, I forgot to mention this. Should be done in r194372.
Thanks! A pity this isn't going to help in gcc case that much because of bug
58680.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #13 from Evgeniy Stepanov ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #12)
> (In reply to Evgeniy Stepanov from comment #8)
> > ... one of the ASan interceptors
> > that does ENSURE_ASAN_INITED().
> > Arguably, all interceptors should do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #7)
> Created attachment 31217 [details]
> Additioanl patch for r203634.
--> gcc-patches@...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59140
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Seems fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59144
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to tmmikolajczyk from comment #0)
> The compilation passes (on gcc and clang). It's quite weird that the
> virtualism of the "X::bar" method has such an impact.
But that doesn't make it a bug.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
--- Comment #21 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Author: kcc
Date: Fri Nov 15 10:31:14 2013
New Revision: 204838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204838&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR sanitizer/58994
Modified:
trunk/libsanitizer/ChangeLog
tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I finally have a patch ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
Bug ID: 59145
Summary: apache compilation in AIX 7.1 - erro while starting
the apache server
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
balamuruganpalani at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:06:25 2013
New Revision: 204840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add and use System.Linux.time_t for time_t
PR ada/54040
* s-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Samsonov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> No processes should be launched at all. Blocks the release - please make it
> at least configurable to be able to turn it off.
External process will only be l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Trying to build chrome with gcc's asan...
The build barks as in this bug -- we do need to build libsanitizer (at least
asan) with -fno-rtti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #11)
> The build barks as in this bug
Did it work with the patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #2 from Holger Machens ---
Created attachment 31224
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31224&action=edit
Test case to reproduce the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Bug ID: 59146
Summary: Segfault when ommiting '&' in 'bind (C) ' procedure
call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany ---
> Did it work with the patch?
Yes!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Related bug is PR54570.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
Bug ID: 59147
Summary: 128-bit division error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56703
Yves Caniou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
--- Comment #1 from rglindley at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31227
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31227&action=edit
compiler information
Output from following:
gfortran -v -save-temps -Wall -Wextra division_test.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57756
--- Comment #9 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Hi Uros,
I decided that the bug owner should fix it and send my patch (or
modified one) for review to GCC community, i.e. I was not planning to
fix it. But if I should do it pls let me know and I send it to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (with -m64), x86_64-apple-darwin10,
and x86_64-apple-darwin13. It looks like a bug in the 128-bit library of
x86_64-w64-mingw32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 15 14:48:22 2013
New Revision: 204845
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/50262
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Just tried to bootstrap/regtest that patch, unfortunately it doesn't build at
all on i686. Is it meant to work on x86_64 only (or only for
SANITIZER_WORDSIZE == 64)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58994
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59122
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
===
# of expected passes648
# of unexpected failures2
# of unsupported tests202
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc version 4.9.0
20131115 (experimental) (GCC)
Compiler version: 4.9.0 20131115 (experimental) (GCC)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #25 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
> Just tried to bootstrap/regtest that patch, unfortunately it doesn't build
> at all on i686. Is it meant to work on x86_64 only (or only for
> SANITIZER_WOR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26205
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffp at doomsday dot org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58666
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tromey at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59133
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've started to work on it. The problem is in that LRA has not enough code to
deal with creation of pseudos out of its scope. I guess the fix will be ready
next week on Wednesday as the patch will need a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
Bug ID: 59149
Summary: diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an
ADDR_EXPR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Oh, nice. Yes will do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59148
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth ---
Also confirmed that if you compile the failing test case using current
llvm/clang svn with...
/sw/opt/llvm-3.4/bin/clang -fsanitize=address -g -fdiagnostics-color=never -O0
-fno-builtin-malloc -fno-builtin-str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59143
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri Nov 15 22:00:36 2013
New Revision: 204864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
When file status is unknown, don't set O_CREAT when opening read-only.
2013-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
libbacktrace doesn't use malloc (unless mmap isn't supported), handles inline
frames just fine and Ian has posted today a patch to support also data symbol
lookups. I think I'll post a sanitizer_symbolizer_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59019
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
This has gone latent. Regardless it's relatively easy to fix things up in
combine -- which does similar kinds of things when it's able to collapse a
conditional jump to an unconditional jump and the like. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:17:23 2013
New Revision: 204866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58599
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58599, which changed state.
Bug 58599 Summary: [c++11] Trouble with non-static data member initializers in
templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58599
What|Removed |Adde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is also fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is also fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949
--- Comment #9 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:39:50 2013
New Revision: 204870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2013-11-15 Ulrich Weigand
Backport from mainline r201750.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
Bug ID: 59150
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in expand_one_var, at
cfgexpand.c:1242 with -fopenmp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58188
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58188
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 15 23:51:23 2013
New Revision: 204881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58188
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58829, which changed state.
Bug 58829 Summary: non-static member initializer in nested template class
produces incorrect compile error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58188, which changed state.
Bug 58188 Summary: ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:738
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58725, which changed state.
Bug 58725 Summary: segfault with non-static member initializer in a nested
struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58725
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
80 matches
Mail list logo
